• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Arkansas Woodpecker "New Twist"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
864
Location
Puget Sound, Washington
http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science/07/22/woodpecker.question.ap/index.html

This is the story of the extinct woodpecker that was rediscovered in Arkansas this past spring. According to the last paragraph the government is pouring millions into the area. Any reports on what this is going to do to the area for hunting? Wouldn't that be something if it turned out it wasn't the bird? The unfortunate part is that it will take years to undo the damage of a false story if it is.
 
I'm proud I don't hunt over in that part of the state. I hear tell of folks just pouring into the woods.
 
Well, according to the associated text, they like mature bottomland forest, cypress swamps and large hardwood trees. Sounds like environment worth keeping around, to me. Hope the little (actually, with a wingspan of over 30", they're pretty dadgummed huge, for a woodpecker) guys are still out there. I don't see any reason why they should interfere with lawful hunting. Backwoods duck hunters might want to check twice before squeezing off a round, though!
 
This is the story of the extinct woodpecker that was rediscovered in Arkansas this past spring. According to the last paragraph the government is pouring millions into the area. Any reports on what this is going to do to the area for hunting? Wouldn't that be something if it turned out it wasn't the bird? The unfortunate part is that it will take years to undo the damage of a false story if it is.

Actually, the birds were no rediscovered last spring, but in February of of 2004. The sightings were not presented/reported until publication in April of 2005.

Since the gov't might dump millions into the area to preserve habitat, then just what sort of damage is being done that would take years to undo if the report is wrong?
 
I kinda doubt that the story is false; they've got some video footage, and several ornithologists have either sighted it or heard the distinctive double-knock presentation drum of the bird. There's some decent documentation of what it sounded and looked like from the '30's.

Regarding what they want to do with the conservation effort, I found this:
David Luneau, associate professor at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, said he thought the best chance to film the elusive bird would be to have a camcorder on at all times. On April 25, Luneau captured four seconds of video footage showing an Ivory-billed Woodpecker taking off from the trunk of a tree.
Frame-by-frame analyses show a bird perched on a tupelo trunk, with a distinctive white pattern on its back. During 1.2 seconds of flight, the video reveals 11 wing beats showing extensive white on the trailing edges of the wings and white on the back. Both of these features distinguish the Ivory-billed Woodpecker from the superficially similar, and much more common, Pileated Woodpecker.
On three occasions, members of the search team heard series of loud double-raps, possibly the Ivory-billed Woodpecker's display drumming. On February 14, 2005, Casey Taylor of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology heard the drumming for 30 minutes, then watched as an Ivory-billed Woodpecker, being mobbed by crows, flew into view.
In addition, autonomous recording units detected sounds, among thousands of hours of recordings, which resembled double-raps and possible calls of the ivory-bill--reminiscent of the sound of a tin horn. Researchers say ongoing analyses of the recordings have not yet enabled them to rule out other potential sound sources, such as the calls of Blue Jays, which are notorious mimics.
In all, during more than 22,000 hours of search time, experienced observers reported at least 15 sightings of the ivory-bill, seven of which were described in the Science article. Because only a single bird was observed at a time, researchers say they don't yet know whether more than one inhabits the area.
So far, the search team has focused its efforts in approximately 56 of the 860 square miles in the bottomland forests of Arkansas. Fitzpatrick of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology said that the next step will be to broaden the search to assess whether breeding pairs exist and how many ivory-bills the region may support. To expand the area being monitored and minimize disturbance to the endangered woodpecker, the team will continue to use acoustic monitoring technologies as well as on-the-ground searching. Fitzpatrick said the team will also encourage others to search for the ivory-bill elsewhere in suitable habitats throughout the South.
Simon of The Nature Conservancy said that over the years, state and federal agencies, conservation organizations, hunters and landowners have aggressively worked to conserve and restore the bottomland hardwood and swamp ecosystem. "Now we know we must work even harder to conserve this critical habitat--not just for the Ivory-billed Woodpecker, but for the black bears, waterfowl and many other species of these unique woods," he added.
The partnership's 10-year goal is to restore 200,000 more acres of forest in the Big Woods. The effort will include conserving forest habitat, improving river water quality, and restoring the physical structure of the river channels, focusing in locations with maximum benefit in reconnecting forest patches and protecting river health.

"The ivory-bill tells us that we could actually bring this system back to that primeval forest here in the heartland of North America," said Fitzpatrick. "That's the kind of forest that I hope some generation of Americans and citizens of the world will get to come and visit."

Looks to me like they're saying we need to shoot more crows... ;)
 
Spy, in deals like this there are at least three groups involved: Local residents and hunters/fishermen; forestry people and wildlife biologists, and then the politicians, Sierra Clubbers and human-interest reporters.

I generally trust the judgement of the first two groups. IMO, the third group is capable of using a rubber tack hammer to destroy an anvil.

I'll rant: The Sierra Club types will want total off-limits preservation of the entire area. The mediahcrities will go along, implying that the present activities of locals will utterly destroy the area if it is not protected. The politicos will go along with the noisiest as they always do. Many dollars will be spent. Nothing of note will be accomplished and the woodpecker won't really notice, except maybe to move elsewhere because of the influx of politically-important birders.

The scientifically knowledgeable will be ignored and the locals will be the ultimate losers.

Rant mode off.

Some may call me cynical. I submit that I have merely been observant for some decades...

:), Art
 
Other scientists publiishing a rebuttal of any scientific article published in a peer review journal is nothing of any paticular note. One team says,"hey, we found this." Other team then shows why they couldn't have found what they claimed. First team come back with more evidence. Colleagues decide who's got the most convincing evidence.

It takes more than one article either pro or con, people. Normal scientific process thus far. It's not a 'new twist.' In the science world, it's the same old, same old. A big part of the reason that there's still such a dust up about global warming...that and what Art said.
 
Over the las 30 years there have been reports of sightings of the Ivory Billed Woodpecker. Some in Louisiana.

Some reports were kept pretty quiet, in hopes of not bringing in a bunch of people.

It would be a treat to see one of these big birds. They make a sound like a clarinet, and have a distinct double-knock on the tree.

They feed on insects which grow in overmature hardwoods. Modern timber practices pretty much eliminated these trees by cutting them before they declined enough to harbor the insects, thus, endangering the IBW.

Many times I've use the IWB as an example of what hunters do for wildlife. At the same time the IWB was going downhill, so were ducks, and specifically wood ducks. Hunters raised millions, asked the Feds to limit the seasons and bag limits, ponied up dollars for habitat, etc.

Ducks came back from the lows of the 1930's.

No one hunted the IWB, so no one put up the bucks.

Sure, it's a vested interest, but it results in the contuation of a species.

Still, I sure would like to see one of those big suckers!
 
It's not a false story. The Ivory Bill is there.

hillbilly


http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050803/ap_on_sc/woodpecker_question_5

Ivory Bill's Doubters Convinced by Tapes By KELLY P. KISSEL, Associated Press Writer
Tue Aug 2, 8:31 PM ET

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - Recordings of the ivory-billed woodpecker's distinctive double-rap sounds have convinced doubting researchers that the large bird once thought extinct is still living in an east Arkansas swamp.

Last month, a group of ornithologists had questioned the announcement made in April of the rediscovery of the ivory-billed woodpecker, last sighted in 1944. They said blurry videotape of a bird in flight wasn't enough evidence. So a Cornell University researcher who was part of the team that announced the bird's rediscovery last spring says his group sent the doubters more evidence.

"We sent them some sounds this summer from the Arkansas woods," said John W. Fitzpatrick, director of the Cornell ornithology lab. "We appreciate their ability to say they are now believers."

The doubters had prepared an article for a scientific journal questioning whether the bird had really been found. They now plan to withdraw the article, according to ornithologist Richard Prum of Yale University, one of the doubters.

Prum said Tuesday he was particularly convinced by the Cornell researchers' two recordings of a series of nasally sounds that the ivory bills make and an exchange of double-rap sounds between two birds. He said the sounds matched recordings made in the 1930s in Louisiana.

"It's really on the basis of the new evidence that we've become convinced that the ivory-billed woodpecker exists," Prum said in a telephone interview.

The recordings seem to indicate that there is more than one ivory-billed woodpecker in the area.

"The bird that we saw had to have a mommy and a daddy," said Scott Simon, director of the Nature Conservancy in Arkansas. "We have solid evidence for one. We believe there are more."

Ornithologists announced in late April that an ivory-billed woodpecker was living in a swamp in the Cache River National Wildlife Refuge in eastern Arkansas. A Hot Springs kayaker had seen the bird a year earlier.

But Prum and fellow bird experts at Kansas and Florida Gulf Coast universities last month questioned the evidence, saying it was only strong enough only to suggest the possibility that the bird was present, not proof.

Another of those experts on Tuesday agreed with Prum.

"We were astounded. Yes, I totally believe, thank goodness, there are ivory bills," Mark Robbins of the University of Kansas said in a telephone interview. "We are ecstatic. Once everybody hears these vocalizations, you can't help but be convinced."

The Cornell ornithologists made 17,000 hours of recordings, using equipment set out in various places near the Cache and White rivers in Arkansas last winter.

One portion of the tapes has a distant double-rap, followed closely by a double-rap that is very close.

"It's communication typical of the ivory-billed. It's one of the more exciting cuts from the tape," Fitzpatrick said.

He said the audio had only recently been discovered on the tapes, which are being analyzed with computer assistance.

When the ornithologists announced in April that the bird had been found, the audio had not been reviewed closely enough, Fitzpatrick said. "We thought it was premature in April to publish the analyses."

The Cornell researchers plan to release the audio publicly at the American Ornithologists' Union in Santa Barbara, Calif., Aug. 23-27.

___

On the Net:
 
I have seen deer hanging from trees but have yet to see a deer climb one on its own for fun or profit. Chances of a stray round killing an IBW seem small and I'm unaware of deer hunting practices that might even remotely have a negative impact on the birds.

It seems goofy to me that activities like deer hunting would be banned due to the presence of the IBW. If some elements of the wildlife resources commission in Arkansas knew the IBW was there a year ago and took no action to restrict hunting or access their thinking must have been the same.

When the spotted owl went on the ESL I know logging was stopped but was hunting in the area also prohibited? Honest question.
Has the IBW been officially moved onto the ESL?
S-
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top