Hypnogator
Member
On this evening's ABC National News, they did a story on the danger of murder and assaults that real estate agents are facing from false clients. They featured one lady who had been a victim of an attempted robbery, and rather matter-of-factly displayed the Beretta Tomcat that she now carries.
What is remarkable is that the commentator identified it correctly by name and model and stated that she (the realtor) now carries it for protection, without the obligatory talking head from CSGV, Bloomberg Moms, et. al. spouting off about how she is in more danger with the gun, should rely on her cell phone to call police, etc.
Is this an editorial lapse, or are we to believe that the msm is now acknowledging that guns do offer protection?
What is remarkable is that the commentator identified it correctly by name and model and stated that she (the realtor) now carries it for protection, without the obligatory talking head from CSGV, Bloomberg Moms, et. al. spouting off about how she is in more danger with the gun, should rely on her cell phone to call police, etc.
Is this an editorial lapse, or are we to believe that the msm is now acknowledging that guns do offer protection?