• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Artillery

Status
Not open for further replies.
RPRNY

That looks like it should make for a fun afternoon at the range! Keep up the good work!
 
How much compression are you getting with that load?


Too much is my rough estimate.

It's topping 3/8" which is going to be too much but this is my first go with the 540 grs. I have had pretty good accuracy with a 535 gr Postell and nearly 1/4" compression, so I thought I would go ahead and try this. I will probably have to back it down to around 67 - 68 grs to get sub 1/4" compression. My other thought is try this compression with a Large Rifle primer to see what happens.
 
That's not artillery.

THIS is artillery:
IMG_2368.jpg

Current load is 3oz of Cannon powder, or 2.5oz of 2F; each w/ a filler of Cremora or flour. Boom!
 
The 40 ton, 35" bore Tsar cannon. Wouldn't want to get hit by an almost 3' diameter cannon ball. It could make for a very bad day. I wonder how much powder this thing used per round? The recoil must have also been something.
 
I learned that the Ottomans didn't haul their big artillery for knocking down fortresses/castles around. They casted them in place.
 
I learned that the Ottomans didn't haul their big artillery for knocking down fortresses/castles around. They casted them in place.

Makes sense given the transportation infrastructure of the day. Even 3 to 400 years later Napoleon wanted to bring this cannon back to France but there was no way it was going to happen in the early 1800'a.
 
The 40 ton, 35" bore Tsar cannon. Wouldn't want to get hit by an almost 3' diameter cannon ball. It could make for a very bad day. I wonder how much powder this thing used per round? The recoil must have also been something.

Can't help but wonder how many rounds before that bronze barrel blew apart.
 
IMG_0914.JPG IMG_0915.JPG
Is that a half scale? Is so, why not full scale? THIS is artillery!!

The_Tsar_Cannon_July2004.jpg



Small potatoes
What about........?
The German Heavy Gustav was the largest gun ever built. It was more than 150 feet long, 40 feet tall and weighed almost 1,500 tons. The steel giant Krupp A.G. made only two, and neither worked well.

The weapon derived from experience. After witnessing the success of other railway guns, the German High Command asked Krupp’s engineers to design a weapon to destroy the French border fortifications along the Maginot Line.

The Gustav’s barrel alone was more than 100 feet long and fired 31-inch-wide, 12-foot-long shells at an effective ranges of 20 miles. The ammo came in two varieties — a five-ton explosive round and a seven-ton armor piercer.

But the impressively massive superweapons were dinosaurs. It was too bulky, took too long to fire and required hundreds of troops to operate. For centuries, better artillery meant bigger artillery, but that changed during World War II.





Bigger IS better??
 
The Gustav’s barrel alone was more than 100 feet long and fired 31-inch-wide, 12-foot-long shells at an effective ranges of 20 miles. The ammo came in two varieties — a five-ton explosive round and a seven-ton armor piercer.

A .45-70 is easier to cart around.
 
View attachment 234238


I just had too. These are so good looking, if I do say so myself, and by far my favorite cartridge to load for:

540 grs paper patched slicks at .459" over 71.5 grs Old Eynsford 1.5 Fg. For my Pedersoli Rolling Block.

(45 acp for comparison)
RP what paper are you using? Those look like "Greasers" bullets? I size the Postell down to .452 and dbl wrap for a .458. I have a paper patch chamber in a Sharps Gemmer .45-110-535. I have been using 30/1 alloy and Air Mail cotton paper wiped with egg whites. Nice looking bullets.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top