At least Fort Smith City PD is being honest......

Status
Not open for further replies.

hillbilly

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Messages
3,165
Location
Iowa
Here's the deal.

A Fort Smith city board member gets pulled over for suspected DUI.

He's got alcohol on his breath.

He gets "preferential treatment" and instead of being hauled in, he's given a ride to an IHOP.

A few hours later, the city board member, now even more intoxicated, is arrested after rear-ending the same parked car twice on the side of the road.

And the Fort Smith city PD actually ADMITS that they gave preferential treatment because of his job and status!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wow.......will wonders never cease???????????


http://www.kfsm.com/Global/story.asp?S=4174834


Police say proper procedure was followed with city administrator
Nov 28, 2005, 05:28 PM CST Email to a Friend Printer Friendly Version



FORT SMITH--The Fort Smith city administrator arrested for drunk driving and leaving the scene of an accident is on administrative leave and the city's board of directors will consider his future employment. Police say after a traffic stop Sunday morning, Bill Harding was given preferential treatment by getting a ride in a patrol car to IHOP, but they say proper procedure was followed in his arrest less than four hours later.

“As far as Mr. Harding was treated differently, of course he was treated differently, he's an employee of the city. He’s the city administrator. It would be naïve for me to say we handled this call just like anybody else would, we didn't and we wouldn't,” Sgt. Jarrard Copeland of the Fort Smith police said.

Police say special treatment was given to him after his first traffic stop just after seven Sunday morning, near the intersection of Old Greenwood Road and Savannah Street where an officer saw him cross the center line.

Although the officer who pulled the city administrator over, smelled alcohol on Harding, he determined he wasn't intoxicated, but didn't want him to continue driving, so he drove Harding to his destination in a patrol car, something unusual, but it didn't violate police policy because Harding is a city employee.

Harding was on his way to meet Board of Director member, Ken Pyle at the restaurant. Pyle declined to go on camera but said he offered Harding a ride home after two hours at the restaurant. Pyle said Harding wanted to get his car, and he said Harding was in a better state to drive. He drove him to his vehicle and then followed him home.

According to Pyle, Harding arrived home at about 9:30 a.m. Less than an hour and a half later, Harding was arrested outside of Harvest Time Tabernacle, after reportedly hitting a parked car, and driving drunk.

Now his action is forcing city leaders to take the necessary steps to keep the city moving forward. “The reality is that we have a responsibility to the 80 thousand citizens. We’ll discuss it in a closed door meeting we'll arrive at a decision that's best for the city,” city director Velvet Medlock-Graham said.

Pyle said he was unsure if Harding would be at the personnel meeting or if the board would make it’s decision tomorrow, but he said it would do what’s best for the city.

Harding has worked for the city of Fort Smith for 21 years. He will be arraigned Wednesday.
 
Police say special treatment was given to him after his first traffic stop just after seven Sunday morning, near the intersection of Old Greenwood Road and Savannah Street where an officer saw him cross the center line.

When you're drunk at 7am on Sunday you're definitely in need of serious rehab. :mad:
 
Yet when involved in a routine traffic stop in Barling (just outside of Fort Smith), it took three cars and six cops to determine that indeed, I was merely speeding. A few years ago, but typical. I'd have loved to be on city council then!

jmm
 
These courtesies are nothing new. I don't know if any of you ever frequent the police officers forums but a lot of officers will not arrest another officer for DUI, no matter how drunk. A ride home is typically given. Its no surprise that this professional courtesy is given to a council member. Although it is a surprise that they admitted it.
 
jkswiss.....that's it exactly.

It's one thing for a city PD to give "preferential treatment" to city officials.

It's quite something else for a city PD to blatantly admit, in front of TV cameras, that they hold double standards, and have no inkling whatsoever about the impropriety of that admission.

He not only just plain says it, he even reaffirms that: "It would be naïve for me to say we handled this call just like anybody else would, we didn't and we wouldn't,”


The fact that this guy can say this so openly, and not even realize the potential controversy it could cause, shows precisely and exactly that he works for a government of the good ol' boys, by the good ol' boys, and for the good ol' boys, that is used to doing pretty much whatever it damn well pleases to do, and that all concerns over propriety or even the illusion of good faith can go straight to Hell.

For an analogy......It's one thing to lay in your own living room floor in your underwear and eat potato chips that you just pile up on your own naked, hairy chest.

It's something else entirely to lay down in your underwear and eat potato chips that you just pile up on your own naked, hairy chest at city hall, in front of TV cameras.

Again, it's not the fact that this happened that I find so shocking.

It's the cavalier, "aw shucks" manner in which it is admitted to in front of TV cameras.

hillbilly
 
jkswiss said:
These courtesies are nothing new. I don't know if any of you ever frequent the police officers forums but a lot of officers will not arrest another officer for DUI, no matter how drunk. A ride home is typically given. Its no surprise that this professional courtesy is given to a council member. Although it is a surprise that they admitted it.
Courtesy! COURTESY! That's an interesting choice of WORD!

It's not a courtesy it's a case of some people being above the law pure and simple. It's an abusive use of police discretion pure and simple.

It's WRONG - pure and simple!

AND YEAH! It ticks me the :cuss: off. And some LEO's wonder why a sizable portion of the general public has ZERO respect for them... :fire: It may be the way the world works but that sure as :cuss: doesn't make it right. :mad:
 
“As far as Mr. Harding was treated differently, of course he was treated differently, he's an employee of the city. He’s the city administrator. It would be naïve for me to say we handled this call just like anybody else would, we didn't and we wouldn't,” Sgt. Jarrard Copeland of the Fort Smith police said.
Lovely. Remember, everyone, you are not as important as your elected official. You are not entitled to the same rights or treatment.
 
I heard this morning on the radio that the High Sheriff of a neighboring county (Butler County, Ohio) was pulled over for speeding (17 mph over) in his personal car by a female junior deputy who became a little befuddled on how to handle the situation. To his credit, he instructed her to issue a citation, same as she would anyone else. I'm sure he could have claimed to be on official business oe some such. I hope that it was not just the dash cam that kept him honest.
 
Being a nation of laws, and not of men, begins with the police departments. When crap like this happens, we are the latter and not the former. This is why I laugh when a politician refers to himself (or herself) as "a public servant." BS. You aren't a servant unless you are willing to bear burdens the normal person doesn't. Expecting preferential treatment is being an overlord, not a servant.

My hat is off to those LEOs who are willing to not only treat other officials as they would treat an "average citizen," but who are also willing to accept the treatment that said average citizen would receive. Too bad there aren't more of them.
 
Hey, here's the best part, for those of you not familiar with "city director" position.

The guy who was pulled over is NOT an "elected" official.

He's an appointed official.

The "directors" get appointed by the "Board of Directors."

It's the board that gets elected.

But the guy who was pulled over in this case isn't even an "elected" official.

hillbilly
 
Werewolf said:
Courtesy! COURTESY! That's an interesting choice of WORD!

It's not a courtesy it's a case of some people being above the law pure and simple. It's an abusive use of police discretion pure and simple.

It's WRONG - pure and simple!

AND YEAH! It ticks me the :cuss: off. And some LEO's wonder why a sizable portion of the general public has ZERO respect for them... :fire: It may be the way the world works but that sure as :cuss: doesn't make it right. :mad:
A professional courtesy is just what its called amongst LEO's. Thats the proper lingo for letting another LEO off the hook, not a word I chose to use.
 
Re:Equality

In this greatest Nation on Gods Green Earth We are all Equal.
Some of us are just more equal then others:barf:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top