Speedo66
Member
This article shows an attempt by other users of federal and state public land to restrict the rights of shooters on the lands. While the article doesn't overtly push in one direction, there are more interviews with the antis, and just the fact it's front page news is telling. Throw in buzz words like "endangering Indian petroglyphs" and a certain segment of the population will be sure to pick up on this and find a new cause to rally behind.
There's also mention made of the amount of refuse left behind, and that's one aspect I can get behind. They coin it "trigger trash", nice catch phrase for the antis. You brought it, you shot it, take it back out with you. Don't make a dumping ground of public land, or any land for that matter, that's not yours. I'm personally disgusted by finding trash left over by anyone when I'm out, shooters included.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/19/u...t-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
There's also mention made of the amount of refuse left behind, and that's one aspect I can get behind. They coin it "trigger trash", nice catch phrase for the antis. You brought it, you shot it, take it back out with you. Don't make a dumping ground of public land, or any land for that matter, that's not yours. I'm personally disgusted by finding trash left over by anyone when I'm out, shooters included.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/19/u...t-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0