WHY???
Why are the numbers jumping???
Aren't polls conducted at an accumulative scale???
I didn't think it could go 80-20, 50-50, then 60-40 when there's way more voters for one side than there are for the other...
Why not just say:
"In a poll we skewed to our favor, we found that the majority of our ignorant and uninformed readers decided that as nobody supports allowing you to own an assault weapon, you don't need one."
The 2a clearly states:
"... the right of the people to keep and bear ARMS shall not be infringed."
If they didn't want it to be read liberally it would have stated:
"Because standing armies are dangerous to liberty in times of peace, and due to the fact that the regular army is answerable to and takes it's commands from, the Federal government, each person, of able body and proper age for the requirements of militia service, has the right to keep and bear upon their person, concealed or otherwise, a weapon suitable to their own personal defense, and, should the need arise, to defend the land from usurpation and tyranny, both foreign, and domestic.
If only the sheeple would read the second as liberally as they do the first.
Would they allow a ban on any writing instrument but those that were available in 1776?
How about the fact that you are not allowed to worship any "religion" you choose, but that the 1a only refers to freedom from religious persecution?
Read it and weep, for those that wrote it surely are...