AWB question

Status
Not open for further replies.

BB62

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2004
Messages
367
Location
Ohio
This article appeared in my local newspaper.

I found it be be mostly accurate and balanced, except for two things - 1) the final paragraph, and the sentence below. Can someone verify that the sentence below is inaccurate?

Thanks!

"• The ban, part of the Gun Control Act, made it illegal to make, transfer or possess 19 different specific firearms - all of them semiautomaticguns, not fully automatic."

Any other comments appreciated. I am sending a note to the writer, and want to make sure my facts are straight.


BB62


End of ban brings confusion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Police, gun sellers don't expect crime wave

By Jane Prendergast
Enquirer staff writer


The expiration Monday of a 10-year national ban on assault weapons drew a lot of buzz, but local police and gun sellers say there will be little practical effect locally.


There are aspects that many people misunderstand, said Karen Denny, owner of Land, Air & Sea Inc., an outdoors store that sells weapons in Newport:

• The ban, part of the Gun Control Act, made it illegal to make, transfer or possess 19 different specific firearms - all of them semiautomaticguns, not fully automatic.

• It never outlawed the sale of AK-47s and SKS assault rifles - Denny said she has sold those every week. Rather, the law restricted the manufacture and importation of new ones.

• A companion ban outlawed gun magazines - the devices that attach to firearms that house bullets - that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. That ban was also lifted at 12:01 a.m. Monday.

"The phone is ringing off the hook today," Denny said Monday afternoon. "People are wanting information. They just don't understand what it means."

She said she refers them to the federal government, via the Web site for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, www.atf.gov.

The International Association of Chiefs of Police called for members to urge their congressional delegates to extend the ban. But local police officers say they don't expect anything to change.

Gun owners who legally buy the weapons aren't usually those who cause problems with them.

The national police chiefs' group said failing to reauthorize the ban was a "significant step back'' for public safety.

Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, in Washington, D.C., - named for the press secretary to President Reagan who was shot and injured during a 1981 attempt on Reagan's life - said its analysis of U.S. Department of Justice records showed a 66 percent decline in incidents of assault weapons traced to crimes since the ban was enacted in 1994
 
The ban was part of the Violent Crime Control And Law Enforcement Act Of 1994. 19 specific firearms *and* manufacturers were noted...making the total number of actual firearms that were banned much greater. It did make it illegal to make, transfer, or possess such firearms, but that didn’t include firearms made before September 14, 1994.

I don’t know if the DOJ number is correct but it sounds about right. Two things are important to note, however. First, that all crime has been reduced by large amounts over the past 10 years. Second, the incident rate of crime where such weapons are used is about the same percentage today as it was 10 years ago.

Throwing out numbers without explanation is how people lie with statistics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top