CraigC
Sixgun Nut
You repeat the same nonsense in every thread like this. The 10mm is nowhere near the .41Mag, unless you look at the heaviest 10mm loads and the lightest .41 loads. The original .41Spl loads that Taffin tested in a friggin' Colt SAA 30yrs ago are comparable to the heaviest 10mm loads. Namely a 215gr at 1200fps. The .41Mag will do that with a 300gr.The 10mm is going to be with me. The Casull will end up getting left behind because it is too big. It is a better dedicated hunting handgun, but not my pick for large predator defense.
A 200 gr hardcast from a Glock 20 leaves the muzzle at pretty much the same speed as a 210 gr bullet from a 4" barreled 41 magnum. The numbers you see listed in ballistics charts are from 8" barrels and from 8" barrels 10mm can't compete, but in a practical carry size it matches 41mag, beats 357, and is closer to 44mag than you'd think. I get an honest 1300 fps with these in my G20.
The 10mm is not even on the same planet as the .44Mag. What the 10mm does with a 230gr bullet, the .44 does with a 355gr.
The G20 also stops being light once it's loaded. You're paying for those 16rds and a loaded G20 weighs the same as an all steel 1911 or a 4" 629MG. A Ruger Alaskan is a whopping 4oz heavier.