Beater/Truck rifle?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tough to beat a 18'' 870, but if a high powered rifle is more your liking then an old Savage 340 in 30-30 would be a great choice. They're built tough, won't cost more than $300 out the door, and open sights so you don't need to waist a scope on it. I recently sold mine to upgrade to a .270, but it was still a great gun. They might get a bum wrap because of their one-lug design, but you're fine with ANY factory ammo you would want to run through it.

Stevens also makes a very similar rifle called the 325, and I'm guessing that would be just as "Truck Worthy" as the Savage.
 
Remington 770 in .243 win. 277.00 cash money at wally world and its in a caliber from coyotes to pronghorn.
Maybe if he intends on beating stuff to death with the stock. The 770 detoured me so badly I refuse to buy any Remington products at all anymore. Pocket knife, gun oil anything with the Remington's name on it I steer clear of anymore.

My $0.02 from my experience.

I'd go Sks for a real beater.
 
If my Marlin 1894c in .357 wasn't so damn pretty I think it would make a great truck beater. You'd have to look hard to find scratches on my 30-30 so I'd probably go with the 870 myself.
 
Up here there seem to be a lot of beater stainless Mini-14's around.
 
All suggestions are really good ones.

I think I would check the laws of the state in which I intend to use this truck gun. In Colorado, you cannot have a loaded rifle, either with rounds in the magazine of the rifle or with a round in the chamber in your vehicle. A detachable magazine with this regulation seems a good idea, as it may be kept loaded so long as not inserted in the rifle and so long as no rounds in the chamber.

Else you are carrying an empty rifle and will have to load it before it can be put to use.

I suppose stripper clips for the SKS or some of the ex military type rifles would be handy to have.
 
Conceptually, today's truck gun fills roughly the same role (for me, at least) as the 19th century coach gun. So a short-barrelled SxS 12ga ought to still serve nicely.
 
Why all the SKS recomendations for a truck gun??? Look at rifle the OP asked about and you will get an idea of his train of thought. An SKS is about as far from the Savage Hog Hunter .308 as you can get. The only thing an SKS does is reliabley sling lead down range. It is not accurate nor powerful enough for much more than what it was designed for. An easy and inexpensive to manufacture rifle to put in the hands of conscripted cannon fodder. Just enough stopping power to kill an enemy combatent if you happen to hit him center of mass. I am currently down to about 18 SKS rifles and only three have ever been taken out of the box, cosmoline cleaned out and fired. 100% reliable, 100% innacurate and now way over priced and why I am selling them like the trade bait they were bought for. Glad to see them go and using the money to buy nice rifles.

For the OP, I never owned a Savage rifle till recently. Always thought they were low priced decent rifles for those who couldn't afford a nicer option. After shooting their new .338 Lapua Mag Tactical Rifle I ordered one. We only had 400 yard range that day but even with a breeze, all rounds grouped in the x ring in a group easily covered by the palm of my hand with factory ammo. Two weeks ago I purchased a model 40 single shot in .22 Hornet and with a Leupold 6x-18x it drives tacks. I believe I see your intent. A handy all purpose rifle that is inexpensive enough to throw behind the seat of your truck for targets of opportunity. My carry pistol will do most of what an SKS will do while much more elegant and compact.

A rifle should be able to reliably put rounds on target and kill things to at least 200 yards. I can usually hit things at 200 yards with an SKS but am not going to bet on exact bullet placement or a clean kill. That Savage in 308 will surely do that. I would mount a 2x-7x scout style scope with quick release mounts in the event it gets squashed by a tire tool or hammer and need to use the iron sights. I have a similar setup under the back seat of my pickup.

My truck rifle is a Stainless Winchester Model 70 Featherweight in 308 with a Burris 2x-7x Scout Scope. Very lightweight, no worries about excessive maintenance and first shot accurate. Not a bench rest rifle by any means but if I have to carry it for any distance it is super light and when needed, puts a bullet exactly where I expect with the power to stop up to any medium game.

With the barrel length of my rifle/load combo, the point blank range on deer size targets is 275 yards. So assuming a 10" kill zone with it zeroed at 150 yards, you can put the crosshairs on the kill zone without doping for elevation at any range from the muzzle to 275 yards and get a solid hit. If you run your load over a chronograph and plug your exact velocity and bullet into any decent ballistics software, (even free phone apps for this), you can dope a bit and have a solid 350 yard rifle. I would assume the Savage Hog Gun would be very similar.
 
If I felt the need to carry a general purpose rifle in my vehicle I think a good choice would be a Model 94 in 30-30. Flat, easy to store behind a truck seat, powerful enough to do what you would ever likely want to do with it, fairly fast shooting without the "OMG! He's got an "assault rifle" reflex.
 
An eight shot maverick 88 makes a great truck gun. it has enough firepower to disperse a crowd. It hold a pattern well enough to dispatch coyotes and other pests. Loaded with buckshot a Maverick 88 holds a pattern as well as any shotgun, bar none. I don't care how much you paid for it. Before every deer season my Maverick 88 makes some Ithaca or browning owner say my shotgun doesn't like that type ammo.
 
Truck Gun

My run around beater is an old Revelation (Marlin) 30-30 I bought back around 1970 for $50. Killed a lot of deer and hogs with it.
 
Why all the SKS recomendations for a truck gun??? Look at rifle the OP asked about and you will get an idea of his train of thought. An SKS is about as far from the Savage Hog Hunter .308 as you can get. The only thing an SKS does is reliabley sling lead down range. It is not accurate nor powerful enough for much more than what it was designed for. An easy and inexpensive to manufacture rifle to put in the hands of conscripted cannon fodder. Just enough stopping power to kill an enemy combatent if you happen to hit him center of mass. I am currently down to about 18 SKS rifles and only three have ever been taken out of the box, cosmoline cleaned out and fired. 100% reliable, 100% innacurate and now way over priced and why I am selling them like the trade bait they were bought for. Glad to see them go and using the money to buy nice rifles.

For the OP, I never owned a Savage rifle till recently. Always thought they were low priced decent rifles for those who couldn't afford a nicer option. After shooting their new .338 Lapua Mag Tactical Rifle I ordered one. We only had 400 yard range that day but even with a breeze, all rounds grouped in the x ring in a group easily covered by the palm of my hand with factory ammo. Two weeks ago I purchased a model 40 single shot in .22 Hornet and with a Leupold 6x-18x it drives tacks. I believe I see your intent. A handy all purpose rifle that is inexpensive enough to throw behind the seat of your truck for targets of opportunity. My carry pistol will do most of what an SKS will do while much more elegant and compact.

A rifle should be able to reliably put rounds on target and kill things to at least 200 yards. I can usually hit things at 200 yards with an SKS but am not going to bet on exact bullet placement or a clean kill. That Savage in 308 will surely do that. I would mount a 2x-7x scout style scope with quick release mounts in the event it gets squashed by a tire tool or hammer and need to use the iron sights. I have a similar setup under the back seat of my pickup.

My truck rifle is a Stainless Winchester Model 70 Featherweight in 308 with a Burris 2x-7x Scout Scope. Very lightweight, no worries about excessive maintenance and first shot accurate. Not a bench rest rifle by any means but if I have to carry it for any distance it is super light and when needed, puts a bullet exactly where I expect with the power to stop up to any medium game.

With the barrel length of my rifle/load combo, the point blank range on deer size targets is 275 yards. So assuming a 10" kill zone with it zeroed at 150 yards, you can put the crosshairs on the kill zone without doping for elevation at any range from the muzzle to 275 yards and get a solid hit. If you run your load over a chronograph and plug your exact velocity and bullet into any decent ballistics software, (even free phone apps for this), you can dope a bit and have a solid 350 yard rifle. I would assume the Savage Hog Gun would be very similar.

I have never picked up an SKS that wouldn't group at least 4-5MOA with really crappy ball ammunition (that was the worst one, only one was worse than 3-4 MOA). Most would group around 2MOA with good commercially loaded ammunition. I got news for you, if you throw some crappy surplus ammunition through that Savage Hog Hunter, it's not going to group much better than your average SKS (however, a lot more of the 7.62x51 surplus you find is higher quality than the majority of the 7.62x39 surplus out there). With your '10" kill zone criteria' and '200 yard requirement' you only need a 5MOA rifle to get the job done. It's going to be a very hard task to find an SKS that won't do at least that with good ammo.

I don't know why you went nuts hating on the 7.62x39 cartridge either. It fires an equivalent caliber and weight bullet faster than the .30-30, and due to the respective shapes of the bullets, the difference only continues to grow in favor of the 7.62x39 as it moves downrange. If you don't like the 7.62x39, you must hate the traditional American sportsman's round of choice: the .30-30.

One other huge point in favor of the SKS: reliability under abusive conditions. Yes, it was built for conscripts. Conscripts who had never been taught to clean a weapon. Conscripts who were serving in the bitter cold of Siberia, or the harsh desert expanses of Central Asia, or the tropical jungles of Africa. They're designed to get as dirty as you can possible imagine, and still function every time you pull the trigger. There's no pot metal parts, or aluminum, or non-lined bores to worry about. The Savage, although a fine and accurate rifle, was designed with non of that in mind. The Savage also has very poor iron sights, and you do NOT want a scope on a gun that's going to be thrown behind the seat and forgotten about. Even if somehow it does manage to stay zeroed, you're still going to have to wonder about it every time you have to pull it out and use it. The worst iron sights in the world are still better than a broken or wandering scope.

Grab an SKS or a Marlin 336. If you want a "battle rifle" to reach out further than 200 yards, get an old Mauser or Enfield bolt action. They too are designed to function under adverse conditions, fire a more powerful round than the SKS, generally do it more accurately, and are a lot cheaper than a new Savage or equivalent gun. They also come with rugged built in iron sights.
 
Kimber Swede

Get a Kimber of Oregon refurbed/sporterized Sweed in 6.5 x 55. I have seen them for $275-$325 range in Fort Worth. I have two bought in that price range. Nice old military barrels, one of them shoots MOA at 100 yards. I saw another one before Christmas but did not have the heart to get a third. Changed my mind and went back but it was gone. It was $275 and better condition than my other two. Oh well.
 
Last edited:
Why all the SKS recomendations for a truck gun??? Look at rifle the OP asked about and you will get an idea of his train of thought. An SKS is about as far from the Savage Hog Hunter .308 as you can get. The only thing an SKS does is reliabley sling lead down range. It is not accurate nor powerful enough for much more than what it was designed for. An easy and inexpensive to manufacture rifle to put in the hands of conscripted cannon fodder. Just enough stopping power to kill an enemy combatent if you happen to hit him center of mass. I am currently down to about 18 SKS rifles and only three have ever been taken out of the box, cosmoline cleaned out and fired. 100% reliable, 100% innacurate and now way over priced and why I am selling them like the trade bait they were bought for. Glad to see them go and using the money to buy nice rifles.
Yeah, the SKS and the 7.62x39 won't kill anything. I don't know what anyone was thinking. end/sarcasm

C686D6C0-809A-45A6-93FD-7AFA33D4B88A-551-00000110F5D8FDC8.jpg

AC906E9D-9F8C-4DD9-AD75-F07F67F8B492-551-000001111B839A99.jpg


E7669936-E721-4423-B0B8-B0AFB4DB8E9E-551-000001112492044A.jpg

E8A058CB-622A-4CCE-997F-F2086364A107-551-000001110F43360C.jpg

If you had ever actually hunted with one of those 18 SKS's then you'd know that much of what you wrote isn't true. Not to mention the fact that it might be pressed into service in self defense and if facing multiple armed criminals I'd prefer to have a semi-auto vs a bolt action.
 
I don't know why you went nuts hating on the 7.62x39 cartridge either. It fires an equivalent caliber and weight bullet faster than the .30-30, and due to the respective shapes of the bullets, the difference only continues to grow in favor of the 7.62x39 as it moves downrange. If you don't like the 7.62x39, you must hate the traditional American sportsman's round of choice: the .30-30.

Now, hold on. I'm no SKS hater nor do I disrespect the 7.62x39 in the right time and place. But suggesting that it is equal to, let alone superior to, the .30-30 ? I'm calling shenanigans. :neener:


Weight*******************.30-30 Vel*************7.62x39 Vel

110 gr ********************2631*******************2558
125 (30-30) 123 (7.62/39)*****2625*******************2411
150**********************2300********************2101
170 (3030)*****************2150********************????

All published data, not my secret recipe. And, as you note, that is in reference to RN or FP bulllets in the 30-30. Move to Leverevolution and polymer tip bullets for the 30-30 and:

160 gr FTX******************2389


I do not speak ill of the 7.62x39 or SKS. Evidence from the photos above proves its efficacy on big game. However, with regard to its relationship to the 30-30, I will refer to the immortal words of MC Hammer: "Can't touch this" ;)
 
If it were me and I was looking for a beater/truck gun, then something like an SKS rifle (a short barreled Norinco Paratrooper model would do fine), or else an old Marlin Glenfield 30-30 lever action, would be the way I would go. If it was something else other than a rifle, then my Maverick 88 12 gauge with its 18" barrel would fill the bill quite nicely as well.
 
Dang, I could have swore that I looked at that the other day and it was the other way around. Looks like I got the two mixed up.

My Lyman #49 shows 125 grn 30-30 from 2265fps to 2625fps. The 2625 is an outlier though. Everything else is mid 2500s and down, in fact, only two loads are in the 2500 fps bracket. The rest of the loads are in the low 2400 fps and mid 2300 fps range. The 123grn 7.62x39 loads are also in the low 2400 fps to mid 2300 fps range. Yep, if you handload, you might get an extra 100-150 fps out of the .30-30. I'm betting factory ammo is just about as even as it gets.

Not to mention, even if you give the .30-30 that 200 fps head start, it only takes 100 yds for them to be going the same velocity due to the better BC of the x39. The .30-30 has a better selection of heavier weight bullets, but the bigger you get the slower they go.

My original argument is that the 7.62x39 and .30-30 have virtually identical performance. A x39 should do everything a .30-30 will. That's why I can't understand hating on the SKS when .30-30s are so popular?
 
Looks like some ruffled feathers. Never said an SKS would never kill anything, I have heard tale of desperate folk defending themselves successfully from a Grizzly with a knife. Guy near me got arrested by game and fish for killing a black bear throwing a piece of fire wood at it when it wandered into his campsite. What I said is that for a general purpose rifle as the OP asked about, an SKS is not even comparable. Nor is 7.62x39 comparable to .308. I pulled these numbers from same reference for consistency. That said, my reference at hand may be different than your but the numbers are going to be close.

Muzzle
154 grain 7.62 x 39 velocity 2,104 fps with 1,516 ft/lbs energy
150 grain .308 Winchester 2,820 fps with 2,648 ft/lbs energy

Bullet drop/Energy with rifles sighted in at 150 yards:
7.62x39 .308 Winchester
50 yds +2.38"/1200...............50 yds +1.12"/2152
100 yds +2.76"/951..............100 yds +1.39"/1751
150 yds 0.00"/750................150 yds 0.00"/1412
200 yds - 6.00"/595..............200 yds -3.46"/1126
250 yds -18.51"/481..............250 yds - 9.51"/891
300 yds -36.46"/404..............300 yds -18.82"/703
350 yds -61.75"/352..............350 yds -32.26"/559
400 yds -95.46"/314..............400 yds -50.91"/454

Looking at the "numbers" we are comparing apples to oranges. Other than outside diameter the ballistics of the two cartridges are not even close. The 308 makes more roughly the same energy at 200 yards as the 7.62x39 in a SKS does at 50 yards. At 250 yards the 7.62x39 has roughly double the bullet drop as the 308. Math is not personal, it is just math. Double the energy at conceivable hunting ranges and half the bullet drop is just better.

That is not to say that getting shot wih an SKS at 200 yards isn't going to suck. Sure it would be a real buzz killer. A shot through the heart with an SKS at 200 yards would be better than a shot in the butt at the same range with a 308. But the inherent accuracy of a milled turn bolt in 308 is much greater than a stamped SKS.

I based my choice on the OP's direct mention of a .308 turn bolt of a particular flavor. The weird thing is his idea is almost a dead ringer for the truck rifle I have been using for over a decade. Thus my affinity for and knowledge of how well that combination works. With my full size government model carry pistol I can hit 10 out of 10 shots at 100 yards. It is part of my regular drill. Of course a .45 acp is not toting much energy at 100 yards but if someone is that far away I am probably not in defensive mode as most defensive situations happen in the less than 25 foot range.

So all I was questioning is why so many people started shouting SKS, SKS, SKS, SKS when thread started with idea of turn bolt rifle. It seems like the majority of the shooting community is in either a AR-15 or SKS frenzy. Why take a marginal mass produced military weapon hunting unless it is the only gun you own. It is like framing a house with a chinese hammer out of the 99 cent bargin tool bin. An SKS makes for a fine general purpose defensive weapon. Its why I bought one a month for over two years when they were less than 100 bucks. Once they went over a c-note per unit I stopped buying them. Putting a plastic stock and a big magazine on it does not change what it is. If I were putting that type weapon in my truck i would choose an AR-15 long before an SKS. Better yet my M1a Scout but then we are back into a 308, oops.

Cal30 sniper wrote:
I don't know why you went nuts hating on the 7.62x39 cartridge either. It fires an equivalent caliber and weight bullet faster than the .30-30, and due to the respective shapes of the bullets, the difference only continues to grow in favor of the 7.62x39 as it moves downrange. If you don't like the 7.62x39, you must hate the traditional American sportsman's round of choice: the .30-30.

No, I am not a hater. Just a realist. I own a few very nice 30-30's. One Henry Brass & Blue with Octagonal barrel, a 99% pre 1964 Model 1894 Winchester, a NIB 94 manufacture date 1969 and an old beater Marlin that was my Dad's. That said, I have the same opinion of the 30-30 ballistics of the standard SKS. Given the choice between the two for the only gun I could own, I would take the Model 94. That said, last time I shot a 30-30 was over 25 years ago with my Dad. Respect the rifle/caliber combonation as the most produced centerfire rifle in America I believe but not going to put one in the truck and carry it around. Anything I can do with a 30-30, I can do better with something else. Doesn't mean I don't want someone proficient with thier old lever gun shooting at me either.

So yes, you can kill an animal with any of the discussed calibers. You can even do it at a fair range if your a decent shot. That said, the 308 Winchester in a turnbolt will do it better than the other two from 75 yards on any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
 
My beater is a Winchester 30-30 I bought from a pawn shop my SR year of HS. I bought a new one in case this one ever decides to quit running, but so far that hasn't happened. I think I paid $150 for it, but that is about tops for all the beaters my friends have. Most have odd single shots they picked up along the way for under a $100 in calibers like 303, 20g, and 257 Roberts from auctions to pawn shops.
 
I don't see why a rifle left in a truck has to take a beating. Lay it in a blanket and fold it over to protect it. That being said a Winchester 94 in 30-30 would be a good choice just about anywhere. A 357 magnum levergun would be another option.

And to whoever posted a picture of that chopped Mosin; I want one!
 
What does one do with a "truck gun"? Clearly not something an NJ resident could concern themselves with, being illegal to take a gun anywhere in a vehicle except directly to a shooting range and a couple of other exceptions.
 
SKS, Mini 30, Camp Carbine, M-1 carbine, FR-8, Mossberg 590, AR light-weight CAR (.223 & 9mm) and "Tanker" Garand have all been at one time or another a beater truck gun though sometimes in a Jeep, snowmobile, canoe and even a Cessna 150.
 
Doc7, I would move if in that situation but where I am from a truck rifle for me is this... Something I can easily access in the event of an encounter with a pack of wild dogs chasing cattle or my dogs, a ground hog in the neighbors garden, a trophy buck seen in the middle of a work day, crows in a corn patch, a coyote anywhere/anytime, a stubborn black bear in the garbage cans, any animal hit by a car limping into the woods, non domesticated flea infested cat, etc. Thus I want something that will dispatch varmints to medium game at a variety of ranges with a relative chance of getting the job done. So a scout type rifle in a caliber that is general purpose in nature but accurate and tough is my choice. A crow at 150 yards is a challenging shot. A big deer at the other end of a pasture at twilight is another. I can't see plinking a crow at over 100 yards with an SKS. My truck rifle gets used frequently for a very wide range of tasks and must be capable to accomplish the mission or have to take a pass on targets of opportunity. One other important aspect is for it to be very docile in appearance. My little scout rifle may be seen by a deputy at a road block. Big magazines and bayonets are quite legal but may give cause for more than a casual glance. Round here a small turn bolt arouses no suspicion. An AR-15 and a stop by a rookie cop can be cause for inconvenience.
 
Funny, no one asked the OP where he lived, what kind of game he might encounter, or just generally what the rifle might be used for, etc. Everyone jumps on the SKS bandwagon without even knowing.

I owned three Yugo SKS's at one time and they were decently accurate especially after bedding them and installing Tech Sights. But one day it occured to me that I was toting a rifle that was comparable in weight and length to a Garand, yet fired a cartridge less powerful than a 30-30. Suddenly I realized how counter-productive that really was. I bought a 20" Saiga to replace it. Yes, I'm still stuck with the 7.62x39, but at least it's in a smaller package.

So to the beater gun question. When I'm knocking around the pasture behind the house, my truck gun is usually a lever rifle; either my Rossi 92 .357 or my Ubert '73 in .44 Special. This because it pretty brushy and I can't see too far due to this. If I'm out in west Texas, hands down my FR-8 Scout. Short and handy enough to manuever out of the cab of a pickup, yet more than powerful enough to handle anything I might encounter out to 350 yds. or so.

Without know the OP's circumstance, I really like the ideas of the Argentine Mausers in '06. What more could a fella ask for unless he has fantasies of fighting off hoardes of bad guys which we all know is pretty unrealistic.

35W
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top