Beretta 92 FS 9mm

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wolfman_556

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2008
Messages
189
Location
the forest
We got a flyer in the ads today from a local gun store.

They were advertising police trade Berettas.

So I drove up there to check them out.

Checked out one in very good mechanical condition. The bore was still crisp and bright, the safety/decock was excellent and so was the trigger & hammer action. The firing pin and everything else inside looked great... so I bought it ($300).

There's a lot of wear on the finish on the back of the grip, and it has an old heavily worn set of rubber Hogue grips on it which I'll replace soon.

Fired off two full 15 round clips when I got home. Flawless performance and VERY accurate. I'm very pleased with it.
 
It would be no problem for me to carve my own, but I think I'll just buy a set of factory originals in plastic.
 
You can usually find original 92FS grips on ebay for peanuts. The 92F magazine will fit.

$300 is a very good deal...........If I had only know this would happen when I paid MSRP back in Nov. 1991..........
 
Wolfman,
If these magazines are the ones you are talking about, I wish you would have asked. They appear to be the ones designed for a heel release.

The enlargement of this particular magazine appears to be one that can be used in either pistol, so you may get lucky.

Not to worry though, CDNN can either cancel your order, or you can modify them to work with the triggerguard mag release if needed.

Back when the Beretta 92 was undergoing military trials, the magazine release was raised to the triggerguard at the request of the US military. In the States this gun became the 92F. In Italy, the pistol still had a heel mag release. During the early days of the AWB, there were those of us who took the Italian 92F magazines and cut a notch in them to allow them to be used on the American 92FS guns. I still have a couple of my Italian 92F mags that were modified thusly.

Yep......compared my old ones to the screen and apparently the "sand resistant" hole is the old Italian 92F mag release hole. The uper slot is cut in the correct place though.
 
Good for you!

Are 92F mags compatible with a 92FS?Are 92F mags compatible with a 92FS?

Yes they are compatiable, as are mags from the 92SB (predecessor of the 92F series).

All the best,
Glenn B
 
Yes they are compatiable, as are mags from the 92SB (predecessor of the 92F series).

The 90-Two magazines fit as well. They will fit any 92 that uses a full-size double stack magazine and has the magazine release behind the trigger guard.
 
The Sand Resistant mags advertised by CDNN do fit and function in a Beretta 92FS - they are not for heel release guns
 
I compared CDNN's Italian Beretta mags I ordered to the italian mag that's in the pistol and they look identical.

It came with two extra mags of american make which do not have the extra hole.

They're heavily used and a little beat up but they still function fine.
 
My three new mags arrived in the mail today.

They are blued steel , 15 round, made by Meccanica Del Sarca, and distributed by Beretta.

They fit and function perfectly.
 
The Sand Resistant mags advertised by CDNN do fit and function in a Beretta 92FS - they are not for heel release guns

If that is correct, those mags should probably fit in all doble stack versions of the model 92 series that were manufactured after 1981, from the 92SB up through the current models.

Here is some info found at Gunpedia (wish I knew about this site before, looks interesting). I will not swear to correctness, but it appears to be on the money regarding the models I have seen (found at http://guns.wikia.com/wiki/Beretta_92)

Below is a brief list of most important modifications and versions produced in the 92-series over last 30 years:

Beretta 92S (1976) – first modification of the basic model 92, with non-ambidextrous slide-mounted safety/decocker and magazine release button set low in the left grip panel. It was replaced in production by the Model 92SB.

Beretta 92SB (1981) – further evolution of model 92S, initially designated Model 92S-1, later designated 92SB with the introduction of the firing pin block. The manual safety is ambidextrous, the magazine release relocated to the base of the trigger-guard. Discontinued since 1991.

Beretta 92SB-C (1981) – Compact version of the model 92SB. Overall length was 197 mm, barrel length 103 mm, magazine capacity 13 rounds (also accepted standard 15-round magazines).

Beretta 92SB-C type M (1983) – slimmer version of the model 92SB-C, with a single-stack magazine which held only 8 rounds.

Beretta 92F (1984) – initially designated 92SB-F, later renamed 92F. Evolved from the Model 92SB during American XM9 trials, with a slightly reshaped grip and trigger-guard, also a different finish. The barrel bore and chamber are chrome-plated.

Beretta 92G (1989)- the so called "Gendarmerie" version, created at the request of the Gendarmerie Nationale de France. Also manufactured under licence in France by GIAT Industries as the PA MAS G1. The pistol is the same as the model 92F except for the operations of the lever, which lost its safety lock function and is used only to safely decock the hammer.

Beretta 92FS (1989) – a minor modification of the Model 92F, with an enlarged hammer pin head which prevents the slide from flying back in the case of breakage. Presently, all US M9 pistols are modified to 92FS standard.

Beretta 92FS-C (1989) – compact version of the Model 92FS, similar in dimensions to earlier model 92SB-C. No longer made.

Beretta 92FS-C type M (1989) – single-stack version of Model 92FS-C, magazine capacity 8 rounds. No longer made.

Beretta 92DS (1990) – Double Action Only version of the Model 92FS, with spurless hammer and manual safety.

Beretta 92D (1990) - Double Action Only version of the Model 92FS, with spurless hammer and no manual safety levers.

Beretta 92FS Brigadier (1996) – version of the Model 92FS with a reinforced, thickened slide; another change is that the front sight is not integral to the slide, but is dovetailed into it.

Beretta 92FS Centurion (1996) – version of the Model 92FS with a shortened barrel and slide, the frame is the same as on the Model 92FS. Overall length is 197 mm, barrel length is 103 mm, magazine capacity 15 rounds.

Beretta 92 Vertec (2003) – version of the Model 92FS that addressed constant complaints about the excessive grip width of Model 92 pistols. The backstrap of the grip on Vertec models is made more linear; another change is the addition of an integral Picatinny rail to the frame.

Beretta 90two (2006) - a most recent face-lift version of the basic Model 92 design. Key changes are modular one-piece grip panels (available in various shapes), integral Picatinny rail under the barrel (with cover), restyled slide and integral recoil buffer built into action.

Beretta M9A1 (2006) - version of the M9 with an integrated Picatinny rail (for light and lasers) and aggressive checkering grips. Features a special magazine treated against Sand (PVD coating). Issued to the United States Marine Corps

I must admit, I do like my Berettas. I have owned about four to six Beretta Jetfires, one Beretta model 21, two Beretta 70S, one beretta 92SB, and two Beretta 92FS pistols.


All the best,
Glenn B
 
Last edited:
Speaking of grips for the Model 92.
I sure wish Ergo Grip would make grips for these guns like the kind they offer for 1911 pistols.
I think they would be about perfect, and unbreakable too!:)
 
I can assure you that CDNN's sand resistant magazines fit the 92FS - I have several of them. They are identical to normal Beretta factory magazines, with the exception of the finish, which is smooth, unlike the rougher phosphate finish of other factory mags.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top