Beretta 92FS: The Gun I'd Love to Hate....

Status
Not open for further replies.
The slide on the M9/92FS is so long that I learned to rack the slide using the front of the slide, just behind the barrel, rather than gripping the rear of the slide and inadvertently decock the pistol.
It can even be done from underneath if you have long fingers and a recently strong grip.

Officially, I was trained to use the slide release and not slingshot the slide, but as a lefty, I found my way of racking the slide easier and faster. With a traditional two handed grip, I don't even lose sight picture because it is all done with my support hand. Firing hand never changes position.
 
So why not practice malfunction drills, even if it has been 100% so far?

Then simply do whatever gives you the most confidence.
Exactly! Shooting the weapon with your carry ammo without malfunction gives you confidence that it is reliable. Practicing malfunction drills, in addition to range time, gives me confidence that I'm reliable
 
The only thing I almost dislike about the Beretta FS/9M is their fat butt. Other than that, mine have gone bang every time, with any ammo.
 
Wonderful, classic pistol but I could not learn the half-mile trigger. I wish they made a Glock with a quarter of the class a 92FS has
 
The 92 feels as bad as a Glock in my hand, but unlike the Glock, I shoot it well (after the first shot). Never could learn to like DA/SA operation, I shoot my Taurus PT-92 far more often.

Other than weight, the Beretta Steel-1 SAO is about perfect (very hard to find however).
 
dang 92 is so reliable I have never had the opportunity to practice malfunction drills.

Try reloading drunk (a joke, never do it!!!).
Three squibs this year, many ripped or bent copper coatings that jammed in the chamber. Other than this batch of fail, I have never had any malfunctions with any ammo.

With sufficiently flawed ammo even the 92 will fail :) The rear sight is great for banging against window frame or other wooden structure to get a jammed round out.

With the squibs the bullet jammed in the throat and prevented a new round from being chambered.
 
Love the 1911 a lot and shot one competitively. Was on active duty when we made the switch. Would have preferred the Sig for its size and the way it fits my hand, but really came to like the Beretta. Fits the hand well enough. Smooth trigger, easy to shoot accurately and extremely reliable. Never experienced any failure with my 92. I also really like how it looks - sinister, deadly and all business.
 
Love me some Beretta 92s :)

Line1_zpse5c6519a.jpg~original
 
The Beretta 92 is my favorite gun period. It's the one I learned to shoot on. And is also my night stand gun. My original 92FS has over 6k rounds since I bought it in 2009. It comes with me every time I shoot. I also have an M9A1 New. Wanted a 92 with a rail so I could mount a laser light combo on it for relief nightstand duty. That one is about two years old now. Just over 1k rounds.

I have small hands. When I started out shooting I was a 130lb 5'6" (165 weight lifter now) weakling. Guns were cool to me. But never understood the fanatics/enthusiasts. And I was slightly intimated by firearms. Even though by that time at 28years old I had shot many guns. The Beretta and I just connected and I've been an addict ever since.

I have had failures with mine. Mag related or lack of cleaning usually. They are few and far between. I have a 20rd mec gar and 32rd pro mag(it holds 34) that are just silly fun and have been more reliable than my stock mags.

Eventually I'd like to have one of every variant. I am really anxious to shoot one of the vertec, single stack and elite versions. Though the next on my list is the new inox compact.

I carry a Ruger SR9c. Not sure why anyone would try to conceal carry a full size anything LOL

Cliff notes: love my 92's and can't wait to add more!
 
While this is certainly possible, I would think you would have to almost do this on purpose. I cannot conceive of any method that I use personally to rack the slide that would result in the safety being engaged. Even in Injured dominant hand scenarios, the safety is engaged by pushing down on the lever. There is no reason why the backward motion of racking the slide would result in downward pressure on the safety unless you are trying to forcefully PUSH the slide forward instead of pulling back and releasing it.
...
The only way I could see it even pushing forward would be if you were pushing it from the back of the slide with your fingers directly over the safety.
...
If you spend that much time practicing tap and rack exercises and are still somehow flipping the safety on, what is the point of continuing the exercises?
I've seen a slide rack either engage a slide mounted (down for safe) safety accidentally or decock (down for decock) a decocker only gun. It can happen and it does happen. I've even done it myself a couple of times.

I can't figure out what you're talking about when you say that you'd have to push forward engage the safety. Pushing forward from the back would DIS-engage the safety. A backward motion (like a slide racking movement) would be what would tend to engage the safety, not pushing forward from the back.

Finally, it matters not what kind of manual safety a gun has, whether it moves up or down, around, in, out, over, forward, back, clockwise or counter-clockwise. Regardless of what kind it is, how it operates AND whether or not you ever intentionally engage it, you should ALWAYS include disengaging the safety as part of the action of presenting the firearm to the target.

That's because when you present the firearm to the target you mean to fire the gun and one of the CRITICAL steps in firing the gun is making sure the safety is disengaged. Unless the safety is completely disabled, there is the potential for it to have been engaged and therefore your firing procedure should insure that it is disengaged.

Failure to do that could be irritating, embarrassing, or even deadly.

If your gun has a manual safety, you should be practicing to disengage that safety EACH and EVERY time you bring it up to fire at a target.

By the way, here are a couple of my babies...

attachment.php
 
I really like mine. It is a little large to carry except under winter clothing, but it is solid as a rock, very reliable ( the only malfunctions I ever had were a couple of squibs from my inattention during a reloading session), and capable of very good accuracy when I am shooting well.
 
"Try reloading drunk (a joke, never do it!!!).
Three squibs this year, many ripped or bent copper coatings that jammed in the chamber. Other than this batch of fail, I have never had any malfunctions with any ammo.

With sufficiently flawed ammo even the 92 will fail :) The rear sight is great for banging against window frame or other wooden structure to get a jammed round out."


I fail to see the reason for risking damaging a gun by deliberately feeding it junk ammo. That said I reload most of my ammunition. The only exception is the premium ammunition I have purchased for S.D. My preferred brand is Cor-bon 124 gr. JHP+P. As I previously posted I have batch of old reloads that the primers required a second strike to fire yet the Beretta ate all of them up first time through.

Like I said the dang thing is just so reliable.
 
Last edited:
You don't have to apologize for liking or hating any gun, as they're such a subjective thing. For me, I find it difficult to like any plastic pistol. To me they're like hammers or screwdrivers. But when the Beretta first came out, I remember it was trashing all the other pistols in the military gun tests. Only one malfunction out of 2,000 rounds on average. The S&W 459, which was considered a "tie" in many respects, malfunctioned on an average of once every 952 times, if I recall correctly.

I have a Taurus PT92 stainless, and it's gorgeous. Then I have the Beretta 92 air pistol, which is a hoot.


Taurus_Beretta_Pellet_Small.gif

.
 
Where do you get belt-fed Beretta 92's?
I bought a case of linked .308 Portuguese ammo some years ago and while I was de-linking it, the idea for a picture hit me... :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top