Beretta Pico Range Report

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 17, 2013
Messages
1,685
Location
Illinois
OK, I'm back from the range with my new Pico. Before I say anything else I'll say this: I really like this gun. That said, I was all worked up over possible problems after having my FP fail right out of the box. I sent the gun to Beretta USA for warranty repair and they turned the gun over in 6 days over the Thanksgiving holiday. I shot 250 rounds this morning: 50 rounds of Fiocchi 95 gr. Ball, 50 rounds of Winchester Train and Defend "Train" ammunition and 150 rounds of hand loads. The hand loads are *hot* hand loads developed for my Wife's G42 and we have shot quite a few of them. Xtreme 100 gr. flat nose plated bullets in mixed brass over 3.8 gr. of Unique.

PicoAngleonTarget_zps66ebe00e.jpg

I don't own a chronograph but a range buddy shot 100 of these in his G42 and they clocked about 1080 fps. Hot.

We'll cut to the chase and end the suspense - I had not one single failure in 250 rounds. Flawless performance that started with 4 mags (24 rounds) of Fiocchi feeling the gun out. I find the recoil to be not so bad as I feared. Not near as bad as the Ruger LCP but not near as mild as the Glock 42...kinda medium. I shot offhand and managed some pretty decent groups at 21' of about 2". Then I started loading and shooting 6+1 and finished the box of Fiocchi and 50 rounds of Winchester moving the targets between 15' and 30' and progressing to triple taps and mag dumps while staying center mass on the torso targets at all ranges. She warmed up good and I opened a box of handloads and proceeded to train with the pistol having complete confidence in it.

PicoonBlue_zpsd8bb98e5.jpg

Continuing the load 6+1 I went to point shooting at 21' - this is how I really evaluate a SD pistol and the standard I'm looking for is to get consistent groups center mass that are generally covered by one hand (my palm is 4"across) and the get 3X in about 1 second. Flawless performance again and while the beginning groups were a little loose they tightened up as I gained familiarity.

I had a blast and would carry this gun (will carry this gun) based on today's performance. I let the LGS counter guy and range master test fire the gun for 2 mags as they are contemplating putting one in rental and one under the glass *but* were really upset when mine had the FP failure right out of the box. Judging by the reaction today I'd be suprised if we don't see one in stock next week. Matt at the LGS was surprised at how accurate the gun was in his hands and I was impressed....Dude put 'em on target very well but commented on the recoil. But he was shooting my hot Home Brew then so that would not surprise me.

I was pretty sure I'd not like the extended magazine but at the end of the day I don't have any bad things to say about the gun. I'll likely carry it with the short/flush mag and buy a few more of them. I'll add a pix or two to this post tomorrow of the gun and several targets. I wanted to also add that if you buy a Pico, be prepared to break it in or do as I did and take the pistol down, lube with premium lube of your choice, and then rack the gun over a period of days for at least 500 reps. Seriously....the slide and barrel need to get the mating areas burnished and the trigger really benefits from Snap Caps and 500+ trigger pulls. I started racking the gun in 20 rep sequences and have done a set of 20 every time I handled the gun the last few days and I can see the top of the barrel and the burnished areas. The springs are only the tip of the iceberg...the gun just needs to break in. Hot ammo will help but that's gonna get expensive if you don't hand load.

This one's a keeper for me and I'm extremely happy with it but I still feel that the pistol is extreme and not for the "typical" person who will buy it - the gun is not for the inexperienced or timid/occasional gun owner. The springs are stiff and always will be. Mags are a bear to load, the slide is hard to rack and the trigger is, to me, a classic DA revolver pull style of trigger. Yes it stacks a little but mine is not gritty. I like the trigger...it's never gonna go *BaNg!* unless you are seriously wanting to pull the trigger. It's no harder for me than my Ruger LCR but it's not cammed and the gun is *TINY*. To be comfortable with the trigger you'll have to train with it. Got big hands? This is not ever gonna be a comfortable gun to shoot with big, thick hands. Got weak hands or a grip compromised by arthritis? It's gonna be uncomfortable if you can ever get comfortable with the Pico. This is not a beginners gun - it's a heavy DA trigger hammer fired hide out pistol built to shoot thousands of rounds of hot SD style ammunition. It's a little tank, it is not a toy.

Pix added 12/7 Sunday.

VooDoo
 
Last edited:
Good to hear! I've been interested in the Pico, too, but anxious to hear if Beretta has the gun "right" out of the box. Sounds promising!
 
Thanks for the report. How does the Pico compare size-wise to the LCP and CW380? How much are extra mags?

Dunno about the LCP or CW380 as I don't own those - shot 'em, didn't care for them. The LCP was my favorite of the two but it kicks significantly more than the Pico with the same ammunition. The LCP is a fine gun but it's recoil is too snappy for me to manage accurately in rapid fire. I have never shot a CW380 that would run and don't own one of those either.

My Wife owns a Glock 42 and I did shoot pix of that for comparison so you might find comparison pix of the LCP and CW380 comparisons to the G42 on The 'Web and get a better idea of the size difference.

StackedComparison_zpsd1ecf9cd.jpg

Pico on top of G42.

RearComparison_zpsbc329cf4.jpg

Rear view of Pico and G42 to show thickness differences.

TopComparisonII_zps71554895.jpg

Top view which really shows the differences - height wise they are really close with the extended mags (both shown with extended mags) but the Pico is a bit thinner and way shorter. I am carrying the Pico in the pocket of my sweat pants with the flush mag and it has literally disappeared. The G42, with the same Home Brew *hot* .380, is significantly milder shooting than the Pico. The Pico is not near as snappy as an LCP...so I find the recoil with hot SD ammunition medium on the Pico. Not bad enough to make in uncontrollable but snappier by quite a ways more than a G42. The Pico is significantly softer shooting than the LCP with the same ammunition.

Beretta had mags for the Pico for $34 with or without extensions. I personally prefer the flush mags with my pinky under the gun as the gun shoots just fine that way...the extended mag does help get a better grab and helps with the Pico trigger. When the extra frames are available for the Pico I'll likely get a white one and add a Talon Grip and carry with the flush mag. I love the modular chassis concept as this will allow after market frames to be marketed with more meat at the rear, bigger trigger guards etc. to be shipped direct thru the mail. Cleaning the modular chassis after a 250 round range session was a 45 second deal. Took the gun down and chassis out and sprayed it with Powershot and then when the solvent flashed off I sprayed it with BreakFree CLP in the can. The rest of the gun is stainless and polymer and was pre oiled liberally with BreakFree. It cleaned up with the wipe of a cloth.

Done! :cool:

While I'm at it I should say something about the sights. This is a tiny gun with big gun sights and it shoots to POA between 15' and 30' just fine. The gun is way more accurate than I can use with my old eyes. For those who are gonna target shoot this gun using sights during familiarization/training you will be surprised and pleased *and* the sights are removable/interchangeable so you can add after market night sights or adjust the rear sights to your hearts content. I'm not a big sight person on small SD guns and use a flash sighting style and then only at 30'+. This gun can make some pretty nice groups but for me it shines in panic style point shooting which is what I normally do and how I train.

VooDoo
 
Last edited:
Nice... I really appreciate the detailed report & pics. I may just have to pick one up (dangit!)...I need another pocket 380 like I need another kid in college...
 
Nice... I really appreciate the detailed report & pics. I may just have to pick one up (dangit!)...I need another pocket 380 like I need another kid in college...

I put my eye on this pistol 2 years ago as I love Beretta ergos and have owned several Beretta's thru the years and like them. A lot! I make no bones or excuses about being a Beretta Fan Boy nor will I apologize for that. I am what I am. :evil:

I *will* reiterate that this gun is extreme. It is a teeny, tiny, tank and it will not be for everyone, everywhere, all the time. It *will* take some breaking in to be reliable, it *will* likely be finicky with some ammunition, and it *will* not be "The Bomb" for everyone, everywhere, all the time, no matter what. You'll have to train with it and the slide is a *BEAR* to rack due to the stiffness of the springs designed to help the gun handle hot SD style ammunition. I have drawn some fire for being a proponent of this gun as several folks have not had good luck with the gun "right out of the box" because they really want the gun to be generic and seamless for everyone out of the box.

It is the smallest .380 out there and a really well built gun. But I'm gonna stick to my impression that it will never be all that and a bag 'O chips for everyone especially if one has big thick hands or compromised hand strength or is an inexperienced shooter looking for their first gun to buy, load, and never train with. These are my opinions and I'll stick to them. If you really want one (and I can't imagine who wouldn't but I know better...) I'd really want to shoot one first. Hopefully more ranges will put them out for rental or they will become more common and folks can try them.

I'll be loaning mine at the range and within my Gun Buddy group liberally so folks can get a taste before they plunk down the cash. Be advised that my *opinion* is that this is an extremely well built and well designed pistol but it will never be perfect for everyone, all the time, with whatever cheezy cheap .380 you can find to test it with for 20 rounds before putting it in your pocket. I love the gun but I'm not gonna tout it for novices, beginners, folks with compromised hand strength or extreme builds in the hands. :cool:

VooDoo
 
Great review and field report. Something to look into (always room in the stable for another .380!).
 
Excellent write up:) Thanks!

I have started packing pocket pistols more and more over big ol' guns. As a huge fan of Beretta, I have been interested in the Pico. I almost bought a Nano, but have come to the conclusion that I am not a big fan of smaller 9s. If I can't carry if easily easily and invisibly in my pants pocket, it needs to go on my belt and and needs to be closer to full size.

I have been enjoying my M&P Bodyguard, and I don't mind the snap of my LCP. The Pico looks like a well built tank. I like that. I shoot my pocket pistols often. I need durability.
 
Voo Doo you are spot on. Both G-42 and lcp 380 lovers are going TO HAVE TO ATLEAST TRY ONE. I cant say much more then you coverd. Out of the box it ate up my 100g. extm. rnfp rounds for the G-42 hot! Accurate as heck up to 7yds. The first stove piped and then it was game on! Welded a new gong and @ 15yds. it was tink tink tink! My 42 is @ rest ,enjoy your PICO as I will mine! Oh one Question for you/and or Barreta wonder if we will see the drop in 32.?
 
Oh one Question for you/and or Barreta wonder if we will see the drop in 32.?

I do love my Glock 42 but it's my Wife's gun. The Pico is mine all mine and I'm having a really fun time with it. Obsession actually....the G42 is an awesome "tool" but the Pico is just plain my kind of gun. I have always loved Beretta Mouse Guns all the way back to the Jetfire's and Bobcats. The Pico is an evolution of that and I think this modular chassis thing is fantastic making cleaning and upgrades to frames a snap. And upgrading spring kits or whatever? Literally a 10 minute change out.

Jeez, I'm stoked for the accessories and the drop in .32 barrel but I have no idea when that might be available. A .32 barrel for this gun would have me drooling all over again as it would share calibers with my Colt Pocket Hammerless collection. And I run me some *hot* .32 ammo in the reloading shop too.... :what:

VooDoo
 
Sounds like it's running well for you. That's the main thing. I'm really itching to get one myself but there's the issue of the danged HK rebate running til the end of December...
 
as a point of information the Seecamp 380 is still the smallest 380 out there. It has the same slide width, unloaded weight with a magazine, and capacity as the Pico, but is 1/4 less in height and just under a full inch shorter. the grip width of the pico is less .75" to Seecamp's .91
 
as a point of information the Seecamp 380 is still the smallest 380 out there

And you thought the Pico was hard to get your hands on, I can count on my fingers of one hand the number of Seecamp 380 pistols I've actually seen offered for sale since it was announced many years ago. And the price, oy!
 
I've seen many Kahr P380s for sale and they are a hair smaller than the Pico.
 
Thanks!

Great work up Voo Doo.
Sir , do you think this could replace the Tomcat in the Beretta line up?
 
Whalley Precision in Massachusetts has bought Seecamp and will very soon be ramping up production on 380's and 32's. they are also planning on bringing back the 25 acp seecamp.
 
thank you Vodoun for this review of the pico. very informative. it was your review of the Glock 42 that helped me to decide to finally buy one and i am very happy with it.
 
Sir , do you think this could replace the Tomcat in the Beretta line up?

I have heard that rumor as well but have no idea if it's true or not. Personally I really like the Tomcat but I think this modular approach that Beretta is using is "The Bomb" and enables/will enable Beretta and after market folks to customize this and other pistols that follow it virtually at will.

If they offer the Pico in .32 as they said before it was released my personal opinion is that it could replace the Tomcat and offer a great deal of versatility and customization for larger hands/smaller hands *and* give folks stuff like lasers, night sights, etc with a mail order frame assembly. If the Pico works out for Beretta, I think this could really "Change the Game" and we'll see others offering modular/serialized chassis concept pistols.

But this is conjecture on my part. I think there is a lot of desire for that .32 option and I hope that the .32 barrel and color, laser, light options in Pico frames become available soon.

VooDoo
 
I *will* reiterate that this gun is extreme. It is a teeny, tiny, tank and it will not be for everyone, everywhere, all the time. It *will* take some breaking in to be reliable, it *will* likely be finicky with some ammunition, and it *will* not be "The Bomb" for everyone, everywhere, all the time, no matter what. You'll have to train with it and the slide is a *BEAR* to rack due to the stiffness of the springs designed to help the gun handle hot SD style ammunition. I have drawn some fire for being a proponent of this gun as several folks have not had good luck with the gun "right out of the box" because they really want the gun to be generic and seamless for everyone out of the box

I have heard that rumor as well but have no idea if it's true or not. Personally I really like the Tomcat but I think this modular approach that Beretta is using is "The Bomb" and enables/will enable Beretta and after market folks to customize this and other pistols that follow it virtually at will.

If they offer the Pico in .32 as they said before it was released my personal opinion is that it could replace the Tomcat and offer a great deal of versatility and customization for larger hands/smaller hands *and* give folks stuff like lasers, night sights, etc with a mail order frame assembly. If the Pico works out for Beretta, I think this could really "Change the Game" and we'll see others offering modular/serialized chassis concept pistols.

But this is conjecture on my part. I think there is a lot of desire for that .32 option and I hope that the .32 barrel and color, laser, light options in Pico frames become available soon.

VooDoo
Given your remarks on the Pico, it would be a mistake for it to replace the Tomcat, as none of those attributes apply to it. I really liked the Tomcat I had, but mine was an early one (they were prone to frame cracking) so I sold it. But I think Beretta has discontinued the Tomcat again, so who knows?
 
I'm of the feeling that certain types of manufacturing processes are going to become too expensive over the long haul and in the near future. I think (conjecture) that the Tomcat as it sits today, will soon (if it is not already) be too expensive to produce for the number of folks who might by it.

Polymer and modularity will replace machined metal wherever possible. Overall I'm pretty impressed with the Pico (and the G42, and the LCP) and I'm gonna be very curious to see where this "concept" of serialized chassis and modularity goes over the next 5 years.

I'm not into predictions in the 21st century 'cause stuff changes so fast but I'd be surprised if this concept isn't expanded into a dominant firearms form within 5 years or so. By Beretta and others. That this would replace the Tomcat would not surprise me either.

VooDoo
 
Thanks for the report! I'm excited that this is finally out; not many firearms this size have good sights, and I'm a small guy with small hands, so the large-hands complaints that some people have don't apply to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top