...and for all of you that keep insisting that it's because of the rotating barrel that the px4 is a soft shooter or that the rotating barrel soaks up recoil,here is my own theory on that:
it's post #24
http://www.waltherforums.com/forum/free-range-time/16489-picked-up-beretta-9-today-3.html(despite what beretta themselves claim)
..and to add: the polymer frame and the polymer surrounded "tub" should help with recoil beyond how the cougar feels,but only just a hair.
i am one of those that thinks the px4 is a "soft" shooter,but i also think people are exaggerating. i mean,it's not like your shooting a .22lr with a gun that weighs 40 oz..(or even close to that)
i'm waiting on the inox version. my plan for it is to replace what i currently use for HD and/or night stand. i just like it's recoil impulse(for the middle of the night when i'm half asleep),it's still relatively light and appreciate how beretta makes it easy to get or make 20rd mags and their D-spring that is a factory/stock part and not an after-market part,so it has no "trigger job" done to it.
..not for carry though. it can't come close or even "touch" the p99 AS for that.(on many levels,including but not limited to the p99 AS stock trigger,even when compared after adding the D-spring to the px4)(for me
)
i think the px4 is awesome and beretta has a great product here but it has been real slow for people to realize this with other brands so firmly established. there's alot of quality built into it too. i chuckle a little every time someone says that the rotating barrel may be unreliable or that it needs an excessive amount of lube for it to be reliable. apparently these people are not aware of the fine details of this particular beretta rotating barrel system that actually contributes to reliability,especially compared with other rotating barreled guns that have come in the past or others that are being produced today.(there's a difference and it's all in the details,..lots of details)