Bersa Thunder 9 High Capacity Range Report

Status
Not open for further replies.

bodoke

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
11
Location
Argentina
Hi everyone,

I live in Argentina and I know that the Bersa Thunder 9 and Thunder 40 High Capacity (17 and 13 rounds) are now available (or soon will be) in the United

States so I thought to put in this forum a range report on the thunder 9 for you all. I hope it will be usefull to you and I apologize in advance for my

english, I know it's not perfect so if you don't understand something please let me know.

I have had the Bersa Thunder 9 for the last two months and have put 300 rounds thru it, ten different type of factory ammo and seven different brands. One

reload and one hand made load with new brass.

Characteristics:

Caliber: 9 x 19 mm (parabellum)
Operation: Semiautomatic
Magazine capacity: 17 cartridges
Rear sight: Dovetailed (white outline, a la Glock)
Front sight: In the slide (White dot)
Safeties: Hammer and Firing ping
Grips: Polymer grooved and no finger grooves


Dimensions:

Overall length: 192 mm / 7.5 in.
Height: 140 mm / 5.5 in.
Width: 37 mm / 1.5 in.
Barrel length: 110 mm / 4 in.
Weight: 870 gr. / 30 oz.


Frame:

AA7075 Alloy, (Zinc, Magnesium, Manganese, Copper and Titanium) Spanish origin - Machined here.


Slide and Barrel:

41L40 Steel, Italian origin - Machined here.
The slide, barrel and frame are Tennifer coated (in the blue version, wich I have). It's the same coating that Glock, Walther and others uses on their

pistols so the libricant needed is minimum.


The trigger is pretty good, the DA trigger is average heavy but you can keep the sights aligned while pulling it. The SA trigger is very smooth light and

crisp. Very SIG like.


Ergonomics: (Please keep in mind that I have wide hands but short fingers...)
The safety and slide release levers are fully ambidextrous and easy to operate, engaging the safety also decocks the hammer so no condition 1 carry. It has a

reversible magazine release button wich I changed to the right side of the grip and operate with my index finger (Remember the short fingers?) Anyway it's

easier and faster for me than using the thumb even if it were at my reach.
The handling is quite good for me, everything is on the right place and it's very comfortable to me.

On the not so good side there are two thing that I don't like, first, it's difficult to find aftermarket grips because of the weird way it's secured to the frame, with a screw at the rear bottom of the grip. The same happens to the rear sight because it covers the firing pin. Anyway I think they are minor trade offs.

The two most important things to me are reliability and accuracy, I don't accept any pistol wich has FTF or FTE nor can't group reasonable well, this is why I tested all this ammo, even, if I use the IMI Samson FMJ 158 gr for SD. It's illegal to use any other ammo than FMJ for SD in this country.


THE TEST:

Ammo tested:

Factory
FEDERAL Hydra-Shock JHP 147 gr.
FIOCCHI Truncated Cone Teflon Coated 123 gr.
HORNADY JHP-XTP 115 gr.
IMI Samson FMJ 158 gr.
MAGTECH FMJ 124 gr.
MAGTECH FMJ Flat Nose Subsonic 147 gr.
MAGTECH JHP +P+ 115 gr.
MAGTECH First Defense Solid Copper HP 92.6 gr.
WINCHESTER FMJ Truncated Cone Subsonic 147 gr.
WOLF FMJ Steel Case 115 gr.

Reload:
Stopping Power FMJ 124 gr.

Hand made with new brass:
3G FMJ 124 gr.


This pistol is designed to handle +P+ loads so I tried them with no problem at all. No FTF or FTE at all, everything worked flawlessly, I also filled a magazine with the twelve different type of ammo I had, so far so good. All the shooting was done at 7 meters with the best grouping at 2 inches wich for me, at this point is quite acceptable.

Well, I have nothing else to say, I hope this would be usefull to you and I will update this report with more ammo and some pictures.
I'll keep you updated.

Happy shooting!!!
Max.
 
Thanks for the report! I've handled one of these recently and came away impressed. If they all come away like the one you've got, it seems like it might be a pretty decent gun for the price ($329 in central Ohio).
 
uuuhhhhhhh....that alloy doesnt sound so great, any info about durability, or strength? i know it says titanium is in it, but how much? most of the other metals sound......unsutiable for such use, not to be over critical, but ive been thinking about one of these.
 
Well,

maybe I missed something but from 2005 the Federal Polide Department, the Province of Buenos Aires Police Department and the equivalent of US SWAT team are replacing de FN HP with the Bersa Thunder 9 and, as far as I know, they must pass a pretty hard test. One of my instructors has one T9 with over 17.000 rounds with no replaced parts and it's still working fine.

Max.
 
Great report - thank you! I'm a huge fan of my Bersa 380, and if my Ruger P95 ever needs replacing I certainly would consider the Bersa 9mm.


And your English is outstanding; at least by my standards. :)
 
Thanks for the report. I love my Bersa .380, a 17 round 9mm Bersa sounds good. I'm looking forward to seeing some pictures!
 
I handled a Thunder 9 at the store the other day. It seems to borrow a great deal from the Walther P88. Fits the hand well, holds lots of rounds, and seems decently put together. It's a pretty sizeable gun, though...a lot like a Beretta 92 in size, if not as long.

One correction: Tenifer is not a coating, but a surface treatment for steel, essentially chemical case-hardening. The coating on a Glock slide is on top of the Tenifer-treated steel.
 
Thank you Marko,

your are right, tenifer is a surface hardening process, sorry for the mistake. Please if you see other mistakes, let me know so I can make the corrections.

Max.
 
bersa_thunder40_HC_large2.gif

Shoot well.........
 
Where did you get all those specifications? I have a Thunder 45 Ultra Compact, the owners manual says nothing about what its made of, etc. I do know one thing, I really like this gun, it has functioned 100 percent and is pretty accurate.
 
Well,

I did some research and I also talked to bersa, I forgot to mention that the Bersas T9, T40 and the Minis T9, T40 and T45 are based on the Walther P88 and, BTW all of these are made with the same alloy.

Max.
 
"AA7075 Alloy, (Zinc, Magnesium, Manganese, Copper and Titanium) Spanish origin - Machined here."

I believe this refers to 7075 aluminum, a high strength, heat treatable alloy often used in aerospace applications. The zinc, magnesium, etc. are actually the alloying elements. This is definately not the low melting point zinc that Raven frames are cast from.

The fact that the Bersa frame is made from this alloy bodes very well for the gun's strength and durability.
 
Shear_stress,

you are right, it's the used in the aerospace industry. I suppose it's part of the reasons the bersas can handle the +P+ loads and, for example, the manual of the Wintness/Tanfoglio says NOT to use +P loads even for the models that are all steel. Sorry for not being more specific before.

Max
 
No problem. We use a lot of 7075 aluminum at work when we want our parts to be really hard and durable. It is a great alloy.

The word "zinc" sets off alarm bells for folks. It is the metal of choice for cheaply made pistols. As a result, there are actually states in the U.S. that have "melting point" laws specifically to ban cast-zinc "saturday night specials".

Fortunately, quality guns like the Bersa are made of good materials. I have a Bersa 23 in 22LR, and I love it!
 
Thats really good to know that all the Thunders are made of the same stuff. Heres a little info about 7075 aluminum:
7075 Aluminum

And some about the 4140 steel:
4140 Steel

After reading these and talking to my dad who is a machinist of nearly 50 years, it sounds like the Bersas are made of high grade materials. I think that those people who say the Bersa is a cheap gun are only saying that because it doesn't cost a fortune. I'd rather have a 350 dollar Bersa thats well made and functions great than a much more expensive pistol like a Walther P88 (which is a great gun) that most likely will not work any better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top