Best 40 S&W bullet for hunting

Status
Not open for further replies.
According to Hornady's ballistics chart, in .40 cal, their 180 gr XTP has the thickest jacket and is designed to be driven to the highest velocity of any, with terminal performance maxin' out @ 1450fps. This would be the best XTP for a carbine intended for hunting and should still work well outta a handgun.
 
never mind just looked up the load data on the Barnes web site I will wait and find the brand bullets I want to use instead of over priced and lower speed bullets. If all else fails I still have some factory rounds.

OK then.Never mind

As mentioned velocity is not the only factor in hunting bullets.

Seems to me Barnes is one of the more expensive brands. I offered some 180 JHP Remington
You are the one hunting deer with a 40SW. Hope the Deer dies quickly.
 
OK then.Never mind

As mentioned velocity is not the only factor in hunting bullets.

Seems to me Barnes is one of the more expensive brands. I offered some 180 JHP Remington
You are the one hunting deer with a 40SW. Hope the Deer dies quickly.
I meant never mind on the Barnes TAC-XP bullets they can't handle the speed increase that would come from firing in a carbine from what I read. I have nothing against Remington bullets. I used Remington bullets in my 30-30 for years, wish I still had my 30-30, and I might still try to work something out with you. I am just getting frustrated on finding bullets that I know how they react out of my pistol. I don't know how any of these are going to act using longshot powder till I test them. I don't know how that any round is going to act out of a carbine since I am still looking for one. I know velocity is not the only thing involved in a hunting round. But I also know more velocity equals more energy. Is the 40 the best round for hunting? No. Will it work? Yes. I have seen a 800 lbs hog dropped with a 40 pistol. And seen many, many photos of deer taken with a 40. Do I have access to other pistols that I could use? Yes But none of which I am used to shooting or as accurate as I am with my 40. I am on a fixed income and having deer meat in the freezer saves me money on meat during the year. I can not afford to miss another hunting season because of my arm. Would I prefer to use a rifle round? Yes I have a 7.62x54r M44 I am dying to try out on deer, but can't till my arm heals which will be 6 months+. This is why I am looking for a 40 carbine. I know I can hold it up with one hand, I can use the door of the horse trailer as a prop and without doing more damage to my arm I can steady the gun with my right.
 
FWIW you can mess around with this "energy calculator"

Plug in the book values for velocity of the different with bullets. You will get the energy calculation as you mention plus the "Taylor KO" Factor
(how accurate or reliable that is I can not say.

Kinda the small bullet going fast or the heavy bullet going slow.

A 45ACP or 45 Colt is real slow but has great short range "KO" powder.

http://www.handloads.com/calc/quick.asp
 
FWIW you can mess around with this "energy calculator"

Plug in the book values for velocity of the different with bullets. You will get the energy calculation as you mention plus the "Taylor KO" Factor
(how accurate or reliable that is I can not say.

Kinda the small bullet going fast or the heavy bullet going slow.

A 45ACP or 45 Colt is real slow but has great short range "KO" powder.

http://www.handloads.com/calc/quick.asp
Thanks I will check it out. I am sorry that I came across as I did. Been in allot of pain, lack of sleep, and a screaming 11 month old that wants her Uncle Joey to hold her and I can't because of my arm plus not finding what I am looking for takes a toll on someone after awhile. My chronograph, tumbler, and digital scale is supposed to be here Friday and my nephew said he would come back over to give me an extra set of hands to do some testing of different factory rounds that he will bring with him in ballistic gel.
 
Since you haven't bought the .40 carbine yet, why not get a .357 lever gun? You don't know if you will be accurate with your new carbine. At this point your gonna find better choices in bullets and powders to push them. Plus there will be a lot more casters on this forum that cast .357 and are more able to help you out.


If you really need to stick with .40 look really hard for a hard cast bullet in the 180 range. Hard cast if it hits a bone will be more likely to break that bone.
 
Thanks I will check it out. I am sorry that I came across as I did. Been in allot of pain, lack of sleep, and a screaming 11 month old that wants her Uncle Joey to hold her and I can't because of my arm plus not finding what I am looking for takes a toll on someone after awhile..

Not a problem, did not take it that way.Hard to type the way we feel sometimes.

Been there done that still have a lot of back pain but the kids are grown:D

Things work out if you want them to:)

Hope the arm gets better:)
 
Since you haven't bought the .40 carbine yet, why not get a .357 lever gun? You don't know if you will be accurate with your new carbine. At this point your gonna find better choices in bullets and powders to push them. Plus there will be a lot more casters on this forum that cast .357 and are more able to help you out.


If you really need to stick with .40 look really hard for a hard cast bullet in the 180 range. Hard cast if it hits a bone will be more likely to break that bone.
I will not be able to work the lever till my arm heals so I need to stick to a semi auto that has a pistol grip. I found some hard cast bullets for $10 for a 100 that I might try out. The site said they could go up to 1600 fps without gas checks. I still have to load the 40 even if I don't use it for hunting this year. Might end up using the 1911 45 cal. I have some 230 grain JHP that is supposed to be going out of a 4 inch barrel at 1007 fps and the 1911 has 6 inch barrel. I'll chronograph them this weekend if the chronograph get here on time.

Planning on ordering the 155, 180, and 200 grain 15 BN hard cast bullets for testing and CCW Class but can't find any data for cast and longshot powder. Did see that Accurate #7 was exactly 0.6 grains under both the starting and max loads from the XTP bullets with the same powder. Would it be the same with LS? If someone can point me to the data for longshot with these cast bullets, It would be highly appreciated. Maybe by the time I go through the cast bullets someone will have some XTP' s Noslers, HST' s or another good hollow point round that preforms well.
 
Last edited:
Don't make assumptions based on how one powder reacts from jacketed to lead and try to transfer over to another powder. It could be a good way to blow a gun.

Sounds to me like longshot is not the powder you need to concentrate on.
 
Don't make assumptions based on how one powder reacts from jacketed to lead and try to transfer over to another powder. It could be a good way to blow a gun.

Sounds to me like longshot is not the powder you need to concentrate on.
That's why I was asking. Longshot is the only pistol powder I have right now. I was planning on loading up Hornady XTP bullets which there is data for with the LS but can't find any. The xtp bullets are rated for 800 to 1800 fps. Which would be perfect in my pistol or a carbine. Trying to find a Ruger PC4 if I can find one cheap. That way I can use the same mags in either weapon. I do like the pistol grips on some of the carbines better though.
 
Well I can't give you any specific "40" info, but I have used my 10mm quite a bit in the woods.

Mine is the Javalena with the 7" barrel so I get a bit more from my loads than the shorter barrels. My mainstay load runs 1350fps with the 180gr bullets. I have used just about all of the major brand names bullets on hogs and have narrowed down the better ones to the Winchester 180gr JHP, and the Gold Dot. I know that everyone has this that or the other which they feel is best for one or more reasons, but like I said these two have performed the best for me.

While I admit that a hog isn't a deer, they are a good test as to what a load will do. We have shot enough of them that when our load will readily drop them deer are pretty much an non issue if you put the shot where it should go. These three were taken between 20, and 30yds using the 180gr GD, as you can see they penetrated just fine and exited with a broadside shot,

attachment.php


attachment.php


I know the little one in the middle isn't much to brag about, but they are MUCH harder to hit on the run when they are that size, especially in the head. The point is that the 180's work very well in this caliber for hunting. If you used a cast instead you would probably get similar results with a round flat nosed that will feed.

As for the Remington's that were offered, they would probably work equally as well. I simply cannot say as I do not remember shooting them in this particular weight. Not that I haven't, just that when I did most of my testing it was the first couple of years I had the pistol. Once I found a load(s) that did what I needed I pretty much stuck to it. I loaded for both accuracy and performance, and the Win's and the GD both shoot around 2" out to 50yds on most days and some days less. I'm the weak link there not the loads.

One other thing you might also look into is someone who might have a little AA-7 or 9 in your area that you might eb able to trade out for some of. These both work great in the 10, with the 180gr weight bullets, and should but to a lesser degree with the 40.

Hope this helps and wishing you the best on your hunt.
 

Attachments

  • PB200029.jpg
    PB200029.jpg
    129.2 KB · Views: 66
  • PB200030.jpg
    PB200030.jpg
    155 KB · Views: 231
Well I can't give you any specific "40" info, but I have used my 10mm quite a bit in the woods.

Mine is the Javalena with the 7" barrel so I get a bit more from my loads than the shorter barrels. My mainstay load runs 1350fps with the 180gr bullets. I have used just about all of the major brand names bullets on hogs and have narrowed down the better ones to the Winchester 180gr JHP, and the Gold Dot. I know that everyone has this that or the other which they feel is best for one or more reasons, but like I said these two have performed the best for me.

While I admit that a hog isn't a deer, they are a good test as to what a load will do. We have shot enough of them that when our load will readily drop them deer are pretty much an non issue if you put the shot where it should go. These three were taken between 20, and 30yds using the 180gr GD, as you can see they penetrated just fine and exited with a broadside shot,

attachment.php


attachment.php


I know the little one in the middle isn't much to brag about, but they are MUCH harder to hit on the run when they are that size, especially in the head. The point is that the 180's work very well in this caliber for hunting. If you used a cast instead you would probably get similar results with a round flat nosed that will feed.

As for the Remington's that were offered, they would probably work equally as well. I simply cannot say as I do not remember shooting them in this particular weight. Not that I haven't, just that when I did most of my testing it was the first couple of years I had the pistol. Once I found a load(s) that did what I needed I pretty much stuck to it. I loaded for both accuracy and performance, and the Win's and the GD both shoot around 2" out to 50yds on most days and some days less. I'm the weak link there not the loads.

One other thing you might also look into is someone who might have a little AA-7 or 9 in your area that you might eb able to trade out for some of. These both work great in the 10, with the 180gr weight bullets, and should but to a lesser degree with the 40.

Hope this helps and wishing you the best on your hunt.
Thanks, I will probably have to get another pound of powder for just cast bullets different from LS. Going to call Hodgdon here in a few to get their input on cast and LS first. I read somewhere that the federal hst, the speer gold dot, and the Winchester ranger all use the same bullet. If this is true it would explain why they looked pretty much the same in the test that I watched. Shot through four layers of denim, and 24 inches of wet pack and water jug combo, they penetrated 15 1/2 inches and expanded to right at 3/4 of an inch in size and retained almost all of its weight. Would like for someone to explain something to me though. While looking at the cast data for the 200 grain cast bullet I noticed that even though the max load is 0.6 grains under the 200 grain XTP bullet the cast has a 33 fps increase over the XTP at a lower pressure. How is this possible when fired from the same test gun? Is it because the cast is getting a better seal or has less friction than the jacketed xtp bullet? Oh accurate #7 data was what I was looking at.
 
Thanks, I will probably have to get another pound of powder for just cast bullets different from LS.
I have found HS-6 to be extremely accurate when loading cast bullets and it's close to Longshot in relative burn rate. I'm sure it will work very well in the 40 S&W with cast bullets and deliver the velocity and accuracy you're looking for. SR4756 isn't a bad choice either if you can find some. It's too bad HS-7 is no longer available because it's just as slow as Longshot and will deliver superior performance with both jacketed and cast bullets. HS-7(W571) was the hands-down best powder for loading the 10mm/40 S&W.
 
I have found HS-6 to be extremely accurate when loading cast bullets and it's close to Longshot in relative burn rate. I'm sure it will work very well in the 40 S&W with cast bullets and deliver the velocity and accuracy you're looking for. SR4756 isn't a bad choice either if you can find some. It's too bad HS-7 is no longer available because it's just as slow as Longshot and will deliver superior performance with both jacketed and cast bullets. HS-7(W571) was the hands-down best powder for loading the 10mm/40 S&W.
Arch, where do you find the load data for HS6 for cast. My Lyman 49 is about useless since it only has cast data for 150 and 175 grain of their alloys. I'll need data for 155,180, & 200 grain hard cast. Lee has 6 different powder loads for the 155 & 180, and one load for the 200 . None of which are the same powder for all three and none are for HS6. The Accur#7 is the closest to all three with it being listed with both the 155 & 200 but not the 180 for some reason. Still don't know what BB stands for on the cast bullet. Example: 180 grain FP BB The cast bullets are made by Going Ballistic Bullets. At $10 for a 100 for each I can afford to do a little testing with cast. If nothing else I can work up a good load just for accuracy for use in CCW class and target practice.
 
Arch, where do you find the load data for HS6 for cast. My Lyman 49 is about useless since it only has cast data for 150 and 175 grain of their alloys. I'll need data for 155,180, & 200 grain hard cast. Lee has 6 different powder loads for the 155 & 180, and one load for the 200 . None of which are the same powder for all three and none are for HS6. The Accur#7 is the closest to all three with it being listed with both the 155 & 200 but not the 180 for some reason. Still don't know what BB stands for on the cast bullet. Example: 180 grain FP BB The cast bullets are made by Going Ballistic Bullets. At $10 for a 100 for each I can afford to do a little testing with cast. If nothing else I can work up a good load just for accuracy for use in CCW class and target practice.
Lyman's Cast Handbook 4th Edition has extensive load data for everything including the 40 S&W. The data includes HS-6 for bullets weighing 145gr up to 200gr with 4 more bullets in between.

That manual is a year newer than the 49th Edition of their load manual and for the first time ever includes load data for molds other than those made by Lyman which are not included in the 49th Edition. Also, it's Blue instead of Orange which is reason enough to buy it! LOL If you're going to load lead bullets, IMO that manual is a must.

I don't usually post load data from manuals because mistakes happen too often when writing. If by the time you get the cast bullets you can't pick up a copy shoot me a PM and I'll help you out.
 
Would like for someone to explain something to me though. While looking at the cast data for the 200 grain cast bullet I noticed that even though the max load is 0.6 grains under the 200 grain XTP bullet the cast has a 33 fps increase over the XTP at a lower pressure. How is this possible when fired from the same test gun? Is it because the cast is getting a better seal or has less friction than the jacketed xtp bullet? Oh accurate #7 data was what I was looking at.

You will probably find that most bullets have lower pressure with equal loads when compared to the XTP. Simply due to them having a thicker or harder jacket on them.

That said, yes the cast bullets do have less friction than jacketed which is why you can usually get equal to or more velocity for the same given load. The trick however is the pressure and the alloy have to be matched up or you stand a chance of picking up some leading. Some isn't a deal breaker, as long as accuracy and the amount being found remains somewhat at a constant. If you only seeing some streaks down the barrel, but it stays about the same after 30 or more rounds and your accuracy is still good I wouldn't worry about it. However if you find after 10 rounds or less it is still building up, your pressure is going to increase and your accuracy is going out the window. This is when you dump the load and try another powder or different bullet alloy or hardness.

You can have a soft bullet that fits great shoot better than a hard bullet that doesn't fit so great, and vie versa. Also it can be as simple as a lube issue. This will usually show as leading towards the muzzle, where fit or pressure issues show more on the chamber end.

Hope this helps.
 
Lyman's Cast Handbook 4th Edition has extensive load data for everything including the 40 S&W. The data includes HS-6 for bullets weighing 145gr up to 200gr with 4 more bullets in between.

That manual is a year newer than the 49th Edition of their load manual and for the first time ever includes load data for molds other than those made by Lyman which are not included in the 49th Edition. Also, it's Blue instead of Orange which is reason enough to buy it! LOL If you're going to load lead bullets, IMO that manual is a must.

I don't usually post load data from manuals because mistakes happen too often when writing. If by the time you get the cast bullets you can't pick up a copy shoot me a PM and I'll help you out.
Thanks Arch, I'll see if I can find one before I run out of money for the month. Just found out my chronograph is backorder so no telling when I will get it and I want to have it before loading up these 40's. Till then I'll keep looking for good hollow points in stock and just run the cases through the tumbler and get the cases deprimed, sized and inspected so I can load them up when the chronograph comes in.
 
You will probably find that most bullets have lower pressure with equal loads when compared to the XTP. Simply due to them having a thicker or harder jacket on them.

That said, yes the cast bullets do have less friction than jacketed which is why you can usually get equal to or more velocity for the same given load. The trick however is the pressure and the alloy have to be matched up or you stand a chance of picking up some leading. Some isn't a deal breaker, as long as accuracy and the amount being found remains somewhat at a constant. If you only seeing some streaks down the barrel, but it stays about the same after 30 or more rounds and your accuracy is still good I wouldn't worry about it. However if you find after 10 rounds or less it is still building up, your pressure is going to increase and your accuracy is going out the window. This is when you dump the load and try another powder or different bullet alloy or hardness.

You can have a soft bullet that fits great shoot better than a hard bullet that doesn't fit so great, and vie versa. Also it can be as simple as a lube issue. This will usually show as leading towards the muzzle, where fit or pressure issues show more on the chamber end.

Hope this helps.
Thank for the follow-up comment. Looks more and more that I am going to want a mentor when I first load these up. There is nothing like having someone there in person to teach you these things. The books just don't cover all the question that experience will. Thank again.
 
Slight threadjack:

Thanks for the hunting experience/information, 41 Mag. I take it your view is that the 180 Speer GD holds up well to the 1300fps velocities you're running?
 
Slight threadjack:

Thanks for the hunting experience/information, 41 Mag. I take it your view is that the 180 Speer GD holds up well to the 1300fps velocities you're running?
Saw some test with some 10 mm Underwood factory ammo that was choreographed at 1443 fps from a 155 grain gold dot bullet fired from a Gen 4 G20. It had 1500 fps marked on the box. I think I read that the gold dot was good from 800 - 1650 fps but they also make a bullet called Deepcurl made for hunting but I didn't see it in the 10/40 calibers.
 
A LOT of "supposition" here regarding the Ruger Carbine; not any experience.

I HAVE had some experience with it....

You won't get any higher velocities with the Carbine and the .40S&W cartridge. The velocities might in fact be LOWER than from a 5"bbl. This is simply due to the bore/case capacity ratio, called Expansion Ratio.

A close friend had one of the Carbines when they first came out and he used it to hunt with, and I provided him with some handloads that worked very well on deer.

Back in the mid 1990's when we did this, the "popular knowledge" was that the 180-200gr bullets would be better for shooting deer. NOT in my experience.

I found that of the factory ammo available that the 155gr Winchester Silver-Tip JHP's gave the highest m/v; One lot# gave in excess of the advertised 1,205fps by 30fsp from my 4-5/8" Glock M22. Anther was about that much slower... But close...

After getting essentially non-expansion type performance from the 180gr SXT (black talon w/o lubalox coating), and similar non-expasion performace from the 180gr XTP and Winchester and Remington 180gr HP's, we (HE) switched first to the 155gr ST's, and then the 135gr Noslers, and 155gr Remington and Winchester JHP's.
These essentially performed like a 150-170gr bullet from a .30/30. Typically complete penetration on broadside shots; mushroomed bullets under hide on raking or spine shots. However, shots had to be kept CLOSE ! Under 75yds preferably.

In my experience the cast bullets (I first used the Lyman .401 SWC for the Herters .401 PowerMag in my 10mm S&W 1006, later it and the Lee 175gr TC in the .40S&W); work about as well as the 180gr JHP's.....

Something about the hair and hide of deer prevented us from seeing the expansion advertised for the Talons and heavier XTP's. The cast bullets just cut a .40" hole through and through. Never recovered one to see if they expanded any.... About like using a conical bullet from a .38/40 l/a carbine....

At the time, I was using 800X with the 180's and Universal or WSF with the 155's. Now when I load for the .40S&W; its with LongShot.

After killing a number of deer with the Glock M22, I started carrying the 155gr Winchester SilverTips. These came the closest to duplicating the performace of the .357mag w/145gr SilverTips.

After switching to the lighter bullets, the only "problem" we found with the Ruger Carbine for hunting deer was that the trajectory made it a ~100yd gun, at best... That and accuracy wasn't anything to get excited about.
 
Kuyong_Chuin said:
On the cast bullets, do I need to buy a new lube or can I use my black powder lube?

Unless you're casting your own homemade bullets you don't need lube, when you buy them from online they're already lubed up for you.

I've loaded a lot of .40, and LongShot works well for the most part. If you're using hardcast bullets, I would drop about .5 gr compared to jacketed load data and work up from there. I've found through loading a bunch of Longshot that it can be very consistent, or fairly inconsistent too, it just depends on the charge. I've used it in my Glocks and with 180gr can get over 1150 from a 4" and over 1300 fps from a 6".

I don't think Longshot is a good choice for 200gr though, in the .40 anyways. It does fine with 180's but the 200's just take up room and the charge weight is so low that you can't get up good velocity with it. Other powders like 800x and a few others do well with 200gr bullets, but Longshot lags using the 200gr bullets in the .40. It does work well from 135-180gr though.

Also, if you have any you can just use factory .40 JHP ammo and that should work well enough. I'm not sure whether you're reloading because you don't have any factory ammo, or if you're reloading just because. I mention this because if you're having a hard time locating reloading components then factory ammo will work. Factory ammo, from 135-180gr will drop a deer like a sack of spuds.
 
A LOT of "supposition" here regarding the Ruger Carbine; not any experience.

I HAVE had some experience with it....

You won't get any higher velocities with the Carbine and the .40S&W cartridge. The velocities might in fact be LOWER than from a 5"bbl. This is simply due to the bore/case capacity ratio, called Expansion Ratio.

A close friend had one of the Carbines when they first came out and he used it to hunt with, and I provided him with some handloads that worked very well on deer.

Back in the mid 1990's when we did this, the "popular knowledge" was that the 180-200gr bullets would be better for shooting deer. NOT in my experience.

I found that of the factory ammo available that the 155gr Winchester Silver-Tip JHP's gave the highest m/v; One lot# gave in excess of the advertised 1,205fps by 30fsp from my 4-5/8" Glock M22. Anther was about that much slower... But close...

After getting essentially non-expansion type performance from the 180gr SXT (black talon w/o lubalox coating), and similar non-expasion performace from the 180gr XTP and Winchester and Remington 180gr HP's, we (HE) switched first to the 155gr ST's, and then the 135gr Noslers, and 155gr Remington and Winchester JHP's.
These essentially performed like a 150-170gr bullet from a .30/30. Typically complete penetration on broadside shots; mushroomed bullets under hide on raking or spine shots. However, shots had to be kept CLOSE ! Under 75yds preferably.

In my experience the cast bullets (I first used the Lyman .401 SWC for the Herters .401 PowerMag in my 10mm S&W 1006, later it and the Lee 175gr TC in the .40S&W); work about as well as the 180gr JHP's.....

Something about the hair and hide of deer prevented us from seeing the expansion advertised for the Talons and heavier XTP's. The cast bullets just cut a .40" hole through and through. Never recovered one to see if they expanded any.... About like using a conical bullet from a .38/40 l/a carbine....

At the time, I was using 800X with the 180's and Universal or WSF with the 155's. Now when I load for the .40S&W; its with LongShot.

After killing a number of deer with the Glock M22, I started carrying the 155gr Winchester SilverTips. These came the closest to duplicating the performace of the .357mag w/145gr SilverTips.

After switching to the lighter bullets, the only "problem" we found with the Ruger Carbine for hunting deer was that the trajectory made it a ~100yd gun, at best... That and accuracy wasn't anything to get excited about.
Thanks for the information. Having problems finding a carbine other that a 9 atm anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top