H&k 2000 Is Very Very Good
FIREPOWER,
I rate the H&K 2000 as near perfect. We use the LEM trigger double action only model.
My agency used the 155 grain JHP ammo in .40 S&W. This is a hot round with a lot of recoil. In the H&K it does not seem much worse than a 9m.m. +P in my GLOCK.
I have had only one misfeed which I blame on a bad mag that I was issued. Aside from that, 100% reliable for the past 2 years.
My qualification scores are the same as when I carried the BERETTA 96D, so accuracy is more than acceptable. I have not tried any really long range shots with the H&K, to see if it could equal the BERETTA at 50 and 100 yards.
The pluses for the H&K are that it is the perfect size all in one gun. This standard was set by the GLOCK 19. The 7 inch long by 5 inch high compact service gun size is large enough for most officers to get a good grip, but small enough to conceal off duty. The polymer frame makes it light, but durable.
One officer recently turned in a gun that was covered in dust from lack of routine care and it still works.
BEST OF ALL, THE RECOIL BUFFER SEEMS TO WORK AS ADVERTISED. IT IS NO MORE TIRING TO SHOOT THAN A GLOCK 19. I sold my GLOCK 22 because of the recoil and it was a larger gun.
The negatives are the HIGH COST and the less than easy field stripping. While it should be easier than a GLOCK or 1911, getting it apart has not proven that easy. High marks to BERETTA and SIG on this.
I have not fired the H&K 3000 (now the model 30), so I cannot compare it.
My agency has started using the 135 grain JHP recently. I am not sure if it is because of a perception that it is more effective or simply to cut recoil a bit. We still have many officers carrying the GLOCK 17 and there is a feeling that many of these officers might not be able to qualify on the H&K 2000 if we use the 155 grain ammo.
Jim