I am debating which pocket gun to go with. I have narrowed down some choices. I would like to have a pocket revolver, because of reliability and I Like the fact you can use .357 rounds in the S&W 640 and SP101. I suppose many say the downsie of the SP101 and S&W 640 is the weight. I want to get the type of pocket size revolvers that do not have hammer, like both SP101 and S&W 640 have hamerless varieties. This is a tough choice. I suppose some say the Kahr 9mm is the all around best pocket carry because it is very light and small and can hold powerful 9mm +P rounds. However, I thought the SP101 would make a good backup woods gun as well as backup city gun.
I have also considred 340PD, but have heard lot of bad things about the durability of the metal alloys used for the lightweight construction of these guns. Seems the space age stuff doesn't hold up as well as the stainless. Also, I hear the recoil on .357 rounds are almost unbearable. I will stay away from this model, despite the bigger price tag.
Anyway, what are peoples thoughts? Should I go with SP101 , s&W 640 or Kahr PM9? I rather not get a Ruger LCP or Kel Tec, as I think they lack the durability that I want in my life saving BUG. I know some will grill me for saying that, but it is my personal opinion.
I have also considred 340PD, but have heard lot of bad things about the durability of the metal alloys used for the lightweight construction of these guns. Seems the space age stuff doesn't hold up as well as the stainless. Also, I hear the recoil on .357 rounds are almost unbearable. I will stay away from this model, despite the bigger price tag.
Anyway, what are peoples thoughts? Should I go with SP101 , s&W 640 or Kahr PM9? I rather not get a Ruger LCP or Kel Tec, as I think they lack the durability that I want in my life saving BUG. I know some will grill me for saying that, but it is my personal opinion.