Personally, resisting/disobeying an EO seems a lot easier than against a law passed by Congress, Senate and then signed into law by the president. So in some way, I'd rather he go that route, have masses, including LE disobey, than have something pushed through Congress like obamacare was. I'm not saying that such legislation would get rammed through, but it's a possibility.
"Enacting" some anti-gun EO would only prove his arrogance and, in my mind, be reason for impeachment, though I'd have to research that just to make sure it would even qualify.
He could "clarify" specific rulings for the EPA, CDC, ATF, etc. to adhere to that isn't expressly explained by law. Such as, material bullets are made of like require them to be biodegradable(?). Or perhaps push for the courts to hand down very strict sentencing for a very small violation of gun law, despite a person doing something by accident or without ill-intent. I can't think of other examples right now. Forgive me if my understanding is off.
"Enacting" some anti-gun EO would only prove his arrogance and, in my mind, be reason for impeachment, though I'd have to research that just to make sure it would even qualify.
What changes could he do with EO?
He could "clarify" specific rulings for the EPA, CDC, ATF, etc. to adhere to that isn't expressly explained by law. Such as, material bullets are made of like require them to be biodegradable(?). Or perhaps push for the courts to hand down very strict sentencing for a very small violation of gun law, despite a person doing something by accident or without ill-intent. I can't think of other examples right now. Forgive me if my understanding is off.
Last edited: