1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Bill to open Kansas deer hunt proposed

Discussion in 'Hunting' started by Drizzt, Mar 12, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Drizzt

    Drizzt Member

    Dec 24, 2002
    Moscow on the Colorado, TX
    Kansas City Star

    March 11, 2003, Tuesday METROPOLITAN EDITION


    LENGTH: 741 words

    HEADLINE: Bill to open Kansas deer hunt proposed;
    Non-residents could get archery permits

    BYLINE: BRENT FRAZEE; The Kansas City Star

    Spencer Tomb doesn't want to see Kansas become another Texas when
    it comes to deer hunting.

    Tomb grew up in the Lone Star State and saw the way prime hunting
    spots went to the highest bidder.

    Tomb, who calls himself "a Texan by birth, a Kansan by choice,"
    now worries that the same thing could soon happen in Kansas if a bill
    in the Kansas Legislature is passed.

    That measure would allow anyone who qualifies for a
    "hunt-on-your-own-land" deer permit to receive a transferable
    archery permit which could be used only on that landowner's property.

    That transferable permit probably would go to non-residents, who
    are clamoring to hunt Kansas because of its national reputation for
    trophy bucks.

    At worst, Tomb said, the state could be flooded with non-resident
    hunters, causing an unregulated growth in leasing.

    Proponents of the bill argue that it would provide farmers added
    income at a time when the economy is tough. And they say that the
    effects on the deer herd and the amount of land that would be tied up
    in leases are being vastly overstated.

    But Tomb isn't so sure. He sees bad things in Kansas' future if
    the bill passes.

    "The average hunter can't find a place to hunt in Texas anymore.
    All the best land is tied up in expensive leases," said Tomb, a
    Manhattan resident who is an avid deer hunter and past president of
    the Kansas Wildlife Federation. "For example, I can't hunt on the
    land where my father first took me deer hunting. It's tied up in a
    25-year lease.

    "I don't want to see that happen in Kansas. We'd be moving
    toward a day where money is the driving force in hunting. We'd be
    selling our deer herd to the highest bidder - and he or she wouldn't
    be a Kansan, I'll tell you that."

    State Rep. Gary Hayzlett, a Republican from Lakin, Kan., thinks
    those fears are unwarranted.

    He crafted the amendment in the House that would allow qualifying
    landowners to transfer archery permits only to non-residents. And he
    remains convinced that it's a measure that could benefit landowners
    and hunters alike.

    "A lot of landowners aren't hunters, but they still suffer crop
    depredation from deer," Hayzlett said. "The money they receive from
    selling their permits would help recoup some of that loss and still
    provide them some added revenue.

    "I've received a lot of positive feedback from landowners. But I
    don't see this as anything that would destroy our deer herd."

    In the past, Kansas had always stubbornly resisted the movement
    toward leasing, even when it became increasingly common in
    neighboring states. But as the state's reputation for trophy deer has
    grown, so has the demand among non-residents for permits.

    Kansas was one of the last states to allow non-residents to hunt
    deer, and even now, has a restrictive permit system. Only 7,500
    non-resident permits were issued last year. About half of that total
    were eligible to be transferred from residents to non-residents.

    Among the 7,500 permits were 2,500 bow hunters - half of the
    number of bow hunters who applied for permits. But the
    "hunt-on-your-own-land" permits have always been non-transferable.

    By allowing an unlimited number of landowners to buy
    "hunt-on-your-own-land" permits and sell them to outfitters or
    non-residents, wildlife officials fear that a closely managed herd
    could quickly be damaged.

    "The biggest problem could be with mule-deer hunting," said
    Chad Luce, public-information officer for the Kansas Department of
    Wildlife and Parks. "That population is limited, and we restrict
    hunting opportunities. Under the present system, we only allow
    non-residents 240 muzzleloader permits, no archery or firearms

    "If this bill were passed, every landowner in western Kansas
    could receive a permit that could be transferred to a non-resident.

    "We would be going from zero harvest to X - a number that could
    be significant. It could have a real impact on the herd."

    The effect on the whitetail herd also could be major, Luce fears.

    "In a worst case, the state could be flooded with non-resident
    archery hunters," Luce said. "The quality of our herd could be
    destroyed. The market could crash."

    The measure, House Bill 2078, passed in the House last week. It
    goes to the Senate Committee on Natural Resources on Thursday. If it
    meets with favorable opinion, it would then go to a Senate vote.
  2. Sisco

    Sisco Member

    Dec 24, 2002
    Hang in there Spencer!!
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page