Blue Trail Range (CT) shut down

Status
Not open for further replies.

Logan5

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2004
Messages
1,155
Location
CT
Yesterday afternoon I swung by the range to have a poke through the shop there, and the DEP and DPS had just shut the place down.

Now, on the site (http://www.bluetrailrange.com/) it still says that it's just the 200 yard range, but I went out again today, and it's the 100 yard range as well. The only things up and running at the moment are the indoor .22 range, the shop, and I guess the snack bar.
Possibly life will go on, but if you're in CT now would be a good time to show support, as I get the impression that Mr. Lyman is feeling understandably discouraged. Rifle ranges run as businesses typically don't generate the kind of money real estate developers have available, and Blue Trail has been fighting for survival for a while I think.
 
Moving To General

Not really activism in the usual sense.

Moving this to General for three reasons: 0) see above, 1) more people will see it, 2) you're more likely to get more actual action if more people see it.
 
A dark day for the people who live in the land of the the Long River.

Blue Trails was a beautiful, historic range. The only one of its type in the area. Old man Lyman used to bring out his Browning machine gun on the Fourth of July.

-Sans Authoritas
 
Allegedly(?), some bullets landed on state park land and also into nearby houses.
Here's a link to a brief Hartford Courant article....

http://www.courant.com/news/local/statewire/hc-30051945.apds.m0306.bc-ct--riflmay30,0,531022.story

WALLINGFORD, Conn. - The owner of a Wallingford rifle range has shut down two shooting lanes for a week while an expert determines whether safety improvements can be made.

Homeowners in nearby Durham have complained after finding bullets embedded in homes. In the most recent incident a bullet shattered a window and a bullet was found on the floor.

State officials say a range safety expert has been hired to determine if the Blue Trail Range can be reopened.

The owner of the range doesn't believe the bullets that have struck homes are coming from the range which is more than a mile away.
 
Well, that's CT for you. I have seen more and more ranges "make accommodations" for the people who move closer to them. In this case, I've used that range a few times. While it wasn't my first choice in ranges due to various rules, it appeared to be situated in a manner that provided a safe backstop. I hope they prove it's a safe place and reopen.

But, in many cases, it's more a problem of folks building closer to ranges and then not wanting the noise or the perceived "loss of real estate value' they suffer because of the range. I know of several ranges that have shut down and many others that have made major changes in their operation to appease their neighbors.

There is a State Police range in Simsbury that is fighting to stay open and a gun club range near them that is having the same problem. Another gun club range in Old Lyme/Niantic area that is fighting hard to stay open. There was a gun club range in Ansonia that may or may not still be there. Another in Oxford that has made a lot of changes in hours of operation. The CT Police Academy range has changed their hours for "accommodation" reasons.

Even the National Guard isn't exempt. Stones Ranch, in Old Lyme was a great training site. Then people started building houses closer and closer. First, the Guard stopped night training involving use of blanks and pyro after 2200 hrs. Then I hear they closed the demo training site. They next restricted the movement of vehicles into the site after a certain hour. It's gotten to the point the Guard can't really train well there anymore.

As the state becomes more densely populated, I anticipate more and more outdoor ranges to close, leaving us with the need to shoot indoors which is another thing I personally don't care for. Of course, the people will go after the indoor ranges next.
 
As an add-on, My PD uses a another PD's range which is in a fairly rich, upper class town. The PD has been under a lot of pressure to close that range. To date, they have successfully kept it at bay.

But, there are either a bunch of stupid people or people that will lie to win. They had a town meeting and a woman who owns a house nearby the range came to request the range be closed. She claimed bullets were landing in her back yard. Her proof? She presented the town committee with a .45cal shell casing she "found in her yard". :rolleyes: Several members of the committee were actually upset by her evidence..... until someone explained parts of ammo to them and how a bullet actually worked. ;)

But, we can't shoot at that range before 9AM because the children "are on their way to school and it's dangerous". We have to stop shooting at 2PM because the children "are getting out of school" and it's likewise dangerous. Use of the range for night training is severely curtailed.

It's that way in most of the Southwest part of the state. It's creeping eastward and north.
 
They have yet to determine if the bullet holes are from the range. I highly doubt it, but the media is playing it up like the shooters were taking aim at the residents homes. :banghead::cuss: I sent a note to the local TV news who made some real inflamatory comments concerning the range. :cuss: Our range in the Montville area came under attack last year. It really was not directed towards us, but the consequences of the town ordinace would have closed us down. We fought back and it was clear the ordinace would not pass. We have to stay vigilant keep the developers from moving in too close. I've heard of clubs posting big signs on their boundries to discourage new development on adjacent land. I hope the DEP gets to the bottom of problem, but I won't hold my breath. :rolleyes:
 
I hope that this problem is debunked as easily as some cases in the past where, as 209 touched on, the evidence was either an empty case or a loaded, unfired cartridge. I believe the latter was the case in Cara Donna Provisions VS the Braintree (MA) Rod & Gun Club.
 
209-
Just a small correction on your statement...the range in Simsbury the local homeowners are trying to close up is Metacon, not the State Police range....they are right next to each other, but the H.O.'s probably didn't want to fight the state...
 
Always sad to see a range get closed. Is this by any chance the range in CT that recently had a fire from the use of tracers? My family is from CT and I was born in Bridgeport so I try and keep an eye on CT happenings.
 
Is this by any chance the range in CT that recently had a fire from the use of tracers?

Have not heard of that one. Ledyard was closed down a couple years ago for rifle rounds leaving the range and I'm sure if they are open yet. Metacon is one that's had its hands full dealing with developments close by, but I don't think any rounds left the range I think that was brought about by some rich lawyers who didn't like hearing the noise.
 
Blue Trail Legal Fund

Saw this link elsewhere...

http://www.savebluetrailrange.org

Didn't know if it was legit so I called. They said that it is so I sent in some $$. I have a feeling they are gonna need it as the first of the frivolous lawsuits has already been filed. :cuss:

http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DispDetail.asp?DocNum=NNH-CV-08-4031580-S :banghead:

Its time that we help them out. The Lyman family is key to shooting and shooting sports and without blue trail, shooting will be impacted not just locally or regionally, but nationally. :(
 
But is it the range owner's fault if some bonehead popped off a round at a 45 degree angle? Arrest the bonehead for reckless endangerment. Unless the range was actually dangerous with an insufficient backstop I think this is a case of going after the wrong guy.
 
I am a lifelong CT resident. I do not have any hard evidence but every news report that I saw showed empty cases in the yards of the individuals homes that were complaining, not bullets!!!. I saw on two seperate news channels the sheep being showed what was suppossed to be bullets lodged in someones roof. Again they were showing spent casings sitting on someones roof.

I am certain that an occasional bullet actually makes its way near some house since they have been building closer and closer for the last 30 years. It is just a matter of time before the range closes. Blue Trails has had to defend itself agaisnt lawsuits and complaining neighbors for as long as I have been alive. Eventually the owners will simply tiring of spending money to defend itself against people who want nothing more than for the place to shotdown. Not to co-exist.:banghead:
 
kd7nqb said:
Is this by any chance the range in CT that recently had a fire from the use of tracers?

Yes, late March.

But what I don't understand about this whole mess is that there is a huge mountain between the range and the home that supposedly got hit by rounds 1.5 miles away.

I smell a dirty rat. :scrutiny:

It's my understanding that the Metacon Gun Club in Simsbury prevailed in the lawsuit to shut it down. :D
 
I was going to say something (very low road :fire:) about this situation, but sent some $$ to the people trying to save Blue Trail instead...
 
I read a report on another forum that quoted the Hartford (?) newspaper, and then said the woman being interviewed by the paper was showing the reporter a complete round (case, bullet and all) and claiming that this was what had "shot" her house.

I can only hope that an attorney gets some of these twits on the stand, has them testify as to how their houses were "shot" with empty cases and complete cartridges -- and then gets them nailed for perjury. The thing is, this is being investigated by state police officers. They should be smart enough to know the difference between a cartridge, a spent case, and a bullet. Why aren't they arresting these dweebs for filing false reports?
 
The backstops at the blue trail range seem more than adequate but if you look up at the courrigated roof above the firing line you can clearly see large holes shot through it. some holes even going through the thick steel support beams. so it seems a few jerks that dont understand or ignore gun safety are causing this trouble.

when you go to shoot they assign you a firing position and IIRC they take your id. they should just put in a few CCTV cameras and when they see bubba at position 10 horsing around shooting at a 45 degree angle or purposely putting rounds through the roof they should call the police and have these morons arrested.

on several occasions ive also seen people wildly bump firing AR's ignoring commands over the PA system to cease fire and not stopping until the range officer came storming over and escorted them to their cars and off the property.

there has been a lot of high-dollar housing being built in that area and tons of people moving in and they think that the range should operate around them even though it was there
before they were even born.

Some of my fondest memories are of going to blue trail with my father and learning how to shoot. I would hate to see them shut down they are a great group of people who own and operate the range.
 
there has been a lot of high-dollar housing being built in that area and tons of people moving in and they think that the range should operate around them even though it was there
before they were even born.

If rounds are in fact escaping from the range, then what difference does it make who got there first? If my great grandfather hunted on the land that your house is built on, does that give me the right to come over and shoot up your house?

I don't have any sympathy for people who object to sounds/smells/appearance of pre-exsiting businesses, but if the article is correct, rounds are escaping from the range.

Homeowners in nearby Durham have complained after finding bullets embedded in homes. In the most recent incident a bullet shattered a window and a bullet was found on the floor.

If rounds are escaping from the range, homeowners have every right to object and or sue the range. If rounds are not escaping from the range, then I think their complaints lack merit. But "who was there first" doesn't make any difference to my way of thinking.

To my mind, my property rights preclude you from using my property as down range bullet catch because you it's inconvenient/expensive for your to arrange to keep your bullets on your property! :)

Mike
 
In an ideal situation a range owns/controls the full downrange possible shotfall zone, which is around 3-5 miles deep, depending on the rifle round being fired. If it does not, their only likely long-term hope is to retrofit as a "baffle" range. In a non-baffle/short template range configuration, sooner or later some expletive-deleted will launch a round over the backstop into a neighbor's property. Seen stuff like that close ranges locally that didn't have a full-depth shotfall template.
 
On Cam and Company the other day,
the owner was on the show and said the person that started the lawsuit is a developer on the other side of the mountain in front of the range.
The mountain in question is between the range and the developers house, Ranges backstop, developers backyard.
The developer said he has found bullet holes in his house and therefore
jeopardizing his soon to be developed land. according to the range owner the bullet holes in question are in the side of the developers house not the rear (Bullets don't turn corners)
The range owner said that their are areas where people go to shoot that are to sides of the developers house.

The owner of the range is in progress of building more barriers. they are also looking for support via donations through the website previously posted.
I have already sent them a few bucks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top