[Boston, MA] New Gun Control Billboard

Status
Not open for further replies.

KnifeLawGuy

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
33
Location
Northeast
New gun control billboard from the state that gave us the gift of Ted Kennedy and John Kerry. Sigh.

From: http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2007/07/10/gun_control_message_is_put_across/

Gun control message is put across
By Michael Levenson, Globe Staff | July 10, 2007

It looks like a ransom note, but it is not being sent by kidnappers. It is being promoted by the Patrick administration, the Boston Police Department, and the State Police, and delivered to drivers on the Massachusetts Turnpike courtesy of John Rosenthal, a provocative gun control activist from Newton. [emphasis added]

"We have your President and Congress," declares the message in letters that look as if they had been snipped from a newspaper. It is signed simply, NRA, referring to the National Rifle Association, and will be unveiled today on a 252-foot billboard on the Mass. Turnpike near Fenway Park.

The message is the latest from Rosenthal, founder of Stop Handgun

Violence, who has for more than a decade used the billboard, which he owns, to promote stricter gun laws. In the past, he has erected a mock road sign that declared, "Welcome to Massa chusetts -- You're More Likely to Live Here," because Massachusetts has "the most effective gun laws," and a display that featured photos of 15 children who were shot to death, under the slogan, "The cost of handguns keeps going up. 15 kids killed every day."

His latest message has drawn support from Lieutenant Governor Timothy P. Murray, Public Safety Secretary Kevin M. Burke, Boston Police Commissioner Edward F. Davis, and State Police Colonel Mark Delaney, all of whom plan to attend a press conference to unveil the billboard today. [emphasis added]

It has also drawn the ire of gun owners' groups, starting with the NRA. "It's a shameless publicity ploy, and I think that's all we can say to describe it," said Andrew Arulanandam, a spokesman for the NRA.

He took issue in particular with the notion that the NRA is holding Congress hostage.

"The NRA works with members from both sides of the aisle, and we have supporters on the Republican side, as well as the Democratic side," Arulanandam said. "The simple fact is that gun control has been proven to be a political liability. What you see happening in Congress is a reflection of how the country feels. The vast majority of American voters believe in what the NRA stands for."

Jim Wallace, executive director of Gun Owners' Action League of Massachusetts, called the mock ransom note "a scare message."

"I thought these guys were supposed to be an educational organization," Wallace said. "Are they now just a political organization?"

Rosenthal said he wants the billboard to draw attention to the so-called gun-show loophole, which allows buyers in 32 states to purchase a firearm without a criminal background check if they buy from a private vendor. Part of the billboard declares, "Guns kill 83 people every day in the US. Demand federal laws for background checks on all gun sales."

Rosenthal said that only buyers from federally licensed vendors must pass criminal background checks, even though private sellers, such as those at gun shows and on the Internet, account for 50 percent of all gun sales nationwide. He said the NRA is protecting the exemption with lavish donations to members of Congress.

"You need an ID to cash a check at a supermarket, but you can buy an unlimited number of easily concealable handguns and military-style weapons in 32 states and at thousands of gun shows without even an ID," Rosenthal said. "Post 9/11, that is insane, and it's a big part of the problem with gun violence in this county and in Massachusetts."

Davis said gang members from Massachusetts have been known to travel as far away as California to take advantage of less stringent gun laws, making it more difficult to regulate the flow of guns into some of Boston's most violent neighborhoods.

The billboard "does point out the control the NRA has had over our congressional leaders and how difficult it is to have a common-sense conversation about guns," Davis said.

To date, 32 people have been killed in Boston this year, 26 with guns. Last year by this date, 37 had been killed, 26 with guns.

Mayor Thomas M. Menino most recently condemned the NRA after 8-year-old Liquarry Jefferson of Dorchester was shot to death, apparently by a 7-year-old cousin who used a gun left within easy reach. Menino and Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York plan to testify before Congress today in support of tougher gun laws.

Arulanandam said past attempts to require background checks for guns purchased from private vendors have included a mandatory 72-hour waiting period. The waiting period is a problem because most gun shows run 48 hours, he said.

"Let's be realistic here: The real intent is to try to legislate gun shows out of existence," said Arulanandam.

But Peter Hamm, spokesman for the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence in Washington, said the billboard was on target.

"I don't think the billboard sounds like it overstates the political reality at all," Hamm said. "I'm sure it's going to generate a certain amount of controversy because of the nature of it, but that's good old John. He gets people's attention."

Michael Levenson can be reached at [email protected].
 
Yeah--if it isn't actionable libel, perhaps the NRA should simply start its own ad campaign. Something like this, maybe, in a cut-from-magazines font: "We have your guns and your children. Do not resist. --Deval Patrick"

--Len.
 
"It is being promoted by the Patrick administration, the Boston Police Department, and the Police State ..."

There; fixed it for 'em.
 
Davis said gang members from Massachusetts have been known to travel as far away as California to take advantage of less stringent gun laws...

Yes indeed, it is obviously clear that California needs to tighten up its gun laws. :rolleyes:
 
As a gun hobbyist and embarrassed resident of the Peoples' Republic, let me (once again) apologize to the rest of the country for the lack of sanity in these parts.

I'm sure that some, perhaps many, of you know, but it's worth mentioning again, that the John Rosenthal that's responsible for this and similar billboards is the same John Rosenthal who's the driving force behind the American Hunters and Shooters Association (AHSA), which purports to be an NRA-alternative gun rights group, but is in fact really no better than the Brady Bunch. Just in case you come across some of their literature and are tempted to join.
 
Speaking as one who was born in Boston....

Kennedys, total gun control, collapsing tunnels, and bomb squads that end the careers of people running viral marketing campaigns....

What's to love about that place?

The Adams' must be rolling over in their graves.
 
I would love to see pro gun billboards up! If I were rich, or there was some way to contribute to such a thing, I would do it in a second.
 
Rosenthal said he wants the billboard to draw attention to the so-called gun-show loophole

Which, of course, doesn't apply to Massachusetts, where you have to posses an ID card and register all guns with the state anyway.
 
States, Cities, counties, get what they vote for. If these people were not voted into office the problem would not exist. It looks like the voters in the NE for years have chosen this type of government.
In most states this type of sign would be torn down every time it was put up. I just don't see the GRIT from the folks in the NE.:evil:
 
Who has seen that Boston billboard near Fenway over the bridge? It says background checks stop crime. Then lists states with a handgun under them . Vermont has an UZI, Georgia has a massive revolver, NH has a glock. It's funny. The worse they perceive the laws to be the more "Scary" sillhouette of a gun is used.
 
One reason I dislike the NRA is that they have completely abandoned ten of thousands of gun owners in the Commonwealth years ago for greener pastures. You will not find many pro NRA gun owners in this state because of the NRA unwilling to help when we needed it the most. There is only on pro RKBA organization in this state and they barely have the resources to fight the good fight. Giving up and moving to another state is not an option. If the NRA would help us i would change my view of them, but as of now I will not support them since they are hypocrites.

The sad thing is now we are going to be broad sided by the antis in the coming years to make up for their losses in the past several years. I am pretty sure we will not have the power to stop them this time around since they vastly out number us. Kinda reminds me of the movie 300. I feel once we fall they will spread their message to the rest of New England which will not be hard to do, since many antis have moved into this region over the years, and are now make up a growing voting black while pro gunners are either dieing or moving far away. I will not be surprised in twenty years that NE is more like England.

Also many people on this board make the mistake, as do many Bostonians that Massachusetts is Boston, and the rest of the state does not exist. When in reality the rest of the state all the way to the NY boarder is, with some exceptions, very different the the elitists haven of metro Boston area.
 
Trust me I know what you mean. I'm on the mass border so I'm in Mass a lot. Ans I also have to travel into Boston often. They are not the same thing.
 
Although I appreciate your distress, there's another way to look at the situation you describe.

What you see is that there is only one pro-gun organization with few resources because the NRA won't support it, so the gun owners of Massachusetts won't support the NRA.

Looked at the other way, the gun owners of Massachusetts won't support either the NRA or even the one pro-gun organization in the state. That does seem like a lost cause to me.

If Massachusetts gun owners won't support pro-gun activities in their own state and won't support the NRA either, it makes good sense for the NRA to spend my money in other states with more vigorous--and far less dependent--gun owners. I say "my money" because the NRA/ILA gets its political action funds from people who contribute money to support those activities. I do contribute.
 
Looked at the other way, the gun owners of Massachusetts won't support either the NRA or even the one pro-gun organization in the state.

While there are gun owners here that do not support the RKBA, most do support it by becoming members of GOAL our local RKBA organization. Even ones that do not belong to GOAL, do actively get involved in the RKBA issues. Many gun owners do not belong to the NRA because their backstabbing gun owners in this state in the late 1990s. As one can see the anti effort in Mass effects every gun owners in NE, since that is their effort to ban gun is all of NE.
 
What's to love about that place?

As someone who also grew up there, the only thing I could think of that I really miss is Fenway Park. That's it.
 
These people should be taken to task by law abiding gun owners and make their Governer, State Police, and other Agencies back away from speaking out against a legal, lawful enterprise.

Slamming the NRA by this coalition should be viewed as slander by any judge anywhere. Even in Massachussettes!
 
These people should be taken to task by law abiding gun owners and make their Governer, State Police, and other Agencies back away from speaking out against a legal, lawful enterprise.

They will be by GOAL. But no one will hear it, since GOAL's response will not be carried by any media in this state. The Antis control all the media in this state, and dictate policy.
 
I'm a life member of the NRA. I'm not a huge fan of how they do business. But they are the 800 lb gorilla, and are useful as a scapegoat in the press, and do do a lot of training and promotion, and do help and even run quite a few RKBA things.

I don't think it's fair to attack them for not being more active in Massivechewed$#!+ or Kali. Any money they spend there they may as well burn and flush.

But if they can get enough changes elsewhere, those states will have to follow along.

I don't bother writing to my local fascist, I mean RINO, Woody Burton, because nothing I say will matter, and he'll hang up on me like the whining coward he is. I haven't "Abandoned" my position. I just choose to put my efforts in a more productive direction.

A friend of mine was pushing to buy land for a billboard up in the NW part of IN, to read

WELCOME TO CHICAGO. KISS YOUR DEFENSELESS BUTT GOODBYE.

and a link to his site.

It would still be great, I think.
 
gang members from Massachusetts have been known to travel
as far away as California to take advantage of less stringent gun laws
--Boston Police Commissioner Edward F. Davis


Does anyone with experience with California gun laws believe this?
(Gang members from Massachusetts may buy guns from gang
members in California because the gangs have an efficient
black market system due to the Massachusetts style laws in PRK.)

The poster comes from Rosenthal of American Hunters and Shooters
Association (the sham website front set up by DCS for the DLC,
pretending to be a Democratic gun owners membership group).
 
The billboard "does point out the control the NRA has had over our congressional leaders and how difficult it is to have a common-sense conversation about guns," Davis said

Funny. Most conversations you hear about, and most I've been in, with Anti-gun folks tends to be filled with anti-gun emotional outbursts with a little real fact thrown in by the pro-gun people. The simple fact is, what they call "common-sense" is actually "be entirely defenseless, because someone could get hurt". Common sense to a pro-2A person is "I have a gun so that I and my family don't die needlessly"

It's an issue of values, of which most antis seem to have contradictory ones.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top