Zen21Tao
Member
http://www.bradycampaign.org/blog/
Over the past few month other gun owners and I have been posting comments in response to Paul Helmke's blog on the Brady Campaign web site (see link below). We gun owners, ( I have been around for the past 4 threads), have been ‘owning’ the site.
Only three gun-control folks not working for the Brad’s (Kelli, her husband Respondeant Superior, and Karen ) have been trying to stick up for the Brady’s view. Karen seems to only ask a few questions and not attempt to engage anyone, Kelli (the funniest unstable Brady nit wit) claims absurd things then when asked to support her statements she claims to be the victim of harassment, and Respondeant, well he only comes to Kelli’s defense on a rare occasion. Karen and Respondeant post very little. Kelli, for the most part, is a sole voice for the Brady’s.
Zach Ragbourn, who works for the Brady Campaign, has also come in trying to present logical arguments but he bids a fast retreat when his points are successfully counter argued. Unlike Kelli, he actually tries to use facts and logic. However, the facts just aren’t in his favor.
As I said, Kelli is the one posting most often. Her posts are worth reading, if only for the ridiculousness of them. For example, in post #43 of the “Mandating Guns” thread she claims James Madison has said the 2nd Amendment is a collective right for the state militia not individual citizens. She was countered with the founders’ (including Madison’s) own words and numerous Supreme Court rulings both showing the 2nd Amendment is, and always has been, an individual right of the people. Her response, post #69, was that “knowledge isn’t always the same as insight, into an issue.” She had now facts to support he beliefs but had plenty of emotion and “insight.” When asked to further support her claims she refused to do so saying she being “egged on” and “harassed.”
I encourage anyone who wants to make their opposition to the Brady’s known to join us in completely debunking Paul’s poorly crafted arguments. Plus, trying to get Kelli to actually answer questions in prettty fun too.
Over the past few month other gun owners and I have been posting comments in response to Paul Helmke's blog on the Brady Campaign web site (see link below). We gun owners, ( I have been around for the past 4 threads), have been ‘owning’ the site.
Only three gun-control folks not working for the Brad’s (Kelli, her husband Respondeant Superior, and Karen ) have been trying to stick up for the Brady’s view. Karen seems to only ask a few questions and not attempt to engage anyone, Kelli (the funniest unstable Brady nit wit) claims absurd things then when asked to support her statements she claims to be the victim of harassment, and Respondeant, well he only comes to Kelli’s defense on a rare occasion. Karen and Respondeant post very little. Kelli, for the most part, is a sole voice for the Brady’s.
Zach Ragbourn, who works for the Brady Campaign, has also come in trying to present logical arguments but he bids a fast retreat when his points are successfully counter argued. Unlike Kelli, he actually tries to use facts and logic. However, the facts just aren’t in his favor.
As I said, Kelli is the one posting most often. Her posts are worth reading, if only for the ridiculousness of them. For example, in post #43 of the “Mandating Guns” thread she claims James Madison has said the 2nd Amendment is a collective right for the state militia not individual citizens. She was countered with the founders’ (including Madison’s) own words and numerous Supreme Court rulings both showing the 2nd Amendment is, and always has been, an individual right of the people. Her response, post #69, was that “knowledge isn’t always the same as insight, into an issue.” She had now facts to support he beliefs but had plenty of emotion and “insight.” When asked to further support her claims she refused to do so saying she being “egged on” and “harassed.”
I encourage anyone who wants to make their opposition to the Brady’s known to join us in completely debunking Paul’s poorly crafted arguments. Plus, trying to get Kelli to actually answer questions in prettty fun too.
