Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Browning Buck Mark for a starter bullseye .22?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by HDCamel, Mar 10, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HDCamel

    HDCamel Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    796
    Location:
    Virginia
    Somehow got it in my head that I'd like to start shooting in a more formal context than the backyard redneckery that I've been participating in. Since I mostly shoot one-handed, off-hand anyway (and since IDPA/IPSC hold no real interest for me), Conventional Pistol competition seems the way to go.

    Consensus among the cognoscenti seems to be that rimfire is the way to start getting into the sport, so I poked around the shops and found a wide array of options. I found that the Buck Mark had the best ergonomics and balance for me. The thing is, I only have 2 vastly different configurations available locally. The Micro Bull with a 4" bull barrel and a stainless Plus with 5.5" slab-side barrel.

    Obviously, the longer sight radius is generally better for precision shooting, but it's a whole $200 more and, as I understand it, replacement barrels for the Buck Mark are easy to find and easy to swap.

    So, should I get one, the other, or am I pursuing the wrong line of thinking?
     
  2. Pilot

    Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    6,652
    Location:
    USA
    Nothing wrong with the Buckmark as a starting point. I would stick with at least a five inch, bull, or slabside barrel. It gives a longer sight radius, and more weight up front which helps steady the gun, and reduce the already very low recoil/muzzle rise.

    You may want to also consider the 5.5 inch barrel Target Model Ruger MK II/III. There are many more after market parts for the Rugers that enable tuning, and accurizing to help the pistol grow with your skills.
     
  3. anothernewb

    anothernewb Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,190
    Location:
    West Central MN
    Buckmark hunter is a long barrel version too. 7" I believe. also comes with fiber optic front.

    I have one and love it, and wouldn't hesitate to use it in a competition
     
  4. Wishoot

    Wishoot Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,338
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    While I'm far from being part of the elite cognoscenti class, either one of these options will serve you well.

    I have the Buckmark Camper URX and it's a wonderful shooter. Incredibly accurate and ergonomic.
     
  5. toivo

    toivo Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,488
    Location:
    New York State
    Buck Mark is a great starter bullseye pistol. It's what I used until I got my S&W 41, and I still have the Buck Mark in my range box as a back-up.

    Check out RimfireCentral.com for info on how to tweak the trigger. Consider adding an overtravel-adjustable trigger too.

    I like the slabside barrel, but honestly I don't think there's much of an accuracy advantage. But I'm a red-dot user; with iron sights, the longer barrel could make a difference.
     
  6. jfrey

    jfrey Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    Messages:
    909
    Location:
    South Texas Coast
    Skip any Ruger and get the BM slabside. You won't be sorry. You can work on the trigger and do the Heggis spring flip yourself and come out with a wonderful trigger from the parts already in the gun. Find the ammo it likes and shoot the fool out of it. Just oil it once in a while and you are good to go. I actually tear mine down every thousand rounds or so and do a deep cleaning. Other than that they are great pistols and will last a lifetime. Folks have a hard time believing me but mine is just as accurate and the trigger is better than my FILs model 41, even after he sent it to Clark for a work over.

    Check out rimfirecentral.com. There is a wealth of info there.
     
  7. HDCamel

    HDCamel Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    796
    Location:
    Virginia
    Thanks for the input.
    I'll pick up the slab side next paycheck.
     
  8. HDCamel

    HDCamel Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    796
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ended up getting the Ruger MkIII Target instead. Don't know why, but for some reason it felt better in my hand than last time. Add in that it was cheaper AND the aftermarket support and it really was kind of a no-brainer.

    I may still get a Buck Mark down the road though.

    WP_20140405_002.jpg
     
  9. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    34,348
    Location:
    Central PA
    Oooh! Nice choice! Looks almost identical to my MkII. If you can ever outshoot it ... well, good luck with that! :)
     
  10. jimherb

    jimherb Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    128
    Location:
    South Puget Sound, WA
    You can't do better for the price. Mine is dead-nuts accurate.
     
  11. murf

    murf Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2010
    Messages:
    3,206
    Location:
    arizona
    congrats! ready for bullseye competition right out of the box.

    murf
     
  12. Big Shrek

    Big Shrek Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2014
    Messages:
    261
    Location:
    Florida Panhandle
    Just wait until you do a detail strip, then you'll wish you had a Buckmark ;)
     
  13. tuj

    tuj Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,983
    Location:
    Houston
    one tip: bullseye shooting is a lot easier if you use a red dot.

    IMG_20121006_101836_sm.jpg
     
  14. Esoxchaser

    Esoxchaser Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    360
    Location:
    Motown
    Good choice. My stock MarkIII Hunter is amazingly accurate, even better than a few I shoot against with three times it's cost much invested in them.
     
  15. HDCamel

    HDCamel Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    796
    Location:
    Virginia
    I'll be content with irons for now. Can't really afford to go hog wild with mods and additions and I never really liked optics anyway. I'll just add things slowly over the course of time as I need them. Probably the first thing I change will be the trigger.
     
  16. ChairborneRanger

    ChairborneRanger Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Messages:
    118
    Location:
    Arizona
    If you change out your factory sear for a Volquartsen sear, I believe that you'll find that your trigger pull dramatically improves. I'd also suggest that you consider installing a BAM bushing and replacing the LCI with a metal insert.
    The Ruger III is difficult to strip----however-----you will eventually get the hang of it. Watch the Ruger videos on disassembly and reassembly and bookmark them. The Ruger is a well made and very solid pistol, much "meatier" than the inexpensive cast parts and screws used to hold-together the Buckmark, IMHO.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page