Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Browning Semi-Auto .22 - Scope Advice

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by westtx28, Mar 2, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. westtx28

    westtx28 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    128
    Location:
    Texas
    I've been wanting a Browning SA-22 for a while and saw an old Belgium in a gun shop the other day that had a Browning scope mounted on it. The scope had a built in mount that attached to the grooves on the receiver. I came back and started doing some google research on this scope and apparently it is a Redfield rim-fire 4X that was branded for Browning. I also found that most people feel the best way to scope a take down rifle is with a barrel mount which this obviously is not. I'd like to go with the conventional wisdom and go with a different set up but the old scope with it's ring-less base went with the rifle so well I'm compelled to give up some accuracy for the beauty of the rifle. I know this is blasphemy to some but it's just the way I roll.

    Any thoughts or opinions on this.

    I should have taken a picture of the actual gun but found one that looks exactly the same below:

    [​IMG]
     
  2. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    Try it, you may like it.

    Anyway, if Browning didn't think it would work fine, they wouldn't have sold that scope & mount for it.
    Which is a very desirable Browning scope by the way!

    I have the Browning barrel mount on mine, because it doesn't have a grooved receiver.

    But I always wished that it did.

    You have to take off the rear sight to use the barrel mount, and I really would rather have not.

    Anyway, the only advantage is "return to zero" when the take-down feature is used.
    But as long as the barrel take-up sleeve is set correctly, there is no barrel movement on the receiver when assembled, and it does return to zero when you take it apart for cleaning.

    rc
     
  3. DM~

    DM~ Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,240
    Location:
    upper mid west
    They are "take down" guns, so having the scope mount on the bbl., will give you MUCH better accuracy/repeatability,

    [​IMG]

    I'd want it mounted on the bbl...

    Yes, the scope is a Redfield with Browning on it...

    DM
     
  4. rule303

    rule303 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,586
    Location:
    MN
    The little Browning will never be a tack driver anyhow, they are just a sweet handling, fun to shoot rifle. I have a mid 60's model with the same Browning scope, it shoots well enough for my purposes. If you must have a cantilevered mount, I would find a newer model and leave that one for a collector.
     
  5. GCBurner

    GCBurner Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,853
    My receiver isn't grooved, so I got the Browning mount that replaces the rear sight on the barrel. I put on a red dot optic, and it holds its zero perfectly; the little gun is a very accurate plinker. Note that when you install the grooved tip-off scope mount on the receiver, you can't use the rear sight anyway.
     
  6. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    No, but you can take the scope off and use the sights if you want too.

    With the barrel mount you can't.

    As for it never being a tack driver?
    Well I sure never heard any 50 yard head shot squrrels complain about the accuracy.

    rc
     
  7. tlynch

    tlynch Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    33
    Location:
    Central Texas
    My Browning is the most accurate .22 I own. Actually, probably my most accurate gun, period. I shoot it as well with iron sights as my daughter shoots her Marlin with a scope.

    Regards,
    Tom
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page