I guess the 3 judges in the 9th settled the issue for everyone. Even the decision of the rest of the 9th circuit or SCOTUS if it rules on the case doesn't matter.
EDITORIAL: Bucking the NRA
updated: 05/16/2003 09:35 AM
ASSAULT WEAPONS
PRESIDENT George W. Bush surprised many when he decided to buck the National Rifle Association and throw his support behind a renewal of the ban on assault weapons. The NRA has made this issue one of its key legislative priorities.
Mr. Bush isn't giving up much by siding with the anti-gun lobby on this issue. The Washington Post reports that GOP House leaders are thinking of not renewing the ban by dropping the issue and not bringing it to a vote. If Mr. Bush is sincere about wanting a ban, he should insist that these GOP leaders take up the issue.
There are other real tests of Mr. Bush's commitment to rational gun-control laws. One is what he allows his attorney general, John Ashcroft, to do about federal background checks. Mr. Ashcroft wants to have federal background checks on gun sales destroyed after 24 hours. This would thwart efforts to track down suspected criminals, such as those behind the deadly attacks in the D.C. sniper case. Moreover, Mr. Ashcroft has offered a curiously literal interpretation of the Second Amendment's guarantee of gun ownership rights. Last December, a three-member panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that the amendment protects only the right of states to organize and maintain militias. Mr. Ashcroft thinks it protects an individual's gun rights.
The other issue is whether Mr. Bush will buck Congress' move to shield gun makers and dealers from lawsuits, such as those filed by relatives of two victims in the D.C. sniper case. Mr. Bush should listen to gun opponents who want gun makers and dealers to be held accountable for the harm done by their products. Some gun makers knowingly ship weapons to unscrupulous dealers who do business with straw buyers and others who funnel weapons to criminals. St. Louis is one of the cities that have filed lawsuits against makers and dealers. The outcome of these suits could depend on whether Mr. Bush is willing to veto potential legislation that enacts a broad shield for the makers and dealers.
The president should listen to law enforcement officials who are trying to rid neighborhoods of guns used in street crimes. As St. Louis Police Chief Joe Mokwa has pointed out, most guns confiscated from gangs aren't stolen, but bought from straw buyers. A shield would make it harder for police to thwart such weapons trafficking.
While it's commendable that Mr. Bush has decided to support the ban on assault weapons, he could do even more by requiring Mr. Ashcroft to reread the Second Amendment and by holding gun makers and dealers accountable.
EDITORIAL: Bucking the NRA
updated: 05/16/2003 09:35 AM
ASSAULT WEAPONS
PRESIDENT George W. Bush surprised many when he decided to buck the National Rifle Association and throw his support behind a renewal of the ban on assault weapons. The NRA has made this issue one of its key legislative priorities.
Mr. Bush isn't giving up much by siding with the anti-gun lobby on this issue. The Washington Post reports that GOP House leaders are thinking of not renewing the ban by dropping the issue and not bringing it to a vote. If Mr. Bush is sincere about wanting a ban, he should insist that these GOP leaders take up the issue.
There are other real tests of Mr. Bush's commitment to rational gun-control laws. One is what he allows his attorney general, John Ashcroft, to do about federal background checks. Mr. Ashcroft wants to have federal background checks on gun sales destroyed after 24 hours. This would thwart efforts to track down suspected criminals, such as those behind the deadly attacks in the D.C. sniper case. Moreover, Mr. Ashcroft has offered a curiously literal interpretation of the Second Amendment's guarantee of gun ownership rights. Last December, a three-member panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that the amendment protects only the right of states to organize and maintain militias. Mr. Ashcroft thinks it protects an individual's gun rights.
The other issue is whether Mr. Bush will buck Congress' move to shield gun makers and dealers from lawsuits, such as those filed by relatives of two victims in the D.C. sniper case. Mr. Bush should listen to gun opponents who want gun makers and dealers to be held accountable for the harm done by their products. Some gun makers knowingly ship weapons to unscrupulous dealers who do business with straw buyers and others who funnel weapons to criminals. St. Louis is one of the cities that have filed lawsuits against makers and dealers. The outcome of these suits could depend on whether Mr. Bush is willing to veto potential legislation that enacts a broad shield for the makers and dealers.
The president should listen to law enforcement officials who are trying to rid neighborhoods of guns used in street crimes. As St. Louis Police Chief Joe Mokwa has pointed out, most guns confiscated from gangs aren't stolen, but bought from straw buyers. A shield would make it harder for police to thwart such weapons trafficking.
While it's commendable that Mr. Bush has decided to support the ban on assault weapons, he could do even more by requiring Mr. Ashcroft to reread the Second Amendment and by holding gun makers and dealers accountable.