Bulldog Pug .44: Perfect carry revolver?

Status
Not open for further replies.
In .44 Special, the longer the barrel is the better. I like the "classic" 3" version. The grip is the hard part to conceal, not the barrel. I bought my first Bulldog in 1979 and paid $115 for it new!
 
I wanted a Bulldog - I just couldn't find anyone who had one - or had owned one - with a fond remembrance. I remembered the Ti .44's that graced American Rifleman ('98?) - and wanted a Taurus all-Ti 445 or a S&W 296. I found the latter at $359 locally on closeout nine years ago - less than half the last MSRP. They also had a new 696, also canned, but for their 'regular' price of $439. Just days later - at the range - my carry and NIB AMT DAO Backups in .45 ACP both jammed - I cleaned them both and traded them on the 296 & 696 on the way home. I got $400 for the pair - and another $10 off the S&W's because I bought both. I was happy. Sadly, the 296 had to be carried in an OWB pancake holster - until I got Mr. Mika to make me a pocket holster for it:

IMG_3867-1.jpg

That combo is a pocket carry in 3/4 of my pants' front pockets (A 642 gets 100% carry.). The original boot grips are back - and those GA Arms 200gr Gold Dots, like the CCI Blazer Al-cased variant I carried for years (No more - one split in my 696!), make right at 800 fps from the 2.5" barrel. That's enough to fully open in gelatin - quite impressive! That's been 95+% of it's diet of 2.5k + rounds thus far. When I am in the woods, the first round is a 240gr LSWC. The recoil in the 19+ oz humpback with the OEM boots is 'significant'. Of course, a simple grip change improves that quite a bit - just try to get the X-frame grip in your pocket:

IMG_0713.jpg

Absurd? Talk about universal fit, those grips fit K, L, N, X, & Z frames! Of course, the Charter Arms designed HKS speedloaders, #CA44, fit the 296/696 quite well. I don't think the hammer on the Bulldog will fare well in my pocket - did they ever make it with an enclosed hammer?

I still find myself looking at the Charter Arms revolvers at my enabler's lair. Thanks to this thread, I may just look more closely... it would be an ideal car gun. Good to read positive results with the little beast!

Stainz
 
I had the Classic back in 1977 or so. Forget what I paid.

It never gave me a problem. It started out tight, but loosened up a bit in 2-300 rds. Still, it was well within tolerances. After testing it, I carried it at my part time job at a gunstore.

Sold it to help finance my first 1911, but I liked it.
 
I picked up a nearly new Tarus 431 with 3" barrel, stainless. Been reloading with a variety of bullets 180-240 gr. It's routinely by my side. A lot of fun to shoot, too!
 
Just for info on a similar vane.... Charter Arms is introducing a PITBULL basically a .40 SW Bulldog with no need for Moon clips. Looks interesting. I've always been enamored of the Bulldog, Just never found one with a trigger that felt "right" and being stuck in CA there are not a lot of them to try. All the Smith 696s go for a fortune IF you find one. The price on a new Bulldog is very reasonable.
 
Rumor has it that Charter Arms will introduce a .45 ACP revolver next. I reload both the
.44 Special and .45 ACP and use the same exact powder charge. Preformance should be about the same.
 
I've had a couple. Between timing issues and light hits, I gave up. Been thinking about getting one of the new ones and giving it a try.
I've had a 296. It just seemed to big to be pocketable, and I have no problem with a 696, or even a 624 if I am going to wear a belt holster, so it didn't make the cut either.
 
They anounced these rimless ejector models at the SHOT Show several years back but are just now getting around to making them. Business was so good during the "Obama panic" that they did not want to allocate recources to new products when they were busy selling existing models of revolvers as fast as they could make them. The story was that when these new rimless ejector models went into production that the .40 would be released first followed by a .45ACP version and then one in 9MM.

BTW the .40 S&W ballistics are identical to the old .38/40 revolver round with a 180 grain .400" diamiter bullet traveling at the same velocity.
 
I have a Rossi 720 and a Taurus 431.
Both are awesome carry weapons. Not under gunned with one of them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top