Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Caliber war, 38 super vs 40 S&W

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Brian Williams, Nov 4, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Brian Williams

    Brian Williams Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,834
    Location:
    Kampong Cham, Cambodia
    Which one is your favorite and why?
     
  2. Hunter0924

    Hunter0924 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Messages:
    715
    Location:
    North Carolina
    I prefer the Super .38 myself mainly because of the history. The Super really shines at the reloading bench and is a great round to experiment with.
    I have exchanged emails with John K. who developed the .40 S&W and he really knows his stuff.
     
  3. Hoppy590

    Hoppy590 Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,277
    Location:
    MA :(
    i like the 38 super because its a step up over the rounds at the time, while the .40SW is a step down from its big brother the 10mm
     
  4. Blarelli

    Blarelli Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    468
    Location:
    Az
    I really like the .40 because it brought more power into the small carry guns category, while the .38 super is too large to be put in a true sub-compact.
     
  5. asknight

    asknight Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Messages:
    1,298
    I choose the .40 simply for the fact that it's available in a wider variety of weapons. Nothing to do with the caliber of course, but not everyone is a 1911 fan, sadly.
     
  6. mavracer

    mavracer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,349
    Location:
    wichita
    .38 super because the .40 is an answer to a question I didn't ask.
     
  7. bannockburn

    bannockburn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    13,202
    Been a big fan of the Super 38 for many years; but they do require some extra work to get the most out of them. I've owned four 40's; they all worked just fine, but never seemed to get really decent accuracy out of any of them.
     
  8. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    45,671
    Location:
    Alabama
    .40 S&W. Just because I like it better, of those two anyway.
     
  9. spencerhut

    spencerhut Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Messages:
    517
    Location:
    ID
    Both

    We've got a pair of both and like them all. The .38 Super is a nice round to shoot loaded heavy, light, slow or fast. Brass is not common. Factory loads from the big boys are pretty weak so some fool does not blow up his .38 Auto with a .38 Super Auto load. So you've got to handload to have any fun with it.
    The .40S&W is as common as dirt. Seems like all the cops are shooting them I have guys at my club giving away .40 brass to me. This round can also be loaded heavy, light, slow or fast. But you can also buy tons of factory ammo for the .40S&W.
    I'm comfortable using either for any duty, target, run and gun, self defense or just turning money into smoke and noise.
     
  10. Conqueror

    Conqueror Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    966
    Location:
    RTP, NC
    Both penetrate 12" or more but .40 makes a bigger hole.

    <--- chooses .40.
     
  11. Autolycus

    Autolycus Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,456
    Location:
    In the land of make believe.
    I prefer .40 simply because it is common. I believe it is cheaper. And it works from all reports. THis is not saying .38 super is a bad round but I am a broke student and it isnt for me.
     
  12. gtmtnbiker98

    gtmtnbiker98 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    320
    I like the big-bore caliber in a compact size take for example the G27 and the MK40 - now that's a lot of firepower in the size of a j-frame.
     
  13. ccmdfd

    ccmdfd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2006
    Messages:
    154
    Location:
    Eastern Carolina
    I like them both, but I'd put the .38 Super ahead of the .40 in my own rankings.

    The Super really shines out of a 1911.

    The .40 is a nice caliber to have in a smaller, more concealable semi auto.
     
  14. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    I prefer the feel of the 38 super over the 40 cal...the hotter 38 supers are just fun to shoot.
     
  15. Kimber1911_06238

    Kimber1911_06238 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,548
    Location:
    AZ
    .38 super, because I love 1911's
     
  16. jaholder1971

    jaholder1971 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,302
    Location:
    thehighroad.us
    Accuracy: .38 Super. Headspacing a .38 Super on the case mouth slayed the dragon for accuracy. So far the accuracy dragon hasn't been found for the .40

    Popularity: .40, but the Super seems to have a resurgence building.

    Terminal effectiveness: .40, simply for bullet availability. Yes, the Super can be loaded to .357 Sig performance but you're pushing the envelope a bit.

    Which one for me: I'll take one of each, thank you very much!
     
  17. R.W.Dale

    R.W.Dale Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    11,359
    Location:
    Northwest Arkansas
    I feel a more important question is .357 sig vs .40 s&w.
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2007
  18. eldon519

    eldon519 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    2,449
    Location:
    Georgia
    I don't know what Voodoo they are using over in Finland, but Vihta Vuori has .38 Super data that leaves the .357 SIG in the dust. Published figures go up to about 1600 fps for a 124 gr. bullet from a 5.5" barrel. Hell the starting load for that powder is 1400 fps.
     
  19. R.W.Dale

    R.W.Dale Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    11,359
    Location:
    Northwest Arkansas
    I'd have to see that over a chronograph to believe it. 1600 fps in a .357 magnum with that weight bullet would be a pretty darn spicy load much less the smaller 38 super.
     
  20. eldon519

    eldon519 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    2,449
    Location:
    Georgia
    That's about what I was thinking. If it is feasible, I imagine it's a fully-supported-chamber-only type load.
     
  21. kd7nqb

    kd7nqb Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,207
    Location:
    Puyallup Washington
    I own a .40S&W, I dont own a .38super. So my favorite round is the one that fits my gun. But being that I have never fired a .38super I cant really comment on it. In hindsight I may have been better off without hitting the reply button.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page