- Joined
- Aug 29, 2008
- Messages
- 179
I know the normal arguments for 9 vs 40 vs 45, but if peoples choices would change if you remove the higher capacity out of the equation for the 9 and 40.
If you were limited to the same amount of rounds for each, how many of you would you always take the 45 or would the other factors such as cheaper to shoot still have you choosing the 9? Would there be any reason to bother with the 40, and if so why would you still choose it?
The amount of rounds is unimportant, but lets say for the sake of argument you were restricted to 5 rounds.
I'm curious what people's logic will be on this one.
I'd like to see your thought process rather than a response that just says "45!" You have 20 mins. Class, you may begin now!
If you were limited to the same amount of rounds for each, how many of you would you always take the 45 or would the other factors such as cheaper to shoot still have you choosing the 9? Would there be any reason to bother with the 40, and if so why would you still choose it?
The amount of rounds is unimportant, but lets say for the sake of argument you were restricted to 5 rounds.
I'm curious what people's logic will be on this one.
I'd like to see your thought process rather than a response that just says "45!" You have 20 mins. Class, you may begin now!