Cameras far north

Status
Not open for further replies.

LAK

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
2,487
So what has really happened to separation of church and State under the Bush administration; Federal money for conversion to the new State religion? We could call it the Homeland Temple of Surveillance ..........

-------------------------------------------
uspolitics.about.com
From Kathy Gill
Alaska Hamlet Gets 80 Surveillance Cameras From DHS, Which Now Has A Faith-Based Initiative

It's worthy of a Golden Fleece Award.

Dillingham, Alaska (map, population: 2,400) is installing 80 surveillance cameras, at the port and "around town," courtesy of a $202,000 Department of Homeland Security grant. The town is so small, it has no street lights. (tip)

Whereas Anchorage (map, population: 260,000) has fewer than 40 cameras for its port.

No blame should come to Police Chief Richard Thompson for applying for the grant. But hard questions should be directed to DHS's Chertoff, who has funneled $40 million into Alaska in the last three years. Alaska is second to Wyoming in per capita DHS monies, checking in at three times California. Reminds one of the bridge to nowhere.

About that faith-based initiative?

Homeland Security Watch reports that on Tuesday President Bush directed DHS to establish "a Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives ... to coordinate agency efforts to eliminate regulatory, contracting, and other programmatic obstacles to the participation of faith-based and other community organizations in the provision of social and community services... [and to] coordinate a comprehensive departmental effort to incorporate faith-based and other community organizations in Department programs and initiatives."

This includes conducting "a department-wide audit to identify all existing barriers to the participation of faith-based and other community organizations in the delivery of social and community services."

I don't see the connection with terrorism, the primary reason the President gave for creating DHS in 2002: "I ask the Congress to join me in creating a single permanent department with an overriding and urgent mission -- securing the American homeland and protecting the American people."

Did the Bush Administration not get the bi-partisan criticism directed at it post-Katrina? That Homeland Security and Emergency Management might not be the best bedfellows? That maybe the largest reorganization of the federal government since World War II has not gone smoothly?

For example, UPI reports on yet-another questionable Administration appointee: "a 28-year-old former White House staffer is heading a policy committee that gathers expert advice -- on behalf of the president and the Homeland Security secretary -- on key areas of homeland security, including threats to infrastructure and preventing terrorist attacks that use weapons of mass destruction."

He joins Julie Myers, Assistant Secretary for US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (36, Myers is the wife of DHS Chief Chertoff’s chief of staff and a niece of former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Richard B. Myers). President Bush bypassed Senate oversight of her nomination by making a recess appointment.

Makes you feel really safe re the DP World ports deal, now doesn't it?

http://uspolitics.about.com/b/a/207637.htm
---------------------------------------------------

http://ussliberty.org
http://ssunitedstates.org
 
Gun Related?

I'm not interested in starting a flame-out here, but how is this post of yours related to firearms? If i want to read or hear Bush-bashing or critics of the government, i have but to tune in to almost any news channel on TV, or read most of the left-leaning-liberal 'news' magazines that come out every week. I come here to escape all that.
 
Get informed on issues affecting the right to keep and bear arms and other civil rights. Coordinate activism, debate with allies and opponents. Discuss laws concerning firearm ownership, concealed carry and self-defense.
I'm not a mod, but I think this would classify as some form of civil rights...
I'm not sure, and could be wrong.
Point is, it doesn't have to be firearm related.
 
Well then, my mistake, and no offense intended to anyone in the first place, but i had thought the "legal & political" posts were supposed to be in reference to the 2A & the RKBA and so on? My bad...
 
While I don't see any connection between Faith-Based Initiatives and Homeland Security, so it just seems more like governmental "idiocy as usual" in a lot of modern-era doings.

Since the article speaks mostly to the apparent contradiction in the intent of these programs, I don't see relevance to THR's general run of subject material...

Art
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top