PedalBiker
Member
IF what Feinstein says about "assault rifles" is true then police don't need them.
If assault rifles are designed to "kill lots of people", why do police need to "kill lots of people"?
If assault rifles are not useful for self defense why do police need them at all?
If assault rifles are so powerful why would police use them in a school, let alone in the city anywhere?
If 30 round magazines are tools of "war" why do cops need them, it's not like we send them into combat?
In reality this school district realized the obvious:
1. Rifles are more accurate. Less misses means less chance of unintended casualties.
2. High velocity bullets are less ricochet prone and hence safer.
3. Fragmenting bullets are less likely to over penetrate and hence are safer.
4. A removable magazine is quicker, safer and easier to unload than a tubular magazine.
5. A removable magazine makes an unloaded weapon easier to quickly and safely load, eliminating the need to store weapons loaded.
5. A semi auto rifle will serve a wounded officer who may have only use of one arm.
6. A 223 cartridge is easy to manage due to light recoil which makes accurate shooting easier.
All of which proves that Feinstein wants more powerful, more dangerous weapons to be left out of "round one" of her legislation. And make no mistake this is just round one.
If it's small Feinstein hates it.
If it's cheap Feinstein hates it.
If it's powerful Feinstein hates it.
If it's accurate Feinstein hates it.
There are no guns Feinstein likes but the ones SHE has.
If assault rifles are designed to "kill lots of people", why do police need to "kill lots of people"?
If assault rifles are not useful for self defense why do police need them at all?
If assault rifles are so powerful why would police use them in a school, let alone in the city anywhere?
If 30 round magazines are tools of "war" why do cops need them, it's not like we send them into combat?
In reality this school district realized the obvious:
1. Rifles are more accurate. Less misses means less chance of unintended casualties.
2. High velocity bullets are less ricochet prone and hence safer.
3. Fragmenting bullets are less likely to over penetrate and hence are safer.
4. A removable magazine is quicker, safer and easier to unload than a tubular magazine.
5. A removable magazine makes an unloaded weapon easier to quickly and safely load, eliminating the need to store weapons loaded.
5. A semi auto rifle will serve a wounded officer who may have only use of one arm.
6. A 223 cartridge is easy to manage due to light recoil which makes accurate shooting easier.
All of which proves that Feinstein wants more powerful, more dangerous weapons to be left out of "round one" of her legislation. And make no mistake this is just round one.
If it's small Feinstein hates it.
If it's cheap Feinstein hates it.
If it's powerful Feinstein hates it.
If it's accurate Feinstein hates it.
There are no guns Feinstein likes but the ones SHE has.