For now, my one "manual of arms" is the simplest: just pull the trigger. I'm finding that switching back and forth between a Glock and a Kahr is more effortless than say a Glock, a P7M8, and a 1911.
I have a G36, which carries easily but for the most part I hate shooting. And on the other end of the spectrum, I have a PM9; carries like it's not there, but has a short barrel and grip -- giving up feel, site radius, and muzzle velocity. I'm thinking a K40 would split the difference, and maybe be just what I'm looking for. But before I go out and drop another fistfull of dollars on today's seemingly perfect compromise, I was wondering if anyone who owns or has fired these guns back-to-back, can share any insights.
How is the recoil and pointability of the K40 compared to the G36? I find the G36 feels like an unbalanced gun - the recoil is not proportional to the grip size. I'm not looking at an MK40 because I'd like to find a gun with a natural balance to it.
Thanks for the feedback -
I have a G36, which carries easily but for the most part I hate shooting. And on the other end of the spectrum, I have a PM9; carries like it's not there, but has a short barrel and grip -- giving up feel, site radius, and muzzle velocity. I'm thinking a K40 would split the difference, and maybe be just what I'm looking for. But before I go out and drop another fistfull of dollars on today's seemingly perfect compromise, I was wondering if anyone who owns or has fired these guns back-to-back, can share any insights.
How is the recoil and pointability of the K40 compared to the G36? I find the G36 feels like an unbalanced gun - the recoil is not proportional to the grip size. I'm not looking at an MK40 because I'd like to find a gun with a natural balance to it.
Thanks for the feedback -