Can Magnum P.I. Replace Moses?

Status
Not open for further replies.
How do you guys get that Selleck won his argument with Rosie? Basically all he said the entire time is "I'm not the NRA" nevermind that the only reason the issue came up is because he did an ad 8 months prior that said "I am the NRA". Not only that but he later admits that he hadn't been a member of the NRA since childhood and had to rejoin so he could do the ad. He even admits that he doesn't "hang out with people of the NRA... ".

I will admit that he made points with his reference to violence being a cultural issue, but when Rosie retorted with "guns are at least partly to blame", he just let it stand. Even worse she spouted madeup statistics and sensationalism about assault weapons and he pulled his "I'm not the NRA" bit again. He did the same thing when they discussed the original intent of the constitution and Rosie ended by stating that POSSESSING an assault rifle was equivalent to shouting "Fire" in a crowded movie theatre, and he AGREED WITH HER!

I understand that he was under stress and in a hostile environment, but he was prepped and told that the issue may come up (like they do for all interviews) and he was well aware of Rosie's irrational beliefs. If he wasn't willing to defend his position, he just had to say that he didn't want to talk about that during prep and it would have died. Instead, he got up there and refused to answer questions, confirmed outright fabrications, and generally went along with Rosie's manipulation of the facts to suit her beliefs. These are not the actions of the president of the NRA.

I know that most RKBA people look at the video or read the transcript and see Selleck as winning primarily because he remains calm in the face of outright lies and distortions (and I will give him credit for that) while Rosie gets increasingly shrill, but the RKBA members are not the target audience of Rosie's show. The target audience is the enemy of the RKBA, the soccer moms and they expect and welcome Rosie's behavior. In addition, The soccer moms have no clue that Rosie's facts (which she had spouted frequently) were complete lies and distortions, and since the soccer moms watch Rosie fervently she inherently had more credibility than did Selleck. In this situation he needs to disagree totally, not attempt to correct misperceptions. As the credible host, Rosie's statements are already accepted as facts and any attempt by Selleck to correct a misperception is seen as an attempt to spin the facts not provide accurate information.

With this in mind, there is no way that Selleck effectively communicated or defended our position during this interview. It could possibly be concluded that the argument was a draw since Rosie was the one that closed the argument, but Selleck's body language is the language of an uncomfortable and defeated man not someone who is comfortable and confident in his beliefs and positions.

If Selleck is willing to truely live his "I am the NRA", then I think he can be a charismatic and particularly effect spokesperson. But, I don't think that he's willing to accept becoming an outcast in Hollywood and alienating his primary fanbase which is the soccer moms, but adopting and defending the positions and beliefs of the NRA.


By the way, the above should in no way be taken as an endorsement of Nugent. I love Nugent, but I sincerely doubt that he wants to be the head of the NRA even if he were offered the job. The NRA and Nugent are two sides of the same coin but only one side of a coin can up at a time.

Of course if the NRA wanted to create a "spirit of the NRA incarnate" position, I think Nugent would be elected to a lifetime position.
 
XD,
I both agree and disagree with you. You are correct that there is no way we can change the minds of the anti's just like there is no way that they could change ours. BUT,[rant on] here's the real deal. My best guess would be that roughly 10 percent of Americans fall into the "Anti" group. And about 10 percent fall into the active RKBA group. It's that 80 percent that aint really sure what to think that we need to be concerned with, and although I repect Ted's views and out spoken attitude, I also know that to win the hearts and minds of that 80 percent of confused folks we need a more refined approach. I think Tom could serve in that role very well but that is entirely up to him and I don't recall ever seeing anything to indicate that either of the two had been asked or were considering the posistion. More importantly though, is the action that each of us takes. We ALL need to be active in the fight. Call and write your congressman and representatives. Get friends to join the NRA, even the ones that don't shoot every weekend or may not even own a gun yet. Get active with a local 4-H shooting team or a Scouting groups shooting program. There are literally thousands of ways to get involved and make a difference but the key is to DO it, not just talk about it. We can put whatever face we want on the president of the NRA and it won't change a thing unless we all get off our collective butts and help the NRA help us! [/rant off]

I don't agree with your numbers, but your theory is solid. Solid, yet flawed.

You want to win over that 80%, yet your enemy is using unfair tactics. They are lying, spreading FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) with their lies, and bending the media to their will. Your goody two shoes approach is looking like a 6 year old saying "No I'm not...", over and over again.

We aren't going to win the war against the antis until we start to turn up the heat and start playing their game against them. Because in the end, it's nothing more than politics. It's who can throw the most dirt the furthest.

Look at the way the two underlined handles themselves in an anti-gun controlled interview.

Tom Selleck basically did, on Rosie, what I said above. He sat there like a 6 year old kid and said "No I'm not...nuh-uh...". But there are dozens of interviews with Ted in this same nature and what does Ted do? He takes their rhetoric, sharpens it, turns it around, and jams it up their backside.

He wins while Selleck looks like a fool.

Now who's going to win that 80% worth having? The ones that will really support you.
 
Ted may turn it around but the antis and most people wont give him credibility due to his past and his actions. He presents himself badly and off comes off as an idiot gun nut. He doesnt help our cause even when he is right because they say look at the moron Mr. Nugent even when he is right because he comes off like an ass.
 
Then the answer is clear.

How do we rig it so Selleck can "channel" Nugent? :D

Sawdust
 
About Tom

He played a bit part in 1971 with, of all people, Mae West. He played "bachelor number three" on the Dating Game.

She asked him how tall he was. He is six feet four inches, but his prepared line was "six feet seven inches". She replied " let's forget the six feet and talk about the seven inches".

He got over that. He would make a good president of anything where being a moral person is important.
 
The "genius" of Rosie O'Donnell

Tom: They are for trigger locks. The NRA is for a lot of things as long as they’re voluntary.

Rosie: They’re against the registering of guns. We have to register cars. Why shouldn’t we register guns so that when a crime is committed we can trace who has owned it?

Rosie: But you can’t say that guns don’t bear a responsibility. If the makers of the TEC-9 assault rifle... Why wouldn’t the NRA be against assault rifles? This is a gun that can shoot five bullets in a second. This is the gun that those boys brought into the school. Why the NRA wouldn’t say as a matter of compromise, “we agree, assault weapons are not good”?

Rosie: I think the Second Amendment is in the Constitution so that we can have muskets when the British people come over in 1800. I don’t think it’s in the Constitution to have assault weapons in the year 2000.

Rosie: Assault weapons threaten the safety of other people. There’s no reason, in my opinion, to have them. You want to have a hunting rifle? Great! You want to have a handgun? (She holds her hand up and nods her head as if to say, “great”.)

"Guns (INANIMATE OBJECTS) bear a responsibility" - NOT criminal thugs who unlawfully abuse them.

"Assault weapons (INANIMATE OBJECTS) threaten the safety of other people" - NOT criminal thugs who unlawfully abuse them.

"The Second Amendment applies only to muskets."


What a myopic, leftist/socialist idiot...:barf:
 
I think he puts a FRIENDLY face on the NRA... Nugent doesn't... He's the guy that urban/burban kids "survive." I think the NRA needs him, but not as the head spokesperson.

Now for the persistent rumor? Selleck gay or not? Either way, he has my vote. And if he's gay, is the media gonna hardcore out him and rake him over the coals for it? I don't think so... I think it'd actually be a benefit...
 
progunner, remember that is the same rosie that said

:confused: "You are not allowed to own a gun, and if you do own a gun, I think you should go to prison."

:scrutiny: And then 9 months later was revealed to have been sending an armed bodyguard into school to watch her child.

:rolleyes: And then tried to reconcile this profound hypocrisy by claiming that "she doesnt pesonally own any guns."

Her head is full of rocks. How can hiring henchmen with guns somehow be less bad than personally owning the guns? If you send the henchmen with a gun into school, how is that any less bad than taking the gun to school yourself? Why would someone who hates guns even hire a henchman with a gun? Like I said, head full of rocks.
 
Gay? Who cares. I'm not sleeping with him. My wife isn't sleeping with him. So it's really none of my business who is sleeping with him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top