Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.
I'm seeing cheap ($300-$500) G3, Cetme, and FAL clones in the shotgun news, says that they use original recievers and then american parts made by Century Arms. Yay or Nay?
i shot a Cetme at the range this past week. Seemed well made and shot fine. No problems. Checked out one at a shop here and it was nice too. They are a great way to get a semi auto G3 type rifle. Unless you have $2000 or more for an HK 91. I know I dont.
Century has a reputation of being an iffy proposition. After much research, I decided to go with a Cetme. The L1A1 may have a mix of inch and metric parts and the G3 was slightly out of my price range. Look here
I've checked out both and for the money the CETME is a great buy. The only concern I would have would be the long term availability of spare parts and configurations available.
With the FAL you have parts that are readily available and have the bonus of an adjustable gas system. You can just about make it work with any ammo available out there.
So, if you want one to keep stock, the CETME will be a great choice. The FAL is a better choice if you are going to put thousands of rounds downrange and like to have the option of someday changing your rifle configuration such as going to an 18" barrel and different type stocks.
I've been more impressed by the FALs coming out by Century than the CETMEs. They just haven't learned to do a good weld yet for some reason on the CETME. Functionalls perfectly ok, but cosmetically crappy.
Just a couple of nits. The CETME and G3's are original HK / CETME parts kits, but the receivers are US made, as are 9 other parts (usually the sear, stocks and a few other parts). The receivers are either made by Century, SW, FMP or a couple of other manf that I can't remember right now. They are either stamped sheet metal or cast stainless. Look in the references shown above for the differences. I would expect the L1A1s are the same set up.
Agree with above that Century can be spotty from a quality standpoint. I just bought a G3 after deciding against the CETME. CETMEs are quite cheap right now ($299) but it appears that Century may be reaching the end of the parts sources as some of the condition of parts and the method of setting headspace measurement is beyond what you would want with a rifle with better condition parts.
I decided on the G3 since I thought the extra $100 or so wass worth better condition parts and a larger parts supply, including new HK parts. I don't have many rounds through it yet but it appears to be reliable and accurate...plus it gets LOTS of attention at the range.
I have a FAL and couldn't be happier with it. It's plenty accurate and has been 100% reliable. I can vouch that Century mixed and matched metric and inch parts together, but that doesn't seem to have affected it in any adverse way.
I highly dislike CAI's iffy reputation. That said, I know of a flawless running FAL someone else had and I myself did the unthinkable, I bought a CAI Garand! I'm aware of the inferiority of the cast reciever, but I looked the gun over pretty good, headspace was good and fired brass looks fine. Only 4 bandoleers into it, but it functions 100% and will do fine in the role of truck/trunk gun and tide me over until the CMP Garand(s) show up. If you buy a Century, have it checked out by a gunsmith, know you are buying from a company with a checkered past but improving quality and judge the weapon by its performance.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.