Chart on different calibers and their stopping power

Status
Not open for further replies.

gym

member
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
5,901
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.32 ACP
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Win Silvertip JHP 60 970 125 83 63%
Win N/A FMJ 71 905 129 123 50%
Magsafe Defender JPF 50 1250 174 57% *
Glaser Safety Slug JPF 50 1065 126 46% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.380 ACP (9mmK)
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Cor-Bon N/A +P JHP 90 1050 220 20 70%
Federal Hydra-Shok JHP 90 1000 200 58 69%
Federal N/A JHP 90 1000 200 109 69%
Win Silvertip JHP 85 1000 189 82 61%
CCI N/A JHP 88 1000 196 57 58%
Rem N/A (old ver) JHP 88 990 192 51 57%
Hornady XTP JHP 90 1000 200 26 54%
Federal N/A FMJ 95 955 193 109 51%
Magsafe Maximum +P+ JPF 52 1720 342 81%*
Glaser Blue JPF 70 1350 283 75% *
Glaser Silver JPF 70 1295 261 73% *
Magsafe Defender JPF 60 1340 239 71% *
Magsafe Fast Hardball JPF 55 1500 275 71% *
CCI Gold Dot JPF 90 1030 212 67% *
Triton N/A +P JHP 90 1000 200 65% *
Rem Golden Saber JHP 102 925 194 64% *
Rem N/A (new ver) JHP 88 990 192 64% *
Eld Starfire JHP 95 925 181 62% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.38 special 2"
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Win N/A +P LHP 158 789 219 106 67%
Federal N/A +P LHP 158 783 215 111 66%
Federal N/A +P JHP 125 819 186 103 65%
Rem N/A +P LHP 158 781 214 81 65%
CCI N/A +P JHP 125 822 187 53 64%
Federal Nyclad +P JHP 125 878 214 29 62%
Win N/A +P JHP 125 816 185 63 62%
Rem N/A +P SJHP 95 1023 221 118 60%
Rem N/A +P SJHP 125 845 198 91 52%
Win N/A +P JHP 110 924 209 91 51%
Federal N/A SWC 158 652 149 167 49%
Federal N/A LRN 158 599 126 319 49%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.38 special 4"
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Cor-Bon N/A +P+ JHP 115 1250 399 29 83%
Win N/A +P LHP 158 890 278 302 78%
Federal N/A +P LHP 158 890 278 209 77%
Federal N/A +P JHP 125 945 248 214 73%
Rem N/A +P SJHP 125 945 248 106 73%
Win N/A +P+ JHP 110 1155 326 35 71%
CCI N/A +P JHP 125 945 248 74 70%
Rem N/A +P LHP 158 890 278 143 70%
Win Silvertip +P JHP 110 995 242 111 69%
Rem N/A +P SJHP 95 1175 291 119 66%
Win N/A +P JHP 125 945 248 65 65%
Federal N/A SWC 158 755 200 278 52%
Federal N/A LRN 158 755 200 456 51%
Magsafe Maximum JPF 65 1800 468 87% *
Glaser Blue +P JPF 80 1500 400 85% *
Magsafe Fast Hrdball+P JPF 49 1820 361 80% *
Glaser Blue JPF 80 1350 324 80% *
Triton N/A +P+ JHP 110 1230 370 79% *
Rem Golden Sabre JHP 125 975 264 73% *
Triton N/A +P+ JHP 158 925 300 73% *
Eld Starfire JHP 125 950 251 73% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9mm
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Cor-Bon N/A JHP 115 1350 466 32 91%
Federal N/A +P+ JHP 115 1300 432 109 90%
Win N/A +P+ JHP 115 1305 435 98 90%
Rem N/A +P+ JHP 115 1310 439 57 89%
Federal Hydra-Shok +P+ JHP 124 1220 410 63 86%
Federal Nyclad LHP 124 1120 346 239 84%
Win Silvertip JHP 115 1225 383 304 83%
Federal N/A JHP 115 1160 344 208 82%
Rem N/A JHP 115 1155 341 167 81%
Federal Hydra-Shok JHP 124 1120 346 106 81%
CCI N/A JHP 115 1155 341 135 79%
Federal Hydra-Shok JHP 147 1000 327 278 78%
Federal 9MS-2 JHP 147 975 310 27 78%
Win Black Talon JHP 147 990 320 26 77%
Federal 9MS-1 JHP 147 975 310 25 76%
Win N/A JHP 147 990 320 232 74%
Hornady N/A JHP 90 1360 370 25 64%
Win N/A FMJ 115 1153 341 256 63%
Sig Rhino JPF 98 1650 593 91% *
Magsafe Stealth +P JPF 64 1950 541 90% *
Glaser Blue JPF 80 1650 484 88% *
BlkHls N/A JHP 115 1300 432 85% *
Rem N/A +P JHP 115 1250 399 84% *
Triton XTP +P JHP 124 1250 431 84% *
Cor-Bon N/A +P BHP 124 1250 421 84% *
Cor-Bon XTP JHP 125 1250 434 83% *
Rem Golden Sabre +P JHP 124 1180 384 83% *
GA Arms N/A +P PHP 115 1275 415 83% *
GA Arms N/A +P PHP 124 1225 413 83% *
AA ADE JHP 115 1220 380 82% *
CCI Gold Dot JHP 124 1150 364 82% *
Eld Starfire JHP 115 1167 348 81% *
Rem Golden Sabre JHP 124 1125 349 81% *
Eld Starfire JHP 124 1090 327 80% *
Cor-Bon XTP JHP 147 1100 395 80% *
CCI Gold Dot JHP 115 1200 368 79% *
Magsafe Fast Hardball JPF 60 1920 341 79% *
Win Supreme SXT JHP 147 990 320 78% *
Rem Golden Sabre JHP 147 990 320 77% *
CCI Gold Dot JHP 147 985 317 77% *
Rem N/A JHP 124 1070 315 77% *
Cor-Bon N/A +P BHP 147 1000 327 77% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.357 Sig.
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Magsafe Defedner N/A JPF 64 2230 707 92% *
Cor-Bon Sierra JHP 115 1450 537 89% *
Federal N/A JHP 125 1352 507 88% *
Hornady XTP JHP 124 1350 502 87% *
CCI Gold Dot JHP 125 1398 543 86% *
Cor-Bon N/A BHP 124 1400 540 86% *
Hornady XTP JHP 147 1190 460 84% *
Federal N/A FMJ 125 1352 507 59% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.357 Magnum
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Rem N/A JHP 125 1450 584 204 96%
Federal N/A JHP 125 1450 584 523 96%
CCI N/A JHP 125 1450 584 153 93%
Federa N/A JHP 110 1295 410 204 90%
Rem N/A SJHP 110 1295 410 53 89%
Win N/A JHP 125 1450 584 105 87%
Win Silvertip JHP 145 1290 536 84 85%
Rem Med. Vel. JHP 125 1220 413 23 83%
Rem N/A SJHP 158 1235 535 38 82%
Federal Nyclad LHP 158 1235 535 42 81%
CCI N/A JHP 140 1380 592 23 74%
Win N/A SWC 158 1255 553 98 72%
Rem N/A SWC 158 1235 535 71 68%
Rem N/A JSP 158 1235 535 73% *
CCI N/A JSP 158 1178 487 72% *
CCI N/A JHP 125 1410 552 71% *
Federal N/A SWC 158 1152 466 71% *
CCI N/A JHP 158 1240 540 70% *
Glaser Blue JPF 80 1700 514 89% *
Eld Starfire JHP 150 1205 484 88% *
Rem Med. Vel. SJHP 110 1295 410 85% *
Magsafe Fast Hardball JPF 49 1960 418 85% *
Cor-Bon XTP JHP 125 1450 584 85% *
Rem Golden Sabre JHP 125 1220 413 84% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.40 S&W
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Cor-Bon Nosler JHP 135 1300 507 24 96%
Federal N/A JHP 155 1140 448 34 94%
Rem Golden Sabre JHP 165 1150 485 16 94%
Federal Hydra-Shok JHP 155 1140 448 14 93%
Cor-Bon N/A JHP 150 1200 480 26 92%
Win Silvertip JHP 155 1205 500 22 91%
Federal Hydra-Shok JHP 180 950 361 38 89%
Cor-Bon N/A +P JHP 180 1050 441 22 86%
BlkHls XTP JHP 180 950 361 46 85%
Eld Starfire JHP 180 985 388 18 83%
Win N/A JHP 180 1010 408 21 81%
Win Black Talon JHP 180 990 392 35 80%
Win N/A FMJ 180 950 361 17 71%
Cor-Bon N/A +P JHP 135 1325 526 94% *
Glaser Blue JPF 105 1500 525 91% *
Magsafe Defender +P+ JPF 84 1753 573 93% *
Cor-Bon Sierra JHP 135 1300 507 90% *
Magsafe Fast Hardball JPF 67 1870 521 90% *
GA Arms N/A +P PHP 155 1200 496 90% *
CCI Gold Dot JHP 155 1186 484 89% *
Eld Starfire JHP 155 1160 463 89% *
Hornady XTP JHP 155 1180 480 88% *
Cor-Bon XTP JHP 155 1175 475 88% *
Cor-Bon N/A JHP 165 1125 464 88% *
ProLoad N/A JHP 150 1190 472 88% *
GA Arms N/A +P PHP 180 1050 441 88% *
Triton N/A JHP 165 1125 464 87% *
Rem Golden Sabre JHP 180 1015 412 87% *
Win Supreme SXT JHP 180 990 392 86% *
Rem N/A JHP 155 1140 448 85% *
ProLoad Hi Perf. JHP 180 1070 458 85% *
Master N/A JHP 150 1100 403 85% *
CCI Gold Dot JHP 180 958 367 85% *
AA ADE JHP 180 990 392 84% *
Hornady XTP JHP 180 950 361 82% *
Federal Hydra-Shok JHP 165 950 331 82% *
ProLoad N/A JHP 180 950 361 82% *
Federal N/A JHP 180 950 361 81% *
Win Black Talon JHP 180 1015 412 80% *
Rem N/A JHP 180 950 361 80% *
Master N/A PHP 180 950 361 80% *
Win N/A FMJ 155 1125 436 79% *
Federal N/A SWC 180 925 361 73% *
Master N/A SWC 170 925 323 73% *
CCI N/A TMJ 180 950 361 70% *
Barber Power JFP 180 950 361 70% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10mm Medum Vel
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Win N/A JHP 180 1055 445 44 82%
Federal N/A JHP 180 980 384 27 81%
Rem N/A JHP 180 1055 445 31 81%
Win Black Talon JHP 200 990 436 87% *
Federal Hydra-Shok JHP 180 1030 424 87% *
Eld Starfire JHP 180 950 361 84% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10mm
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Cor-Bon N/A JHP 150 1300 563 10 90%
Glaser Blue JPF 105 1650 635 92% *
Win Silvertip JHP 175 1290 647 92% *
Master N/A JHP 150 1334 593 91% *
Triton N/A JHP 135 1400 588 91% *
Magsafe Defender JPF 96 1780 676 91% *
Rem N/A JHP 170 1262 602 88% *
Norma N/A FMJ 200 1181 620 69% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
41 Magnum
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Win Silvertip JHP 175 1250 608 53 89%
Win N/A JHP 210 1300 789 34 82%
Rem N/A JSP 210 1300 789 31 81%
Win N/A SWC 210 965 435 57 75%
Rem N/A SWC 210 965 435 43 74%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
44 Special
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Win Silvertip JHP 200 810 292 60 75%
Federal N/A LHP 200 810 292 49 73%
Win N/A LRN 246 755 312 71 65%
Rem N/A SWC 200 1035 476 17 65%
Rem N/A SWC 240 851 386 65% *
Magsafe Defender JPF 92 1620 536 92% *
Magsafe Urban Defender JPF 115 1300 432 89% *
D&D Omega Star JPF 210 965 434 88% *
Cor-Bon XTP JHP 180 1000 400 86% *
CCI Gold Dot JHP 200 875 340 84% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
44 Magnum
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Win Silvertip JHP 210 1250 729 50 90%
Federal N/A JHP 180 1610 1037 37 89%
Rem N/A SJHP 240 1180 743 34 88%
Win N/A JHP 240 1180 743 43 84%
Federal N/A JHP 240 1180 743 35 80%
Rem Med. Vel. SWC 240 850 385 55 76%
Magsafe Urban Defender JPF 115 1620 671 93% *
D&D Omega Star JPF 210 1250 729 93% *
Eld Starfire JHP 240 1180 743 91% *
CCI N/A JHP 200 1200 640 90% *
Cor-Bon XTP JHP 180 1200 576 90% *
Federal Hydra-Shok JHP 240 1180 743 86% *
Win N/A SWC 240 1259 845 82% *
CCI Med. Vel. SWC 240 850 385 65% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.45 ACP
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Federal Hydra-Shok JHP 230 850 369 71 94%
Rem Golden Sabre JHP 230 875 391 14 93%
Cor-Bon N/A JHP 185 1150 544 12 92%
Rem N/A +P JHP 185 1140 534 44 91%
CCI Lawman JHP 200 975 422 111 88%
Federal N/A JHP 185 950 371 75 87%
Win Silvertip JHP 185 1000 411 73 82%
Rem N/A JHP 185 1000 411 114 81%
Win Black Talon JHP 230 900 414 36 81%
Rem N/A FMJ 230 835 356 122 65%
Federal N/A FMJ 230 835 356 168 63%
Win N/A FMJ 230 835 356 179 63%
Sig Rhino JPF 125 1560 676 93% *
Magsafe Maximum JPF 103 1900 826 93% *
Magsafe Swat JPF 66 2140 672 >93% *
Glaser Blue JPF 140 1400 610 93% *
Magsafe Defender JPF 96 1660 588 93% *
Triton N/A +P JHP 185 1150 544 92% *
Magsafe Fast Hardball JPF 72 2120 719 92% *
Federal Hydra-Shok +P JHP 185 1140 534 91% *
D&D Omega Star JPF 200 1020 462 91% *
D&D Omega Star +P JPF 230 960 471 90% *
Cor-Bon N/A +P JHP 230 950 461 90% *
GA Arms N/A +P PHP 185 1075 475 90% *
CCI Gold Dot JHP 185 1050 453 90% *
AA ADE JHP 185 1000 411 89% *
D&D Omega Star JPF 200 965 414 89% *
Cor-Bon N/A +P BHP 230 950 461 89% *
Rem Golden Sabre JHP 185 1015 423 89% *
Hornady XTP +P JHP 230 950 461 89% *
Hornady XTP +P JHP 200 1050 490 88% *
Cor-Bon N/A JHP 200 1050 490 88% *
Win Subsonic JHP 230 925 437 88% *
D&D Omega Star JPF 230 885 400 87% *
Eld Starfire JHP 230 850 369 86% *
Win Supreme SXT JHP 230 860 378 86% *
CCI Gold Dot BHP 230 830 352 86% *
IMI UZI FMJ 185 1046 450 77% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.45 Long Colt
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Federal N/A LHP 225 900 405 69 78%
Win Silvertip JHP 225 920 423 53 74%
Win N/A LRN 255 860 419 59 69%
Rem N/A LRN 250 860 411 19 63%
CCI N/A JHP 200 850 321 85% *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.223 Rem [Rifle]
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Rem N/A JHP 60 3100 1281 11 100%
Win Match JHP-BT 69 3060 1435 12 100%
Federal N/A JHP 40 3650 1184 125 99%
Win N/A JSP 55 3240 1282 25 96%
Win N/A FMJ 55 3240 1282 161 96%
Federal N/A JHP 55 3240 1282 90 95%
Rem N/A FMJ 55 3240 1282 37 95%
Federal N/A JHP 62 3020 1296 32 94%
Rem N/A JSP 55 3240 1282 17 94%
Federal N/A FMJ-BT 55 3240 1282 82 93%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.308 Win. [Rifle]
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Rem Sierra Match JHP-BT 168 2680 2680 19 100%
Mil Sierra Match JHP-BT 168 2680 2680 199 99%
Federal Sierra Match JHP-BT 168 2600 2520 73 99%
IMI Sierra Match JHP-BT 168 2680 2680 306 98%
Win Sierra Match JHP-BT 168 2680 2680 34 97%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 Gauge
Manu. Brand Type Grains fps fpe Shoot. Success
Federal 2 3/4" Slug 438 1600 2490 78 98%
Rem 2 3/4" Slug 438 1600 2490 99 98%
Win 2 3/4" Slug 438 1600 2490 119 98%
Federal 2 3/4" Tactical 00 Buck 486 1145 1415 89 96%
Rem 3" Magnum 00 Buck 675 1210 2195 34 94%
Win 2 3/4" 00 Buck 540 1325 2106 293 94%
Federal 2 3/4" 00 Buck 540 1325 2106 235 89%
Rem 2 3/4" 00 Buck 540 1325 2106 419 88%
Win 2 3/4" #4 Buck 540 1325 2106 95 83%
Rem 2 3/4" #4 Buck 540 1325 2106 223 81%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Abbreviated manufacturer's names:
- Rem = Remington
- Win = Winchester
- Eld = Eldorado
- Sig = Signature
- BlkHls = Black Hills
- GA Arms = Georgia Arms
- AA = American Ammo
- D&D = D&D Bullets

Information Sources
All figures listed under the Marshall & Sanow's Latest Ratings are sourced from the references listed below. Because the database of actual shootings, and the number of new ammunition & bullets being released is continually increasing, a situation occurs where different sources list conflicting figures for the same calibre/load combination. When this occurs, I have used the figures from the most recently dated publication. Many thanks to the following publications, people, and organisations for the actual figures, and much of the information about handgun stopping power provided by this site:

- FBI Wound Ballistic Evaluation
- Federal Cartridges (Product info and brochures)
- Guns & Ammo Magazine (September 1992)
- Guns & Ammo Magazine (October 1992)
- Guns & Ammo 1994 Annual for the Strasbourg Test Information
- Handguns Magazine (February 1995)
- Handguns Magazine (December 1995)
- Hornady 1995 Catalog (Pictures)
- Handgun Stopping Power (Marshalll & Sanow) for most of the figures and background information
- Larry Ellision for pointing out errors, for constructive criticism, and useful suggestions.
- Magsafe Ammo Company (Product info and brochures)
- Marshalll & Sanow for all their fantastic work, and regular updates
- Rick Dixon (D&D Omega Star Bullets) for figures, photo's, bullets and other interesting information
- Street Stoppers (also by Marshall & Sanow)
- Criteria for Determining a Bullets Stopping Power
- [Marshall and Sanow, pages 43-45]
The bullet must strike the torso (excluding the head and neck) of a person. It seems obvious that a bullet that strikes a hand, leg, arm or foot, will almost certainly never bring about instantaneous incapacitation. Secondly, a successful one-shot stop occurring in the neck or head owes its success to shot placement, rather than calibre or bullet design.

Multiple hits have to be discarded. We are interested in the effect of a single bullet. Again it is obvious that multiple shots will be more effective, however it is impossible to determine some measure of bullet performance based on multiple shots.

Figures are provided (by Marshall & Sanow) only when a minimum of five instances of shooting with a particular load/calibre combination have occurred. In addition, some of the following information must have been available: police reports, evidence technician reports, homicide reports, autopsy results, and photos (among other things). In addition, the actual recovered bullets or photographs of the bullets must have been available for examination.

Marshall & Sanow have developed a method of estimating a bullets performance based on correlating the results of the performance of new bullets fired into 10% ballistic gelatine with the results of bullets with known performance on the street, also fired into 10% ballistic gelatine. (Read the book - you'll find out that their method of estimating is the most thorough and likely to represent reality as you could possible get). All figures that are estimated are marked with a "*". Reality shows that frequently the estimated figure turns out to be a little below the actual figure when it becomes available.

Validity of the Bullet Effectiveness Estimation Theory
[Marshall and Sanow, pages 187-196]
Marshall and Sanow make use of four areas of a bullets performance in 10% ballistic gelatine to predict a bullets effectiveness. In each case the bullets known performance on the street is compared to the performance in the ballistic gelatine. The results allow a new bullets street effectiveness to be estimated based on its performance in ballistic gelatine. The correlation coefficients for each area of bullet performance in ballistic gelatine with actual street results are:

Penetration. The correlation coefficient for penetration is -0.37
Recovered bullet diameter. The correlation coefficient is 0.82 for bullets under 1300 fps, and 0.68 for bullets over 1300 fps.
Permanent crush cavity volume. The correlation coefficient is 0.87 for bullets under 1300 fps, and 0.60 for bullets over 1300 fps.
Temporary crush cavity volume. The correlation coefficient is 0.80.
Of course, the closer each correlation coefficient is to 1.0, the more accurate the prediction. In practise, Marshall and Sanow's method has shown itself to be very accurate, and has become the standard by which many bullet manufacturers and knowledgeable publications compare and estimate new bullets performance.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All rights reseved by Marshall and Sanow.
http://www.familyfriendsfirearms.com/Stopping Power Statistics.htm
 
Lots of those loads aren't being made anymore, and there are new ones out that work better and have the advantage of a few decades of JHP development, deign, and use to build off of.

Neat to have all that ballistic data in one place though.
 
M&S study has been beat to death, and you get into caliber wars, questions of methodology but to really sum it up, and I believe that it is even in the full study somewhere, it comes to shot placement and training, so just packing the x or whatever caliber that is listed by them as "best man-stopper" never mind that bullet design has drastically changed in the 20+ years since this came out, doesn't guarantee a damn thing.

So to sum it up
Practice, practice, and practice,
OH and get some quality training, whether from a big name or just some "guy" at the local range, go and learn, because it will and does make all the difference.
 
It's just a chart, some may find it useful. It's not a debate, or question, just a chart that may be of interest to some, no need to make it into something it's not. We have many new shooters that may be interested in basic stats. Some don't even know some of these calibers exist, it's information not a recommendation on anything.
 
It's just not complete. You don't have barrel length on most of the calibers.

Also, HANDGUNS DON'T HAVE STOPPING POWER! :cuss:
 
Interesting to see that some of the rifle rounds received 100% effectiveness ratings. I assume that is 100% in the small pool of cases reviewed with that ammo. It would be hard to believe that any small arms ammo could produce 100% effectiveness all of the time.

Thanks for posting.
 
M&S study has been beat to death

I agree...and actually had kind of forgotten about it. It's always interesting to revisit and I'm sure folks who haven't seen it may appreciate the post.

It's based on actual shootings, not under laboratory conditions.
and
Now all we need to accompany that chart are the questionnaires from which these statistics are derived from. You do have those, don't you?

Are good observations and, if I recall correctly, the true "issues" with the findings. They aren't scientific. There is no true statistical data. The information was compiled on actual events with so many variables it would make your head spin, so the information derived has to be taken with a grain of salt.

Even if we argue for Active Research it still won't hold water.

I don't mean to start a debate - we did that dance when the "study" first came out - just wanted to shed some light on the validity.

Thanks again,
DFW1911
 
Now all we need to accompany that chart are the questionnaires from which these statistics are derived from. You do have those, don't you?

The only way to run a classical experimental design to prove cause and effect would be to randomly select people and shoot them with the different calibers and different barrel lengths. Then we could actually “prove” which calibers and barrel lengths had the best “stoping power”. Until then, this is the best we have.
 
Not this crap again.

The M&S study only included instances where a person was shot a single time. If someone was shot once and fell over or ran away or whatever, it counts as a "stop." If shot only once, and they kept attacking, it counts as a "failure to stop."

Shot twice and fell over dead, not counted. Shot twice and kept going, not counted. The problems with this sort of methodology are numerous and obvious. For one thing, it skews the percents way higher than they should be, because the main two reasons for only shooting someone once are either the first shot stopped them, or because you're such a terrible shot that only one hit.

Then there are also a bunch of other factors that will have nothing to do with the ammo itself. If you took all the people in the world that own 9mms, and had the ones who CCW with Speer Gold Dot compete against the ones who CCW with cheapo Winchester white box JHPs, who would probably shoot more accurately? Would that accuracy have anything to do with the ammo? Shot placement is key, and people who get "premium" ammo, just on average, practice more than people who get the cheap stuff. On average, it's not going to apply to everyone, because I just know someone's going to say something about that.

The practice difference will apply across calibers, too. In reality, 9mm FMJ makes the exact same size hole as .380 FMJ. Yet 9mm FMJ has a higher "one shot stop" percentage. Why? Because on average, people who carry a "service caliber" practice more than those who carry a "minor" caliber. There's also ergonomics and other factors, too. A 9mm is more likely to be a full size or semi-compact pistol, a .380 is more likely to be a harder-to-shoot-accurately pocket gun.

End result: you can't tell squat from the M&S "one shot stop" data. Trying to draw conclusions from it is going to be an exercise in futility.
 
I'm skeptical a lot of the information presented, but it's fun to go over it. Not worth copying and saving for me.
 
I thought that the info was made available, but most of it was from police reports and autopsy reports, it's interesting, but unfortunately the repeatability is not there, add to this the baltisticians reliance on gel, and you have a wonderful time, personally this is a topic best avoided, or discussed over a few beers with copious body armor.

If you look at what is available and what works, I think that gel can give you an idea of what HP expands well, but still it's lacking, I would like to see somebody repeat the army wounding dynamics, but how many pig farmers will let you shoot up their herd
 
Wait Georgia Arms? That seems a LOT newer than the last M&S study I saw, what is going on here?
 
"...Also, HANDGUNS DON'T HAVE STOPPING POWER..." Shut off your caps lock. In any case, handgun cartridges don't have reliable stopping power and either does a rifle. Far too many variables.
 
Gotta admit though, I do like going over the "data", it's interesting, and the anecdotes they include are pretty interesting as well. Often pretty sad, especially the failures, but still worth a read.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top