Christensen Ranger first blush review.

Status
Not open for further replies.

LoonWulf

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2010
Messages
18,012
Location
Hawaii
I just picked this up today, but we had it out over the weekend.

This is one of the newest ones off the line as far as I can tell. I had none of the issues reported with the earlier guns.

My initial impression is that the rifles amazingly light, but doesn't feel cheap or like a toy.
Its well fitted, accurate, and is an interesting piece of engineering, and that always appeals to me. It doesn't hurt that the things very attractive also.

On Saturday it came to the range and I set it up with a Burris Droptine 4.5-14x42, as seen here.
PXL_20210605_221043707.MP.jpg

The ammo I had on hand was Eley Club, Eley Target, Armscor HVs, and a little bag of random .22s that had everything from stingers to sniper sub-sonics.
Accuracy with the Eley Club was very good, except for random fliers. 7-8 shots out of a 10rnd mag would go into pretty much the same hole, then I'd get a few 1/2"-3/4" away. Wasnt consistent on when it would do it, and its very possible it was me just failing to be consistent.

I shot @Mr.Revolverguy's challenge with this gun, and didn't do great.
The shot on 14 was there from sight in, and the one high on 22 was my first shot. I went left from there then up to 30 and back to 28.

Not a fantastic showing, but if you overlay the groups were still looking at a sub 1" for the 4 that didn't go all wonky. Again, not FANTASTIC, but pretty good considering the conditions and a choice of only 2 types of ammo.
There also wasn't a huge difference between the 16 dollar box of Eleys, and the 3 dollar box of Armscor.....this is only about 100rnds into the gun.
PXL_20210606_050128532.jpg


Function was 100%, everything that went into the gun left it with no issues.
The bolt runs fine, but IS noticeably stiffer to lock and unlock than my 457...which has a fantastic feeling action.

When I picked up the rifle today, I immediately installed the adapter to run my Spartan Jav on the rifle, as I do with almost all of the guns I own.
While doing the installation I noticed the stock is a very thin (maybe a tenth +/- of an inch thick) fiberglass and gel coat shell over a light but fairly hard/ridgid foam core.
PXL_20210607_095414623.MP.jpg


My particular specimen weights in a 4.5lbs sans scope and ammo. With the Burris Timberline 4.5-14x32 which I'm pretty sure will be this guns constant companion, the whole rig weights 5.5lbs. I said earlier that its surprisingly light for not feeling like a toy, and ill stand by that. It feels GOOD in the hands, solid withought being heavy......don't know why that struck me as strange, but it did.
PXL_20210607_070338643.MP.jpg
If I have ANY knock on the gun, its that its "ONLY" got a TriggerTech Field trigger as opposed to Primary like the Mesa and above carry. I adjusted it down to 2.5Lbs which is as low as the adjustments go, and it feels fantastic.....Par for the course with TriggerTech it seems.

I am going to have an aluminum brake made for the gun, simply because I like a bit more length on my barrels.....and while this ones very accurate, the short tube doesn't look right to me.

I hope to have the gun out again on Saturday, so hopefully a bit more through a work out.

PXL_20210610_042538890.MP.jpg PXL_20210610_042549887.MP.jpg
 
Last edited:
I am anxious to see how it does once you have it broken in good and have found its preferred ammo. I have those Droptine scopes on 2 of my rimfires and think they are fantastic scopes for the money. Mine have the G2B reticle which has thinner hash marks. I wish they hadn't discontinued those.
 
I'd also like to see an update on this when you get a bit more experience and ammo variety. Sharp looking gun but I agree that the barrel would look better if it were an inch or two longer. Thanks for the write up and pictures.
 
I am anxious to see how it does once you have it broken in good and have found its preferred ammo. I have those Droptine scopes on 2 of my rimfires and think they are fantastic scopes for the money. Mine have the G2B reticle which has thinner hash marks. I wish they hadn't discontinued those.
Ive been very happy with all of my Burris scopes, and the Droptines currently been moved to my carbon barreled 700. The Timberline isnt quite as forgiving, but is about a 5oz lighter, and offers similar performance in good lighting, which isnwhy it got moved over.
It would be nice to have a bit finner reticle, when shooting the challenge targets anything smaller than the 22 and i was basically just shooting for the middle of the big circle.

I'd also like to see an update on this when you get a bit more experience and ammo variety. Sharp looking gun but I agree that the barrel would look better if it were an inch or two longer. Thanks for the write up and pictures.
Ill try get a couple more options, but 22s are one of those things that are available in limited variety right now.
If i can get rid of those fliers what i have on hand SHOULD produce some very respectable results.

Something i forgot about in the review.
The shank on the muzzle threads (at least on my sample) is .640" long, which is about the same as used on ARs. My 457s barrel only has about .4-.5" long threads, and I guess thsts fairly standard for .22s.
Im also not familiar with .22 suppressors, but at least a couple of my 1/2-28" muzzle brakes and flash hiders wouldnt go flush on the Ranger unless you used a spacer of some sort.

I've got the older model, the 452. It's one of my forever gats.
A friend of mine has a 452 varmint that is very accurate and enjoyable, I dount anyone will ever get that gun away from him .....I ALMOST bought a 452 Grand Finale when I ordered my 457, but was a few hundred bucks short at the time.
Im very happy with my 457 tho, and i think its a worthy descendent.
 
Loonwulf, Watch the stock where the action screws are. I had a friend that bought one of those, and his stock cracked around the actions screws.
For what that gun cost, you'd think Christensen would've made a better / thicker stock.
 
Loonwulf, Watch the stock where the action screws are. I had a friend that bought one of those, and his stock cracked around the actions screws.
For what that gun cost, you'd think Christensen would've made a better / thicker stock.
Thanks for the heads up, ill keep an eye on it.
I believe ive read of there being issues with the Invar pillars not being quite to spec, or bedded a little proud. If they were short, or especially loose, i could see the stock taking the brunt of any force applied to the action and cracking the relatively thin glass.

From my understanding, the foam in stuff like these isnt really ment to provide much structural support,
 
So far the Ranger continues to make me smile.....
While this probably isnt super impressive to good shots with bench guns, this is pretty good for me with a 5.5lb rifle.

Conditions were poor. Intermittent light rain, heavy fog, and gust of wind....so most accuracy testing was conducted in very short periods mostly similar condition.

Pictures taken after i got home
#13 is 10rnds of Cci Select, which ive never seen before. The Eley club shot about the same, maybe a little tighter (which could have just been me, there was an easy 1/4" wobble in my position), and the Armscor would toss a flyer, but otherwise stacked bullets just the same also.

The other targets all got shot up pretty badly, but the #14 is a group of Eley fired from my heavy 457. There are....a few hits.... in there from my .22 buckmark during sight in also.
PXL_20210613_074150533.jpg

I have video of both groups, but it needs to be sped up to be worth watching, ill post them later.
 
Last edited:
Ill try get more variety of ammo here soon, I know where there's some federal gold medal match but I'm loath to spend 24 bucks a box on it lol. That and Eley are about the only "match grade" ammo I can get locally.

I'm actually quite happy with a producing two minute of angle accuracy or better with pretty much all the off-the-shelf ammo I have on hand.
 
upload_2021-7-1_0-22-40.jpeg
I really like the looks of that CA. Congrats. As you know, I’m a fan of CA rifles. This is what my CZ 452 with CCI gamepoints does at 100 yards. This is a 5 shot group. I wouldn’t trade that gun for anything.
 
View attachment 1008599
I really like the looks of that CA. Congrats. As you know, I’m a fan of CA rifles. This is what my CZ 452 with CCI gamepoints does at 100 yards. This is a 5 shot group. I wouldn’t trade that gun for anything.
thanks!

thats very fine accuracy for any .22! Ive not had decent conditions when the Rangers been out to shoot it at 100yds, hopefully sometime in the near future ill get a chance. My 457, even with its LW heavy barrel wont consistently do that at well 100yds with any ammo Ive found so far.
Thats also very fine shooting lol, doesn't take much to punch one out of the group with a .22 at that range.
 
Last edited:
thanks!

thanks very fine accuracy for any .22! Ive not had decent conditions when the Rangers been out to shoot it at 100yds, hopefully sometime in the near future ill get a chance. My 457, even with its LW heavy barrel wont consistently do that at well 100yds with any ammo Ive found so far.
Thats also very fine shooting lol, doesn't take much to punch one out of the group with a .22 at that range.
Should have said, it’s a 17HMR. My .22 is a 457 scout, but it shoots those groups out to about 60 yds
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top