CMP M1 Garand

Status
Not open for further replies.
For pics, here's what I received from CMP last week:
j0frsz.jpg
No, it didn't come with the scope or sling. And it is a CMP "Special" chambered in .308. (The sling is not installed "the Army way." It is rigged for shooting in a way that works for me.)
 
Baz,
What stock is that on your rifle/ It looks new, but doesn't look like the CMP black walnut, and doesn't look nearly as "orange" as the typical CMP birch stock.
 
Rifle looks good, now get rid of that scout scope and go back with the wood.
That looks like a replacement birch stock. Is it cartouched anywhere?
 
it's a CMP special so it is a new stock from them, the only one they list is walnut so it must just be the light.
 
it's a CMP special so it is a new stock from them, the only one they list is walnut so it must just be the light.
This is correct. It is the walnut stock. Besides the lighting, it has had three coats of oil applied to it, which doesn't really lighten it, but does add a gloss that is reflecting the light, and makes it seem lighter in the picture than it really is.

The scope stays. It is a concession to my aging eyes (as well as a crutch for shooting cross eye dominant). Sorry if it upsets the aesthetics of some, but I bought the gun to shoot, not just look at.
 
Just curious. It looked very different from the CMP black walnut of my CMP Service Grade Springfield:


DSC_0122.jpg

DSC_0120-1.jpg
 
ust curious. It looked very different from the CMP black walnut of my CMP Service Grade Springfield:
The oil lightened it a little, but the picture makes it seem lighter than it really is. Is yours unfinished? What I got was a very dry dark walnut stock. Nicely stained, but very dry. So I put a few (three) coats of oil on it to give it a more finished appearance. I'm happy with it, even if the picture doesn't do it justice. Here's the same picture, with the brightness toned down a bit, that seems a little closer to its actual appearance: 17u2xl.jpg
 
Is yours unfinished?

No. Those photos were taken after I applied five coats of Pure Tung Oil (the excellent Real Milk Company stuff). The stock came rather dry from the CMP.
 
You guys' excellent Garand photos make my mouth water, and inspire me to wait not much longer for a drive to Anniston, for a second M-1.

The wood on those rifles looks very nice, no matter which color.
 
Got this beauty from the CMP circa 2008, ordered it while I was deployed. Excellent hand picked model. I was very excited to see it when I got home and opened it.
 

Attachments

  • P1090195c.JPG
    P1090195c.JPG
    117.9 KB · Views: 66
lead counsel,
awesome tiger stripe stock. you hit the jackpot there. always have wanted to find a good with nice tiger wood but never have.
 
Well, If we are showing off CMP armorer's tag, I'll have to show off mine for the Service Grade Springfield I posted above: :D

DSC_0050.jpg
 
From the days of the $295 Greek Rack Grades woefully long gone. The price not the rifles.
:cool:
 
Last edited:
P5 guy, did your greek M1s have all the cartouches gouged out? my M1 I got had the cartouches defaced and the only explanation Iv'e heard is that it may have been a loaner to greece and they might have done it. any truth to it?
 
Get rid of the scout scope? Why?
It was my pic the comment was about, and I just assumed that carbine85 likes his Garands to be traditional in appearance. But other than the receiver, my Garand has no pretensions to being original (and even the receiver is from '54, I think, so it is hardly a war relic). It has new wood and a new barrel chambered in .308. As I said in reply, I got it to use it, and to use it, I need the scope. While the scout mount is probably the easiest way to get a scope on a Garand, I happen to prefer the scout mount and have several other rifles configured in such fashion. Not all like the scout mount, and that's fine with me. It's a free country, and everyone is entitled to their opinion. By the way, the Garand had something to do with that. ;)
 
It was my pic the comment was about, and I just assumed that carbine85 likes his Garands to be traditional in appearance. But other than the receiver, my Garand has no pretensions to being original (and even the receiver is from '54, I think, so it is hardly a war relic). It has new wood and a new barrel chambered in .308. As I said in reply, I got it to use it, and to use it, I need the scope. While the scout mount is probably the easiest way to get a scope on a Garand, I happen to prefer the scout mount and have several other rifles configured in such fashion. Not all like the scout mount, and that's fine with me. It's a free country, and everyone is entitled to their opinion. By the way, the Garand had something to do with that. ;)

;)

I just need a cheek riser.

Anybody have suggestions for a cheek riser or similar to get a better cheek weld with the scout scope mounted?

20130202_205554_zpsf8c9b165.gif
 
From the days of the $295 Greek Rack Grades woefully long gone. The price not the rifles.
:cool:

I bought several of the Greek Rack HRAs for "bad bores". Every single one of them cleaned up to SG criteria, and I had a lot of fun practicing cleaning/refinishing Garand stocks.

Wish I'd bought more and kept 'em as projects!
 
I just need a cheek riser.

Anybody have suggestions for a cheek riser or similar to get a better cheek weld with the scout scope mounted?
If you are shooting right handed, and you are left eye dominant, you don't need a cheek riser. ;) I do just that. I shoot right handed, but sight with my left eye. And because of the tilt I need to line my left eye up to see through the scope, I actually get a good cheek weld that way. Some people consider this odd, but I've been shooting this way for decades.

But assuming you are shooting right handed, and the right eye is dominant, then my approach doesn't work, and I cannot really help you. Good luck with the search for a cheek riser.
 
If you are shooting right handed, and you are left eye dominant, you don't need a cheek riser. ;) I do just that. I shoot right handed, but sight with my left eye. And because of the tilt I need to line my left eye up to see through the scope, I actually get a good cheek weld that way. Some people consider this odd, but I've been shooting this way for decades.

But assuming you are shooting right handed, and the right eye is dominant, then my approach doesn't work, and I cannot really help you. Good luck with the search for a cheek riser.

Right handed, Right eye dominant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top