Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Colt Rainmaker

Discussion in 'Firearms Research' started by kdave21, Mar 3, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. kdave21

    kdave21 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    350
    Well heres something interesting... Picked this up today from a guy. He only knew it was a .32, and to be honest I didnt really know what it was, although in retrospect, I guess I had seen plenty of lightnings and thunders and should have known it was in that family. Anyway, condition wise, not too hot, but his price was more than fair so grabbed it thinking it might be a parts gun for someone.... The mechanicals are screwed up, and it has its fair share of rust and corrosion. Looks like it is in the 71000 range.

    So I do some preliminary research and it seems that the Colt 1877 in .32 (apparently aka Rainmaker) is quite rare, who knew?

    I am posting this for a couple of reasons. First, i want to make sure I have correctly identified this as what I stated above. Secondly, it sounds like there are not a lot of pictures floating around of these, so I thought I would post it just for people to check out.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. kdave21

    kdave21 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    350
    Any information is welcome to. I have Flaydermans and Fjestads, but thats about it. Sounds like 200 made approx.
     
  3. kdave21

    kdave21 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    350
    Sorry for the poor pics, can probably post more if anyone is super interested.
     
  4. content

    content Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,015
    Location:
    South Carolina, born in Valley Forge Pa.
    Hello friends and neighbors // Nice save, too bad it does not work.

    I've seen the listing for "RainMaker"in the Blue Book but have never seen one.
    They list 300 manuf. between 1877-1909, but your source may be better.

    Thanks for posting
     
  5. Dr.Rob

    Dr.Rob Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    14,651
    Location:
    Centennial, CO
    Rare enough that I've never seen one.
     
  6. mgregg85

    mgregg85 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    2,008
    Location:
    Midland, MI
    Wikipedia has a little bit of info for you...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_Model_1877

     
  7. kdave21

    kdave21 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    350
    heres some "slightly" better pics. Have trouble photographing nickel guns.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 4, 2011
  8. WardenWolf

    WardenWolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5,884
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    An exposed protruding screw on the FRONT of the grip? Wow. Talk about bad design. Having read the Wikipedia article, it sounds like quite the turd.
     
  9. kdave21

    kdave21 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    350
    I doubt the screw is supposed to be there, not sure why it is there, probably some type of homemade repair, haven't checked into it yet. I dont know that I would say "turd." You cant expect one of the earliest DA's to be 100% perfected...
     
  10. Toml

    Toml Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2004
    Messages:
    170
    Location:
    Georgia
    That, my friend, is an understatement. Amazing that its parts are intact.
     
  11. WardenWolf

    WardenWolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5,884
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    If you look at the one on Wikipedia, it shows a screw there as well. Not as big, although it's still a protruding screw.
     
  12. kdave21

    kdave21 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    350
    Warden, good eye. Didnt notice that screw there on the wikipedia site till you said something. Interesting...
     
  13. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,615
    All the 1877's have a screw in that position to tension the mainspring, but it is small and almost headless; when tightened it is countersunk. That is probably a replacement.

    That is one of the really rare Colts, too bad it is in terrible shape. Wilson says only 200 were made in the 66000-121000 range, so that gun fits. It looks to be a .32 (and not an altered .38) because of the frame and cylinder proportions, which appear to be smaller than those of the .38 and .41.*

    Sadly, in spite of its rarity, the condition and the fact that it is not functional probably limit its value to under $1000.

    Jim

    *In spite of the common belief that the .41 is just a .38 with larger chambers, the two guns differ in the size of the frame and the cylinder diameter. Cylinders will not interchange. So it is not surprising that the .32 appears to be sized appropriately, not just a .38 with smaller chambers.

    JK
     
  14. kdave21

    kdave21 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    350
    Jim,
    I am wanting to sell this, what is your opinion...should I have it smithed or just sell it as-is? If I told you what I paid for this you would laugh (as in, I paid not much at all). I'm not super concerned with getting top dollar. If someone else is motivated to use some time and tie their money up in it, then they deserve to pick it up at a fair/good price. That doesnt mean however I wouldnt like making a little money on it of course...
     
  15. WardenWolf

    WardenWolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5,884
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Well, it's externally not in that bad shape. Yeah, it's rough, but far from ruined. No rust that I can tell. I'd say it's certainly fixable, and may be worth it to someone to fix. However, given that it's an unreliable hunk of junk, I suspect it's worth more as a collector's piece and keeping it original is more important, even if it's broken.

    Seems lots of things with the "Rainmaker" name are cursed. There was a paintball gun of the same name that was also overly intricate and unreliable.
     
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2011
  16. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,615
    Its only value is as a collector's item, as it would be useless as a shooting gun. It is chambered for the .32 Long Colt, which has not been made for many decades (.32 S&W Long won't fit).

    That whole 1877 series is almost unrepairable as 1) there is no real good parts supply and 2) very few gunsmiths will even touch them as they are so frustrating to repair.

    I think you should have no problem selling that gun on one of the gun auction sites, but I would sell it as is. Anything you might do or have done would probably decrease the value to a collector. It is an antique (1888) so there is no problem in shipping and no FFL needed by the recipient.

    Jim
     
  17. WardenWolf

    WardenWolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5,884
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Out of curiosity, would .32 S&W Short fit one of these firearms? I know the .32 Long guns can also fire shorts, so if the latter is simply too long for this one, it may be able to take the S&W Shorts, which are fairly easy to get. Of course, repairing it is pretty much out of the question, but this is conjecture.

    I just found this: http://www.coltforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18337

    Apparently SOME .32 Colt pistols can also take .32 S&W Long or .32 S&W Short. Most won't shoot Long,though. The case width for the S&W rounds is significantly different, but depending on the gun's tolerances they can sometimes fit. The Short rounds are well below the length of the original Colt rounds, as well.

    They can also shoot .32 Short Colt, which is still available in limited production.
     
  18. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,615
    The earlier CF Colt .32's fired .32 Short Colt, then the larger guns were made for the .32 Long Colt, as the Model 1877 was. Some Colts were made for those cartridges into the swing cylinder era, but due to the large number of makers chambeing for the .32 S&W and .32 S&W Long, the Colt cartridges went out of favor and Colt began chambering for the .32 S&W Long. Of course, Colt could never call it that, so they made a minor change to the bullet shape and called the result the .32 Colt New Police or .32 Police cartridge. (They did essentially the same with the .38 S&W, which became the .38 Colt New Police.) So obviously, some .32 Colt revolvers will accept the .32 S&W or .32 S&W Long, but not those chambered for the .32 Short or Long Colt.

    The .32 Short/Long Colt is smaller in diameter than the .32 S&W/.32 S&W Long, so the latter cartriges won't fit in a gun chambered for the former; it is not a matter of case length, it is a matter of case diameter.

    Jim
     
  19. BMur

    BMur Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    Messages:
    10
    Rainmaker

    I'd be interested in buying the old timer. I collect these and could use the parts
     
  20. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,615
    :cuss: Anyone who would tear down a Rainmaker for parts should be .... Excuse me; gotta go take my meds.

    Jim
     
  21. WardenWolf

    WardenWolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5,884
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Relax, Jim Keenan. This gun already doesn't work, and it's clearly seen much better days. There's undoubtedly many better-condition Rainmakers out there that could be restored to working condition with its parts.
     
  22. kdave21

    kdave21 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    350
    I agree with Jim on this. Ive seen now estimates of production that range from 200-300 of these made. Lets meet in the middle and say that 250 have been made. Now lets assume that 50% of those have been lost to time, thrown in rivers, whatever. That leaves 125 left. Why cannibalize any of the 125, for the sake of a few others? Of those 125, you know half of them probably aren't working (and that's probably optimistic), so if we used that half for parts, that leaves us only 62-63 functional examples in existence. I say keep it original, or rebuild em with new parts. Despite condition, I think it would be a shame to part it out. Just my two cents.
     
  23. BMur

    BMur Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    Messages:
    10
    Rare Colt

    Well Gents, I've had my meds and feelin fine. Collected these for 25 yrs and the most difficult part of collecting "Antique" revolvers is understanding "Market Value". So many opinions regarding condition and rarity but the simplicity of "Market Value" makes things clear. In other words: "Whats it worth"??? If say, I have 5 of these in my collection and 3 are functioning and complete. 2, however are missing parts but they are super rare variations of the Rainmaker. Say, one is a flat top target that is missing the cylinder and the other is 80%nickel but has a buldged barrel. Hmmmmm what should I do??? I would take the barrel and cylinder off this one, since the Rainmaker did "not" have numbered barrels or cylinders and put those parts on the two near mint examples. Then(without the meds) I'd put a long storekeeper barrel on this one in 38 caliber and matching cylinder,(They are interchangable, only difference is early and late frames cause clearance issues) and tune the action with the parts I have. Sound fair?
     
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2011
  24. deadin

    deadin Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,103
    Location:
    Ocean Shores, WA
    Let's see....Market Value?? The value of your two incomplete/damaged guns as they currently are subtracted from the value of them after they are repaired should be a pretty close estimate of what the OP's gun should be worth. (Plus the value of whatever you are going to make from the leftover parts less the value of the long storekeeper barrel):evil:;)

    Even parts guns can be valuable if they are rare enough. (And somebody needs the parts.)
     
  25. BMur

    BMur Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    Messages:
    10
    EXACTLY! Nice to see someone gets it!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page