Community Suggests Gun Possession Is Illegal For Residents

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kael

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Messages
127
Location
Baltimore MD
Community Suggests Gun Possession Is Illegal For Residents

ANTIOCH, Tenn.- Some people in a Nashville neighborhood are furious over a new rule that makes it illegal to own a gun.

Residents in Nashboro Village said it's unconstitutional and leaves them defenseless.

Two weeks ago, residents received a letter from their homeowners' association indicating that guns are not allowed on the property.

"It thought it was ironic that they say you can't have something when the United States government says you can," said resident Cristina Salajanu.

Salajanu would like to give her neighborhood management company a history lesson.

"I think it's unconstitutional," Salajanu said. "They can't tell you what to own or not to own in your own house."

Salajanu is talking about the Bill of Rights, specifically the Second Amendment, which grants citizens the right to keep and bear arms. It's been an American freedom for 215 years but Salajanu and other residents said it's been taken away from them.

"Something needs to be done," she said.

Two weeks ago, the property management company at Nashboro Village told its residents no more guns on the property.

"It incensed me that it was written the way it was," said a resident who asked not to be identified.

She said there is a serious need to feel protected here and a firearm can do that.

"We've got dark areas, the lighting is very definitely very dim," she said.

Salajanu said that burglaries started to increase since late summer...

She said she believes her neighborhood has changed since she moved in last year.

"Three weeks ago someone was stopped at gunpoint," Salajanu said. "It seems the nature of those burglaries is becoming more dangerous."

Some residents at Nashboro Village have campaigned for better lighting and more security but if they can't get either they at least want their Second Amendment rights upheld.

"If I'm walking if I'm walking my dog or if I am outside walking and if I don't feel safe and I'm licensed then I'll carry a gun," said the resident who did not want her identity disclosed.

Officials with Ghertner and Company, the property manager at Nashboro Village, would not make an on-camera comment about the gun policy but said they plan on changing the rule soon to allow firearms on the property.

However, they would make it illegal to fire those guns, which residents say is still unconstitutional.

Neighbors said they understand the gun rule is meant to keep criminals out of Nashboro Village but they don't believe that prohibiting firearms is the best way to do that.

I don't see how the HOA thinks they can get away with this. :cuss:
 
Neighbors said they understand the gun rule is meant to keep criminals out of Nashboro Village but they don't believe that prohibiting firearms is the best way to do that.

Well, duh.

Another case of good intentions gone wrong. "Meant to keep criminals out", but instead will be seen as "victim enhancement" by the crooked set.
 
They should post a big sign 'Our residents have no guns!'. They could turn it into a minature England which is a good model for gun free communities everywhere.
Sounds like some people might be suing the Home Owners Association I wonder if they have a good lawyer?
 
The problem is that in many parts of the US, if you are buying a house anywhere near where you work, you HAVE to get into a community with a HOA-- complete with all the rules, regulations, and FINES.

I went through this looking for a house in Orlando, FL a while back.

Interesting side story:

The father of a girl I was dating there lived in an upscale community in Tampa. He built a gazeebo out back that he failed to get prior permission for. Now, you have to understand... this gazeebo was behind a 10' privacy fence and was NOT visible to any neighbors.

Still, the HOA began fining him $50 per day until it was torn down.

Being the kind of guy he was, he carefully went through the regulations and discovered that there is no regulation against having "shrunken heads" (those faked up ones from coconuts) outside. Now, the beautiful oak tree on the STREET outside his home has 5 of these "shrunken heads" hanging from it.


Classic.

John
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top