Neverwinter
Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2008
- Messages
- 1,049
You said "My sense is that a higher percentage of those carrying illegally would ignore it than lawful carriers; if that's true, does that tell us something about the "rightness" of ignoring the sign?"How can they stand on their own? Ethics presuppose people interacting. One need not be a "strict deontological ethicist" to take note of what people actually do, and how they feel about it.
Ethics can tell you which values are in conflict in in a given situation--how do they tell you which of values you should choose as governing, and which as subordinate? That takes value judgment, and that's the job of individuals--or groups of them.
The merits of those who partake in the activity do not affect the merits of an activity, and making the assumption otherwise is fallacious. If the proportion of thieves is higher than the proportion of legitimate purchasers when it comes to people who do not stop for the doorman at retail stores, it doesn't have any bearing on the ethics of stopping for the doorman.
Last edited: