Too much perceverating about calibers & shot placement and not enough thought about reducing the risk of conflict in the first place.
Well it is a gun forum....
Too much perceverating about calibers & shot placement and not enough thought about reducing the risk of conflict in the first place.
And it's still winter....Well it is a gun forum....
Well, the question was not about reducing the risk of conflict, was it?bdickens said: ↑
Too much perceverating about calibers & shot placement and not enough thought about reducing the risk of conflict in the first place.
Which is why I use 38 wadcutters for home defense, in a 2" S&W I can make a 5 shot, quarter size hole at 10 yds which would be max indoor range so I feel perfectly comfortable and even for carry in town. Now I do also have 9mm, 40 S&W, and 45 ACP, but close point and shoot accuracy isn't as good as with the wadcutters!How about this?
If there are TWO hungry wild wolfs on the other side of a large room about to be released and in front of you there are these on the table:
You have a second to choose to defend your life.
- Glock 17 with 17 rounds of 9mm Gold Dot HP
- Glock 22 with 15 rounds of 40S&W Gold Dot HP
- Glock 21 with 12 rounds of 45ACP Gold Dot HP
- Glock 20 with 15 rounds of 10mm Gold Dot HP
Which would you choose?
How about from these against ONE hungry wild wolf?
My choice?
- Glock 19 with 15 rounds of 9mm Gold Dot HP
- Glock 23 with 13 rounds of 40S&W Gold Dot HP
- Glock 30 with 10 rounds of 45ACP Gold Dot HP
- Glock 29 with 10 rounds of 10mm Gold Dot HP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For me, I would make my selection based on my ability to hit moving targets fast because missed shots don't count no matter what caliber it is.
I think good shot placement with a proper sized bullet from adequate cover reduces the risk of conflict, don't you agree?Well, the question was not about reducing the risk of conflict, was it?
What? No!I think good shot placement with a proper sized bullet from adequate cover reduces the risk of conflict, don't you agree?