I am going to begin saving for a new pistol. Nothing that I want to carry. I already like my Kimber for that. This is shearly for recreational purposes. I am thinking of buying a H&K. Either a USP 45 or a Mark 23. My question is whether there is a significant difference in the two to justify a $1400 difference. My inital feeling is to pursue the USP based solely on costs and easy availability.
Anyone care to comment. And please, let's not make this a H&K bashing session like I have seen before. If you do not have anything constructive to contribute, don't.
Thanks,
GT
Anyone care to comment. And please, let's not make this a H&K bashing session like I have seen before. If you do not have anything constructive to contribute, don't.
Thanks,
GT