Cool Beretta 92 Combat

Status
Not open for further replies.

bc1023

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
1,214
I was able to work out a deal for this super rare Beretta 92 Combat. To me, this pistol was the high water mark for the 92 series guns and Beretta handguns in general from a performance and precision standpoint.

The 92 and 96 Combat series were Beretta’s single action IPSC pistols. They debuted about 15 years ago and were produced for just a short time. They were built for speed and accuracy and came with many racy features such as front slide serrations, coarse checkering on the front and back strap, large adjustable sights, a large mag release button, and magazines with large rubber bases for easy control and protection from dropping. The Combat also features a finely tuned SAO trigger and an accurizing barrel busing around the end of the 150mm barrel. The barrel weight at the muzzle helps improve overall balance and handling. The large, frame mounted ambi safety is easy to reach and operate. The thin aluminum grips feature tacky texturing to further improve traction and control. Needless to say, the Combat has all the bells and whistles that a competitive shooter could hope for.

My thoughts are this Beretta are very positive. I will include it in some accuracy testing in the future and I expect it to hold its own against all of the most accurate pistols from around the world.

Here is some additional information on the Combat:

http://www.berettaweb.com/92 combat/beretta combat.htm



As far as availability is concerned, its not there, unfortunately. There weren’t many built in the first place and the 92 Combat was never imported into the USA. Any amount of them that are in the country were all shipped in privately. This one is new-old stock and was never fired outside the factory. It is date coded “BP” for 2001. As with most 92 series pistols, the frame is aluminum and the slide is steel. The matte black finish is ok, I guess, but I would have preferred something a little different. The gun doesn’t feel as huge in hand as most 92 pistols, thanks to the thin grips.

The Combat comes in a big kit which includes two extra mags, a 5“ barrel, a special bushing wrench, and a cleaning brush. It also comes with a standard 92 owner’s manual and a special owner’s manual just for the Combat and Stock pistols, which is a nice touch.

Please enjoy the pics...


019_zps5xarnx31.jpg

025_zps24kaymiy.jpg

021_zpsx1chkmz7.jpg

026_zpscjc7gkji.jpg

IMG_3077_zpsqlt0qv66.jpg

IMG_3076_zpso0n0s20l.jpg

IMG_3079_zpsy2i6dtrs.jpg

IMG_3080_zpscazwpg7f.jpg
 
Last edited:
Very cool. I congratulate you on your collection of very cool guns. Keep it up.:)

I think forum member Morgo has one of those too. He's shown it off a few times.

I bet that gun is a joy to shoot.
 
Very nice... wish I could get a 92 with the frame mounted safety these days without going over to a Taurus. Honestly, that's the only thing stopping me from buying a new Beretta.
 
So what you are saying is......somewhere out there, is a Beretta 92 that I would actually want lol.
All kidding aside, the slide mounted safety and DA/SA operation of the 92 is pretty much what keeps me away from buying one.
In my very humble opinion, DA/SA is a feature that is there to mitigate accidents when you have to teach 100,000 mil/police (some of whom are bound to be reckless and fail to follow instruction) how to shoot and carry a pistol.

If I could get my hands on an SAO variant, I would buy it tomorrow.
 
bc1023

Indeed a very cool Model 92! In concept it kind of reminds me of the old Benelli B76 Sport. Let us know how it does at the range.
 
bc1023

Indeed a very cool Model 92! In concept it kind of reminds me of the old Benelli B76 Sport. Let us know how it does at the range.

Thanks

As for the Benelli, I guess its a similar concept, though those pistols are delayed blowback guns while the Beretta uses a Walther falling block design.
 
bc1023

I had a Benelli B76 so I'm all too familiar with the inertia locked operating system it used (along with all those little parts that went into it). By similar concept I was basically referring to the fact that both companies were taking their basic service model gun and modifying it for use for some other application.
 
bc1023

I had a Benelli B76 so I'm all too familiar with the inertia locked operating system it used (along with all those little parts that went into it). By similar concept I was basically referring to the fact that both companies were taking their basic service model gun and modifying it for use for some other application.

That's cool. I like the Benelli pistols and own several myself, to include sporting models. The Benelli MP3S is more similar to the Beretta Combat in that the company switched to a SAO trigger system. The B76 Sport has the service gun's DA/SA trigger.

...but, yeah, the concept is similar. Several companies have turned their service pistols into sporting pistols. FN did it with the Browning Hi Power, Walther did it with the P88, Bernardelli did it with the P One, HK did it with the P9S, Sig did it with several P series guns, CZ did it with the 75, MAB did it with the PA-15, and on and on...

I always liked the concept. :cool:
 
Very nice... wish I could get a 92 with the frame mounted safety these days without going over to a Taurus. Honestly, that's the only thing stopping me from buying a new Beretta.
Why not go over to the Taurus? I've been following them since their first iteration of 92-styled guns. That and the horrible two-tone of its stainless model is what kept me from buying a Beretta. I wish my Smith 659 had that safety.
 
And in the lovely state of CA, that pistol is not on our roster of approved handguns.
Not your fault, but I still can't buy one.
If you wanted to buy one, what would happen if your dealer ordered one and simply called it a Beretta M92? Would the state really make an issue of it?

CaliforniaFlag_1.jpg
 
If you wanted to buy one, what would happen if your dealer ordered one and simply called it a Beretta M92? Would the state really make an issue of it?

CaliforniaFlag_1.jpg

Yep. Goes by a specific SKU. If the SKU number is the same that would fly. I highly doubt that it is the case. Most manufacturers will list a gun under a different SKU even for minor production differences such as sights or grips.
It sucks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top