Cooper 52

Status
Not open for further replies.

supercalvin56

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2010
Messages
119
Politics aside....is the Cooper 52 the very best production big game rifle made today? I'm not talking about guns over $2500, like the Nosler or HS Precision, to me they are custom guns. I'm talking about walking into a gun store and buying one off the shelf. Coopers seem to be the most accurate, best designed with the nicest wood. I know they aren't cheap but, I normally see them for $1500-$1700. I've never seen a used one so I don't know what they cost.
 
Well I own a Cooper 52 Jackson Hunter in .280 Ackley Improved, and I can give you a few opinions if you'd like. Actually I don't care if you'd like them or not cause you're going to get them anyway.

My rifle had to go back to the factory due to the barrel crown being bead blasted inside the barrel likely due to a loose rubber plug during final metal finishing. Needless to say I was highly aggravated by this. Cooper took about a month to get it re-barreled and turned around back to me. I've had faster service from other manufacturers, but I've also had worse service. The new barrel also got a new test target with yet another disgustingly tight three shot group. The gunsmith that did the work wisely chose not to bead blast the new crown area so it was left in a state of high polish (which I appreciate!). Unfortunately, I have been so busy at work, and our weather has been so bad lately that I haven't had any time to get out and shoot the new barrel to see how it does.

I highly doubt that if you bought one that you would encounter a problem with a bead blasted bore, problems like that are very very rare. Even with the bead blasting damage at the crown the rifle still shot around 1" groups with 140gr Nosler Accubonds, which is not too bad for an off the shelf rifle.

One other thing you should be aware of is that the rifle has a three lug bolt, and the extractor is positioned in such a way that it angles brass at about a 45 degree angle coming out of the ejection port. What this means for you or me is that a scope in low or medium rings with target turrets is not going to work at all. I had ordered a Nightforce NXS 2.5-10X32 for this rifle, but unfortunately when mounted in low or medium rings the finger adjustable windage turret interfered with case ejection. It was so bad that often times an empty shell casing would be kicked back into the port at worst, or at best would bounce out of the action off of the scope with a dinged up case mouth. Either way not an ideal situation. This is not a problem exclusive to Cooper rifles, but is shared by just about any that I can think of with three locking lug arrangements. Had I known just how far the turrets on the Nightforce stuck out I wouldn't have bothered ordering it at all. I know that a Leupold 2.5-8X36 Vari-X III works perfectly in medium extension rings, which are needed because the scope is so short it wont work with normal rings. I have a Swarovski Z3 3-10X42 with the BRX reticle on the way along with a set of low rings, and even if the lows don't work the mediums I already have will.

The plus side to that three lug bolt is that they tend to be more accurate and have more consistent lockup than a two lug arrangement, all things being equal. You are also rewarded with a shorter bolt throw, albeit with a heavier lift given the need to cock the striker with less cam surface area. The rifle also uses a spring loaded blade ejector so you can fling brass out of the rifle like you mean it, or dribble it out real gently during practice so you can easily find it.

The trigger is outstanding, and should you need to adjust it detailed instructions are included in the instruction manual. I have not felt the need to mess with mine, it seems to be set right around 3lbs and is super super crisp. There is no take up, no slack, no over travel, just a clean crisp sear release.

As you may have noticed the rifle uses a detachable single column magazine, it is made of heavy gauge stainless steel with an anodized aluminum bottom plate on mine. The follower is highly polished and very well finished as well. Combined with a well thought out feeding ramp in the receiver the rifle feeds shells very very smoothly, even the .280 AI with its 40 degree shoulder. The bolt itself glides back and forth with little resistance or play enhancing the feeling of smooth functioning even further.

As for cosmetics, the metal work and fit to the synthetic fiberglass/kevlar/aluminum stock are all top notch. Cooper also glass bedded the action and stock even though it has an aluminum bedding block, a nice touch. The matte bluing on the receiver is nice and even with a very smooth bead blasted surface finish (unlike say a Remington with a similar finish that looks and feels like sandpaper), the color also matches the machined and anodized aluminum trigger guard/bottom metal.

Overall I think the rifle is worth the money given what you get, even after my initial trouble with mine.
 
I do not own one and am not knocking Cooper who have a sterling reputation and make a very desirable rifle - maybe the best in the USA? I would say that Merkel and Sako might make equal quality? All three are glass smooth and feed well. All print small groups out the box. In my mind, they all build rifles that you could be proud of owning and willing to pass down the line :)
 
I've never had the opportunity to shoot a Merkel, but I do have some experience with SAKO rifles and while they look nice, and are very well made, they are not (in my experience) any more accurate than many other lesser priced rifles.
 
I own two Coopers set up for varminting. I've been extremely pleased with them. No problems to speak of.

Is a Cooper the best big game rifle? I don't think so, they're a bit pretty to drag through the woods.

If you have the money and don't mind some character on that nice stock then go for it.

I'm sure it'll exceed your expectations (unless you luck out like Coal Dragger...everyone has a lemon, but at least they're making it right).
 
I'm really hoping for a break in the weather to see just how "right" they made it! I have high hopes that I can say I am completely and utterly satisfied.

On a side note, having snow for Thanksgiving, and temps below zero outside is a big old load of BS in my book...

As for being too pretty to drag about and use hard, I agree, which is why I purchased the stainless barrel and synthetic stock. That way should I get a scratch in the stock it can be put right with some black paint, and I won't lose sleep thinking about it after that.
 
I would'nt dare say that they are the best but Cooper makes a great rifle regardless of the model. I have a few and they have all been great shooters and never had a problem with any of them.

I had one of first run of M52's in 25-06 and wound up selling it before I even had a chance to shoot it to a fella that wanted it more than I and paid my asking price for it for it.:D Some great wood for a non spec factory rifle.

CooperM521.jpg

CooperM525.jpg

Not a great pic to show off the wood but here are a group of M22's
coopers1.jpg
 
Thanks guys for the information/opinions on the Cooper 52! Coal Dragger: thank you especially for the thorough review. That type honest critique is seldom found in gun magazines.
I do have another Cooper, a model 21 Phoenix in 204. It is an excellent rifle that lead me to buy a Model 52. I haven't fired it yet. I've always been a sucker for nice wood. When this 25-06, with AA french walnut, dropped a couple hundred bucks at Scheels, I couldn't resist any longer. I traded a Savage 12 to help take away some of the sting.
I mounted a 3-9 Nikon Monarch in Warne medium rings. Judging from your review of the Leupy 2.5-8 I shouldn't have problems. The Nikon did just barely fit without using extension rings. And, luckily, the eye relief came out just fine. I did notice the extra effort needed to cock the action. My trigger also, is very clean and crisp. It is better than my model 21 trigger.
IMR 4831, IMR 4350, and H4831 are the powders I used when loading some 100 grain Sierra's. I am NOT looking forward to "breaking in" the barrel. Cleaning after every shot, for the first 20-30 shots, seems a little overboard. I suppose you have to do that again with the new barrel? I'll post a range report when I shoot a few groups. My expectation is for 1/2-3/4" groups. Anything smaller and I'll be in love. Anything larger and I'll be trading it off.
 
I am running a 120gr Sierra HPBT's behind Alliant's Reloder 25 at just over 3100fps in this 25-06.Though only 3 shot groups , this was shot consecutively,it easily averaged under 1/2" at 100yds with that load. This rifle was not broken in, just worked up loads until I found the magic one.Your milage will vary.

25-06cooper.jpg
 
Last edited:
Those groups look very good to me. If mine shoots like that it will definitely be a keeper. I was going to try Reloader 22 but never considered Reloader 25. There are plenty of internet shooters that claim their rifles will shoot 1/2" groups "all day long". It is more believable with pictures. Thanks!
 
I have no doubt there are many rifles that can shoot 1/2" all day long with ammo they like, I just doubt there are many shooters who can actually shoot up to their rifle's potential!

Every once in a while I can, but not every minute of every day. I'm a human, not a robot.

Also Supercalvin56, for what it's worth according to my handy dandy owners manual the folks at Cooper call for cleaning after every 5 shots for the first 20 rounds for break in.

My owners manual also states that it is for the models: 54 (short action .308 family), 52 (standard action .30-06 family), and 56...... I wonder what a model 56 is going to be......?
 
Thanks for checking the manual regarding break-in cleaning. That is going to make it much easier. I called Cooper and learned that extra magazines cost $89 plus S&H. Can you load 3 in the magazine and one more in the chamber without binding issues? With the Monarch scope in Warne rings/bases and a Montana sling mine does not feel too heavy.
I really like the French walnut. Besides being unusual it seems denser and smoother than Claro or Am. Black walnuts. Mine is straight grained but with contrasting streaks and relatively plain. I wouldn't want to show up in deer camp with a full custom exhibition grade stock...friends would accuse me of being from Minneapolis. :rolleyes:
 
All things considering, given the high quality of the magazines I don't think $89 is all that outrageous. Heck I paid $89 for a Steyr rotary magazine made of cheap plastic for my SSG 69, and I've had two of them fail me already.

As for loading three rounds with one in the chamber, it is not a problem. In fact you can place a full magazine in the receiver and push the column of cartridges down with your thumb, place a round on top of them and run the bolt forward to push the round in without even touching the rounds in the magazine.

I also chose a Montana sling for my rifle, whoever invented it was a damn genius. I usually gravitate towards 1907 military slings of good quality so I can loop up, but this Montana sling works well as a hasty sling, and it is fast and secure to adjust....so it'll do.
 
Supercalvin56,

If you like wood stocks, also look into good English walnut, very very tight smooth grain and excellent figure, very dense, very strong. Sadly also very expensive for good kiln dried and aged blanks.
 
DubbleA,
Those are some nice stocks! I'm not crazy about the checkering pattern on the Custom Classic but WOW what a piece of walnut. Who ever designed the Cooper stocks knows what guns are supposed to look like. They are art as much as rifles and accurate to boot. What more can a guy ask for?
 
Well I finally got around to sighting in the rifle after the re-barrel and new scope going on.

I'll try to get a photo posted up if possible.

Anyhow the setup is as follows:

Cooper Arms Model 52 Jackson Hunter. 24" stainless bbl, in .280 AI, bedded in a fiberglass and kevlar composite stock with aluminum bedding block. I mounted a Swarovski Z3 3-10X42 with the BRX reticle on top in standard Leupold low rings and bases.

After fiddling with the windage adjustable base at 25 yards to get more or less on target at the 100 yard line, I moved back to 100 yards, cleaned the barrel, and fired two rounds to see where I was. The first two shots were touching 1/2" above my desired zero, and 3/4" to the right of center. I came down 2 clicks, and left 3 clicks, then fired a three shot group. The three shot group measured right at .637, and I should have quit while I was ahead but being greedy tried for a five shot group that opened to about .716 measured from center to center. Ammo used was the 140gr Nosler Accubond as loaded by Nosler Custom ammunition, ostensibly loaded to 3150fps.

All shooting was done over a Caldwell front bag, no rear bag, off of a homemade three legged shooting table, while sitting on a folding chair. I suppose off of a more solid table, with a nice benchrest and rear bag I could have done better but honestly my benchrest shooting technique is a bit lacking. I am confident this rifle, scope, and ammo can do better than I can and a better benchrest shooter could realize those gains.

Still, overall, for a hunting rifle fresh out of the box with the very first load I could lay hands on shoved into the chamber these are very promising results. I'm looking forward to seeing what can be achieved with some reloads.
 
Well here are some photos of the rifle and scope:
 

Attachments

  • New crown.jpg
    New crown.jpg
    235.2 KB · Views: 15
  • Open Action.jpg
    Open Action.jpg
    269.7 KB · Views: 16
Last edited:
A few more photos, note the target. Frankly I think I can do better than this if I were to aim dead on at the circle, but I wanted to see if I could hold them all in the center using an aiming point 1" to 1.3" low per the instructions for the BRX reticle (which call for sighting in 1.3" high at 100yds) and the 140gr Accubond at 3150fps. Either way I should have called it quits at a 3 shot group..... just for personal pride.

The two shots at the upper right in the target box were the first two shots at 100yds after making gross windage and elevation adjustments at 25yds with the windage adjustable base. The scope was mechanically centered, and fortunately the rear base required only the tiniest bit of adjustment to get centered up. Overall I'm not disappointed since I think I am holding the rifle back from its full potential.
 

Attachments

  • Cooper 52 Magazine.jpg
    Cooper 52 Magazine.jpg
    268.6 KB · Views: 9
  • Sight in target and first 5 shot group..jpg
    Sight in target and first 5 shot group..jpg
    260.7 KB · Views: 14
Here is my new 52 with French walnut. Haven't fired it yet. The wife bought me the Nikon scope to top it off.
IMG_0274.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top