Criminals in Home Invasion Identify themselves as Local Police !

Status
Not open for further replies.
budney, I'm afraid that to have any credibility, you're going to have to provide some good links. 110 "No Knock" entries per day?
Sure. This reference also comes from the Cato Institute: Overkill: The Rise of Paramilitary Police Raids in America. The full report is a PDF. It cites the 40,000-per-year figure from Dr. Peter Kraska, “Researching the Police-Military Blur: Lessons Learned,” Police Forum 14, no. 3 (2005).

The same Kraska remarked in a BBC interview, "I get several calls a month from people asking about local incidents - wrong address raids, excessive use of force, wrongful shootings - this stuff is happening all the time."

--Len.
 
But, this is starting to sound like I'm slamming LEOs. Far from it.

I didn't think you were. And good point about LEO home invasions/scary losses of freedom. I agree 1000 percent.

And I wasn't slamming LEOs either, BTW. Some of my best friends are or were LEOs. But sometimes LEOs make really embarrassing, boneheaded mistakes.
 
Last edited:
Okay, stipulating the survey and conclusions are accurate: It's a 21-year record, averaging seven wrong addresses, nationwide, per year. Also, averaging two deaths per year, nationwide, of innocent people.

While I'd agree that one of either is Bad News, it seems to me that for 40,000 events per year, the screw-up rate is extremely small. One wrong address in 6,000 raids? One dead innocent per 20,000 raids?

I don't see how you can have 40,000 arrests of any sort without something bad happening.

Not that I approve of the WOD or no-knock...

Art
 
One wrong address in 6,000 raids? One dead innocent per 20,000 raids?
Art,
Wouldn't that be one too many of each. If it were your Mother/daughter/sister shot and killed in that one in 20,000, would it still be acceptable?
I say that any innocent death is too many innocent deaths.

Jefferson
 
jselvy, I don't think you need to repeat what I already said...

I guess my point is that I'm amazed that the Bad Things are as few as have occurred.

But the only solution is legislative.

Art
 
Citing habits from writing college papers. I have a bad habit of over-quoting.

Jefferson
 
ArmedBear

Thank you good sir! I've been on that site before as I recognized the opening page but I couldn't remember where it was. Google type searches bring up so much junk I sometimes lack the patience to wade through it.
 
I think that insurance company records would be a more reliable indicator than police self-reporting.

Also, I dont agree with Jeff's absurd claim that you need special signals and people taking turns watching 24/7.

All you need is enough mechanical obstructions to delay the intruders, enough sirens to wake the neighborhood and enough rifle to negate all cover. And those are just the anti-burglar provisions! I guess I anticipate really well armored burglars.

I think my legal instincts are good enough that I could avoid doing anything I wouldn't be able to justify before a judge or jury.

That being said, I think that the police accidentally raiding in this neighborhood are pretty slim. I mean, police live in this neighborhood, think of the risk! My personal experience is that the police are generally pretty careful. It would take a rare combination of sloppiness and trigger-happiness to make cops get the wrong address, then foolishly decide to kick in the door and then compound it by not identifying themselves and/or shooting the inhabitants. Do that in a house where people can afford lawyers (or happen to be lawyers) and it can land your entire department in hot water. Actually, far less than that can get you in a lot of trouble. A police agency has to be overcome by a pretty serious cancer of corruption and incompetence before these things start happening.
 
I hate these threads, and I hate no knock raids (see Cato Institute study -- An epidemic of isolated incidents).

Much as I dislike the FACT that the average citizen doesn't have much of a chance against a mistaken paramilitary raid (sad that we even have to think about this in the land of the free and the home of the brave), I still prefer having some sort of a defensive plan in the event of a home invasion against a group of thugs.

Would Jeff or Pax or Art critique this plan and tell me if it is realistic, or there should be more?

In event of a night intruder.

I have several portable motion detectors, and alarms on doors and windows at strategic entry points. My bedroom is up a long flight of open stairs, and I have a good strategic place of cover at the top just inside my bedroom door. I have a few other defensive measures in place to buy time, but I don't want to place them online.

In the event I get awakened (yeah, I know, any mistaken Swat raids and the first thing I'd see is blinding white light....), my plan is to:

1. Grab my bedside gun (Glock 22 with insight laser tac light), and if time allows...
2. Quietly take up defensive position atop stairs. Again, if time allows...
3. Call 911, inform them of intruder, don't hang up and place down phone
4. Announce, loudly, that I am armed and police have been summoned. Leave now.

I don't care about any material possesions, for which I have insurance and thats just stuff.

Does that sound reasonable? Are there other measures I should take? Any reasonable input is welcome. Thanx.
 
Also, I dont agree with Jeff's absurd claim that you need special signals and people taking turns watching 24/7.

It's not absurd at all. Mechanical devices can fail or be neutralized or otherwise defeated. Of course the person you have on watch could fall asleep....nothing is 100%. If those measures aren't necessary why are they SOP in combat?

SkiLune,
That sounds like a reasonable plan. I'd suggest that you keep a cell phone next to your land line in case the phone line has been cut.

Jeff
 
While I'd agree that one of either is Bad News, it seems to me that for 40,000 events per year, the screw-up rate is extremely small. One wrong address in 6,000 raids? One dead innocent per 20,000 raids?
I can't confirm or deny the error rate--but even with an error rate of 0%, that many commando raids on citizens is an obscenity. ANY commando-style raids is an obscenity, unless we're dealing with a volatile hostage situation or a mass murder in progress.

It's not absurd at all. Mechanical devices can fail or be neutralized or otherwise defeated. Of course the person you have on watch could fall asleep....nothing is 100%. If those measures aren't necessary why are they SOP in combat?
Absolutely. Nevertheless, partial measures are much better than no measures. Alarms, lights, hardening, etc., will greatly reduce the chances that casual invaders get in, and are among the measures least likely to directly result in a SWAT team gunning you down (unless, I suppose, the extra work breaking your door really pisses someone off).

Armed resistance against a SWAT team is pointless unless you really do plan to die in a blaze of glory: supposing you actually defeat the entire team, they'll simply surround your house with tanks. If you escape into the woods, you'll become the target of a nation-wide manhunt. If you don't make it to Mexico fast, you'll end up strapped to a gurney for sure.

BUT, slowing them down is helpful. It gives you time to wake up, at worst, and to call the police, at best. And if they penetrate reasonably solid defenses, then they're either cops or the A-Team. At least you'll be awake enough to realize that, and lay down with your hands on your head (and start the video cameras rolling, if you're smart!).

--Len.
 
If ONE member of THR can prove they were the victim of a mistaken address no knock, I'll take back the part about the meteorite. I contend that it's never happened to a member here, which makes it rarer then the meteorite strike.

No, it doesn't, and you know it. So I'm going to have to question the motive behind your arguments here, Mr. White.

Meteor strikes are virtually unheard of throughout the world in all of history. What's the membership of THR? Not a comparable sample by any stretch of the imagination, I'd say. Further, consider the stats that budney posted; 40,000 a year is a lot. Even if that's inaccurate by a factor of 10, it's still a lot.

Pax is right. And further, in the stories I've read, the citizen victims of no-knock raids often report that the police did not announce... and it doesn't really matter if they say "Police! Search warrant!", anyway, if the resident only wakes up afterward when the door is bashed in.

If someone invades my home in the middle of the night, I'm going to arm myself; I'd be foolish not to. And if it happens to be the police on a mistaken raid, I'm going to die.

This shouldn't happen in America.

It's interesting that the number of deaths in botched no-knock raids is so low. This topic is particularly relevant here on THR though, because this is a firearms community, and gun owners are probably more likely to be killed in the event of a mistaken police raid.
 
Any person who points a gun to any uniformed and properly identified LEO in my books is a fool and nothing but a fool, whether in his house in the sea or in the air... Want to get shot real fast for free try it..

But that's not the case here my advise is if someone knocks at your door claiming there police ask for ID (under the door) and call the Police department to verify prior to opening your door.

If some one kicks your door in with no way for u to identify then self defense is in order.

If someone kicks your door in full body armor, helmet and mp5 yelling police and you want to play crazy commando its hard to sue the police when you are dead but then again its your life not mine :D
 
Jeff- Not trying to stoke any flames here but I was the victim of a mistaken address warrant. In all fairness though it really was not that bad.

I was out in my shed on the fourth of July getting some garden tools out about four years ago and I looked out and saw a county car sitting in the drive (I lived in a different state at the time). I came out of the shed to see what he wanted and the officer said "Mr. Brown! Mr. Brown". He had his hand on his pistol, still holstered standing about 25 yards away.

I said "I am not Mr. Brown, he does not live here he lives XXXXX". I turned to walk off up into my garden.

He said "Stop! Stop! Mr. Brown" I turned back around and looked at him he looked at his papers (which had a picture of the guy on the top) and then back at me and back at the picture about three times, all while being quite tense. It looked like he was going to draw on me.

I said "Look at the height weight and you might notice that I am about ten inches taller and 100 pounds heavier". This caused him to relax a little but he still was not so convinced so I fished out some ID and showed it to him. Once this was done he still seemed a little miffed but I explained to him how he gotten our houses mixed up.

He said they often serve warrants on holidays because the person is normally home when the otherwise might not be. The guy was a neighbor who had moved away and was wanted for several charges of fraud and missing court and a few other non-violent crimes so there was no SWAT.

So yeah mix-ups happen a bit. I would say 99% of the time they do not end up in a shoot out with the police or with police abusing people for no reason. But that still happens also.

I suppose if I had kept going to my garden instead of waxing compliant then things could have gotten ugly. I did not feel any need to comply with the officer's orders as he had come on to my property and was ordering me around without cause. I also had the benefit of knowing what was going on (I knew that guy was in legal trouble and the police were looking for him) and no one was breaking down my door at 0300 either.

The police don't seem to understand that if you break down someone's door in the middle of the night people are just as likely to fight back if they know that they have done nothing wrong. I wonder if there is any training for this? I seriously doubt it.

Edit: You said you wanted proof. Of course I have no proof.
 
Hardening your home is absolutly the first step. It’s not all that difficult to do nor is it terribly expensive. If you are not handy with things electronic, get a friend and some steaks for the BBQ.

Anyone coming into my home is in for some rude surprises. I’m a professional electronics technician with a very active imagination. :evil: There will be no further details along this line. Just make sure that anything you dream up doesn’t involve booby traps! They will hang your butt for this!!

One thing I will talk about since knowing about it will make no difference. If you have a two storey house there is a way to buy some time. Fabricate a heavy grate made of steel bars to lay over the stairwell opening. Paint it flat black so it is virtually invisible from below. Hinge and counterbalance so it can easily be lifted. I case of an emergency just give it a yank and let it go to the upright position on its own. If the alarm trips it electrically locks down. Now you have your alarm system going off and the grate is securely locked into place. Can this be breached? Certainly. Anything can be. But, it will take time to figure it out and get things into place to do so. This will give you more than enough time to wake up and get yourself together. Plus, it would be an absolute hoot to see the first SOB come blasting up the stairs, split his skull open (or ring his bell if wearing a helmet), the roll a$$-over-tin cup back down the stairs. This alone will give them pause to figure out what happened.

Every place is different and will require a different approach. If this isn’t your cup of tea, talk to your friends. (Who knows? You might know someone like me.) Or, get some professional input. You will be surprised at what you can do and how little it costs.
 
Elza,
That's a portcullis. State of the 11th century art for castle defense. Who says that old solutions don't work. I love it. Could that be rigged to drop by a push button of some sort? For when you open the door for the wrong people?

Jefferson
 
No, it doesn't, and you know it. So I'm going to have to question the motive behind your arguments here, Mr. White.

My motives are quite simple. And very nefarious ;) My motives in trying to keep these threads from degenerating into 100+ posts of which 40% of the posts are members trying to one up each other talking about shooting anyone, police or not who breaks into their house. In an earlier thread on this subject a member even posted how he slept with his FAL by his bed so that he had the means at hand to penetrate body armor.

That motive is to keep the more vocal part of the membership from venting their frustrations with the system in a venue where their posts will be here as long as the server is up. Why, you ask should I want to do that?

It's quite simple, I want my grandkids to enjoy my guns long after I'm gone. And for the most part, the online firearms community is it's own worst enemy. You can go through the posts on any large firearms forum and find plenty of evidence that we are just as the antis like to portray us in the cartoons on the editorial page.

We think we are the majority in this country, the great silent majority. But the truth is, we aren't. Sure the statistics show that there are guns in more American households then not. But what the statistics don't show is that in most of those households, the gun is on the top shelf of a closet and it's lucky if the owner could tell you where it was without thinking about it for a minute. It's those people who are going to decide the future of RKBA in this country. The Brady's and the rest of their ilk have been pretty much marginalized. But they are still there.

The online firearms community is going a long way towards marginalizing themselves. What do you think the person who never really thought about guns before thinks when they inherit grandpa's or dad's gun and surfs around the web looking for info thinks when they surf onto a forum and starts reading some of the stuff that is posted here (and it's much worse in a lot of places)?

Do you think the discourse that goes on in this kind of thread wants to make them become one of us, or do you think they might think, "I don't want to be on the range with some of those people, they're crazy." What about supporting reasonable restrictions when it comes to new gun laws. Do you think they will see how unreasonable they really are after we've showed them we really are like the fat unshaven guy in BDU pants with the KKK t-shirt that was on the editorial page?

We are in a culture war. The urbanization or our society and the lack of places to shoot and the increase in other interests are all working against us. Why do we want to work against ourselves. A public online forum is not the place to post the same things you say to your buddies at the gun shop on Saturday morning.

We damage our cause every time we do that. People who aren't members of the gun culture read what's posted here. And like it or not, those people, not us, not the Bradys are going to decide the future of RKBA in this country.

The truth about home invasions:

Home invasions of the type our membership are worried about are so rare as they are almost non-existent. People just don't bust into other peoples homes for the purpose of robbery, not without knowing there is something worth paying the high price for. If you are wealthy enough and keep enough valuables in your home that you are at risk of that type of home invasion robbery, then you are likely to be hit by a professional criminal crew and you'll have about the same odds of successfully defending yourself as you would against the SWAT team.

Criminal home invasions fall into these categories:

Criminals ripping off other criminals...usually drugs and/or the cash that goes with them. Don't live that lifestyle and the chances of being a victim of that crime are zero.

Bad blood between the occupants and the home invaders....This is the most common type of home invasion. It occurs when someone feels they have been slighted and that the solution is to bust in and kick the offender's rear end. The bad guys usually are shocked to find out what kind of prison time they are looking at over a stunt like that.

The victim has something of great value in the house that it's worth the risk to break in and take by force. This scenario makes a great screenplay. But in reality it doesn't often happen. In fact, in 22 years working in the a rural county that has one of the highest per capita crime rates in Illinois, I can think of one time that it happened. There was a man who ran a vending machine business. He kept large amounts of cash overnight in home. I don't know why he didn't use the night depository, but anyway one night two people burst through his door while he and his wife were watching TV, he jumped up out of his chair and was slugged for his trouble. He and his wife were tied to chairs with duct tape and the home invaders escaped with a large amount of cash. The crime was never solved. We had a pretty good idea it was a nephew, but we have never developed enough evidence to make a charge.

Here is the reality. If you aren't involved in a criminal lifestyle or having serious family problems with people prone to violence your chances of someone breaking down your door while you are home to do you harm are almost nil. If you don't deal drugs, or allow people who do deal drugs to live with you, the chance of someone claiming to be the police to keep you from shooting them as they break into your house are also practically zero.

Despite the gun culture myths that are perpetuated on the internet, we live in a pretty safe society. Don't hang with people who have of criminal lifestyle or live on the edge of one yourself, or frequent the places those people do and the chances of being the victim of a violent crime drop considerably. Most violent crime is criminal on criminal. Normal everyday people are more likely to be victims of property crime, burglary or theft. In a large percentage of those crimes, they are victims because they refused to accept the fact that there are bad people in the world. So they leave valuable yard equipment outside in the yard overnight, don't lock their homes, garages, sheds and vehicles.

I'm not suggesting that everyone put their home defense gun in the safe every night and lock the it up, what I'm suggesting is that we spend way too much bandwidth discussing gunfights that are nothing but pure fantasy.

Now to get onto the issue of mistaken raids. Art ran the numbers. What other dangerous activity under human control has that low of an error rate? I agree that one is too many. But what is the solution? I sense that a lot of members here would just as soon disband the police and let everyone fend for him or herself. This is a no-win situation. Enforce the law and you're a jackbooted thug subjugating the population. Turn a blind eye to the law and you're a corrupt incompetent. If you want this situation to change, I suggest you change the law. If you think that someone in the government reads these threads and says; "Boys, we better back off, the gun owners are getting riled up." You're wrong. If anything these threads are pointed at as justification for more equipment and training.

If it were up to me I'd legalize drugs, all of them. That would solve the problem as 99% of the search warrants served are part of the failed war on drugs. But it's not up to me and I don't see any groundswell of public support for that idea.

I know it pisses some of you off that I am so direct. That's the way I am, don't take it personal. This isn't a theoretical issue for me like it is for most of you. I have no desire to see anyone die, either an officer or an innocent citizen. That's why I say, fix up your home so you'll have enough warning to call the authorities and find out what's going on. Grab up a gun and it's a police raid, and you will almost surely die. That's not meant to upset anyone, it's just the way it is. And leave the brave talk about rolling out of bed and shooting people at the gun shop. It makes all of us look bad, not like the responsible gun owners we are.

Jeff
 
jselvy: That's a portcullis. State of the 11th century art for castle defense.
Bingo!! I do so love the History Channel.

jselvy: Could that be rigged to drop by a push button of some sort? For when you open the door for the wrong people?
You could but I would not recommend it. If something failed, as anything can do, it could come down on you or your family and could well be fatal. If it was a cop they would have you in prison if you weren’t ‘accidentally’ shot first. Mine is locked in the up right position and must be released and manually lowered into position. This prevents any accidents.

I actually toyed with the idea of mounting it horizontally (laying it between the floor joists) and closing it using shotgun blanks. I nixed the idea because of the possibility of an accident.
 
Elza,

Better yet, replace the stairway with an escalator so that the entry breach alarm starts the thing going down--fast. The intruders will be exhausted after a few minutes of running up the stairs and go home.

K
 
We think we are the majority in this country, the great silent majority. But the truth is, we aren't. Sure the statistics show that there are guns in more American households then not. But what the statistics don't show is that in most of those households, the gun is on the top shelf of a closet and it's lucky if the owner could tell you where it was without thinking about it for a minute.
Jeff, you ask for proof and stats let's see yours. How many hunting licences, concealed carry permits, range trips ,hunter safety classes? How many gun purchases, firearm classes, tactical classes each year? How many fathers and mothers teaching their offspring the four rules? How many Eagle scouts with their rifle badges? ( do they even do that any more?) CCI/ Speer can't get enough employees to make ammunition in their Idaho plant without offering internships to college students. How many cowboy action , milsurp enthusiasts? How many.... well you get my drift.
I can tell you how many gun owning Americans killed by wrong address, late night police raids is too many. ONE.
I can tell you how many late night, wrong address police raids happened within 20 miles of my house this weekend. ONE.
I can tell you how many young fathers believing that they were defending their homes died during that raid. ONE.

Jeff ,you often say that most LEOs are just regular folk hoping to make it home after their shift. I would like to believe you, but I have met too many muscle flexing, power trippin' cops to believe you. When the local SWAT/CERT teams show up in an urban setting in full woodland camo wearing face paint it does nothing to ease the Us against them tension. Face paint indeed. If they knew they were acting honorably they wouldn't need to disguise themselves.

Jeff, the big question here is what have you done to change the system? Have you used your position as a LEO to try to change the law? Have you talked with your superiors about any over zealous ofiicers on your force? Or are there no bad cops where you work? Have you explained to your superiors that late night no knock raids can be dangerous to law abiding citizens?

I don't wantyou to take this too personal, but you are the guy who plays devils advocate for the LEO side on this forum, so you are the guy that draws the heat from the other side on this forum.

It would be great if we could all live in peace and harmony, but I don't see that happening in the near future.

So until then, Fathers will answer doors broken down in the middle of the night with guns in their hands. And I don't think glory is what they are thinkin about when they are standing at the top of the stairs in their underwear.
 
Jeff, you ask for proof and stats let's see yours. How many hunting licences, concealed carry permits, range trips ,hunter safety classes? How many gun purchases, firearm classes, tactical classes each year? How many fathers and mothers teaching their offspring the four rules? How many Eagle scouts with their rifle badges? ( do they even do that any more?) CCI/ Speer can't get enough employees to make ammunition in their Idaho plant without offering internships to college students. How many cowboy action , milsurp enthusiasts? How many.... well you get my drift.

I'll find some numbers in the next few days, but I can guarantee you that it will be a tiny percentage of the 300 + million people in the US.

I can tell you how many late night, wrong address police raids happened within 20 miles of my house this weekend. ONE.
I can tell you how many young fathers believing that they were defending their homes died during that raid. ONE.

You got some details? Surely there is at least a news article somewhere. In fact I'd be shocked if there wasn't already a thread here about that. Maybe there is, point me to it.

Jeff ,you often say that most LEOs are just regular folk hoping to make it home after their shift. I would like to believe you, but I have met too many muscle flexing, power trippin' cops to believe you. When the local SWAT/CERT teams show up in an urban setting in full woodland camo wearing face paint it does nothing to ease the Us against them tension. Face paint indeed. If they knew they were acting honorably they wouldn't need to disguise themselves.

I've never seen anyone but a sniper wear face paint, but then I don't know what goes on everywhere. In the Army we never wore face paint to disguise ourselves, but to camouflage ourselves.

Jeff, the big question here is what have you done to change the system? Have you used your position as a LEO to try to change the law?

Go over to TFL and do a search on my posts there. You will find a couple long threads where I have advocated ending the WOD. As for acting in my capacity as a police officer to lobby on any law, it is illegal. There are laws that restrict what public employees can do in that respect. I have lobbied my representatives plenty as a private citizen.

Have you talked with your superiors about any over zealous ofiicers on your force?

Not on my present department, we haven't had that problem. I did promise to resign if they hired a bad officer from another department because I wouldn't be associated with him.

Have you explained to your superiors that late night no knock raids can be dangerous to law abiding citizens?

We don't do no knock raids. I am not aware of any judge that has ever authorized one. There are a lot of factors that go into when a search warrant is served. 99% of the warrants we serve are served in broad daylight or the early evening hours by uniformed officers who knock on the door, present the warrant and then enter. The other 1% are served when there is a great likelihood that there will be resistance or there is a good chance that evidence will be destroyed. Those are usually served at the time of day when the occupants of the house are least likely to be alert and ready to resist or destroy evidence. The only time in 22 years in this county I can ever remember anyone being shot was during an attempt to arrest an armed, barricaded suspect who refused to come out. After hours of negotiation and tear gas was introduced, the SRT went in to get him and he fired on them from the bathroom. This was in the early evening hours.

Since the advent of SWAT teams there have been fewer injuries and deaths of everyone, officers, suspects and innocent citizens then before.

So until then, Fathers will answer doors broken down in the middle of the night with guns in their hands. And I don't think glory is what they are thinkin about when they are standing at the top of the stairs in their underwear.

Glory is what they are thinkin about when they post on internet forums though.

Jeff
 
I've gotta wonder here . . .


Has ANYONE here ever lived through a housefire? Cops and criminals aren't the ONLY guys who might bust down the door to your home.


I suggest we start another thread about killing firefighters and helpful neighbors.

Someone can pipe in about how they'll never have a fire at their house . . . another can discuss how firefighters cause more damage to the house fighting the fire than the fires themselves (which insurance companies have found is often the case) . . . Jeff can suggest how the answer is smoke detectors and a fire monitoring system to give one time . . . We can then all call Jeff a statist, muscle flexing wannabe hero for suggesting only he can save us from a fire . . .


Of all the reasons we might find ourselves faced with a "home invasion", someone saving our family from a fire is the most likely. So, what is everyone's plan for dealing with the fireman crashing through the door?
 
BullfrogKen, the problem with your premise is that firemen usually arrive on scene with all lights flashing and sirens wailing. Conditions that home invading criminals and cops doing a "dynamic entry" usually don't want around.

So a home fire is gonna draw all kinds of attention and wake up the neighborhood. Including those who's house is on fire.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top