Blackpowderwarrior
Member
June 1980 to April 1990 (I was a CTM), but retired in 2019 as an Army civilian. Worked for DOD my whole life. Hell, I was born on a military base in Africa.
Nice! I was born in Ft.Campbell myself
Last edited:
June 1980 to April 1990 (I was a CTM), but retired in 2019 as an Army civilian. Worked for DOD my whole life. Hell, I was born on a military base in Africa.
Well, the funniest thing for me is , I just happen to have a recent example of the "gunsmith's" offering in my shop because it won't function!! Lol I'm not saying it's an example of his normal work but the customer sent it to me because he received it (from the "gunsmith") in non-functioning condition!
So, small world ain't it ?! Lol!!
Mike
Some people are so invested in their own half-baked opinions that they are terrified to learn that they may be wrong. Their best argument (without a trace of irony) is to call opposing views "ignorant".
After working at Fed DOJ and CA DOJ and being a prosecutor for 21 years I really should know better than to try to untangle serial non sequiturs and engage in disputed statutory construction with the "experts".
My bad.
Hey, at least this ain't Facebook! Complete strangers would've called you all sorts of unsavory names by now. I had a guy tell me my parents should've aborted me because I asked about his voting habits.You guys are right !
I am wrong ! I'm over cautious, I'm ignorant, I'm a BS'er, and apparently a fool!
And I'm OK with that!!
If I see and read things differently, that's only with me and my family, not everybody else. If you don't like what I think GREAT!!! If I don't think or agree with you GREAT!!! Nobody has ever been forced to send a revolver to me . . . not even Mr. Foster who is a past customer (5 yrs ago) but apparently has a problem with me now, because I don't accept his view on this topic. I still don't . . .
Mike
Hawg, if you don't agree with this, that's OK lol!! I edited this after you "liked" it so if you "unlike" it, it's OK !
Ok, so what about the guy that builds these guns for a living and has had untold conversations with the ATF about this very subject? Does his opinion count or are you guilty of what you just accused the rest of us of?Some people are so invested in their own half-baked opinions that they are terrified to learn that they may be wrong. Their best argument (without a trace of irony) is to call opposing views "ignorant".
After working at Fed DOJ and CA DOJ and being a prosecutor for 21 years I really should know better than to try to untangle serial non sequiturs and engage in disputed statutory construction with the "experts".
My bad.
You guys are right !
If I see and read things differently, that's only with me and my family, not everybody else. If you don't like what I think GREAT!!! If I don't think or agree with you GREAT!!! Nobody has ever been forced to send a revolver to me . . . not even Mr. Foster who is a past customer (5 yrs ago) but apparently has a problem with me now, because I don't accept his view on this topic. I still don't . . .
Mike
Hawg, if you don't agree with this, that's OK lol!! I edited this after you "liked" it so if you "unlike" it, it's OK !
I wanna see, pretty please, pretty please!!![/QUOTE]The ROA gated conversion is almost done, it's a good one . . .
Mike
Well now that all the screaming is over I'll add my 2 cents.
The loading port thing never made any sense to me,
as I own a Model 1873 BP percussion revolver.
It has a gated loading port , and an ejector.
If cutting a loading port makes a black powder revolver a modern firearm,
how can the Italian Makers sell these as a Black Powder Revolver?
AntiqueSledMan.
Well now that all the screaming is over I'll add my 2 cents.
The loading port thing never made any sense to me,
as I own a Model 1873 BP percussion revolver.
It has a gated loading port , and an ejector.
If cutting a loading port makes a black powder revolver a modern firearm,
how can the Italian Makers sell these as a Black Powder Revolver?
AntiqueSledMan.
To be fair: Because the frame also has an offset hammer strike. It can't shoot cartridges as it is even with a loading port. It was made NOT to be able to shoot cartridges, specifically. Now if the frame and hammer are modified to align with a cartridge cylinder (and I think someone did that, and it wasn't easy), it would not be able to shoot c&b anymore. That makes it a "permanent" conversion, and then qualifies as a firearm (in my humble opinion).
"I am wrong ! I'm over cautious, I'm ignorant, I'm a BS'er, and apparently a fool!"LOL!!!! Well I thought the same thing for a long time but, a Howell won't work in them (I don't think) and I don't think a Kirst will either because of the offset hammer nose as well as the frame opening for said nose. Neither one of these negate the fact that there's a loading port and gate but here is the real kicker -- I don't care enough to call and argue about it!! Lol
You see, I'm 64 yrs old and don't give a rat's patooty what anybody calls me, I enjoy way too much what I do as well as the "innovation" of some of it . . . but what I enjoy most of all is when my grandkids come see us (or us them!). I'm content to stay well within the laws (as I understand them) and don't care to try and find the "edge" of right and wrong . . . I don't want my grandkids coming to see "Papa" in the "big house" . . . so that's the way it'll stand.
Mike
Yes but the same holds true for the topic at hand. The whole argument here is that the loading port and only the loading port makes it a cartridge gun. It confirms the point that the loading port alone does not allow the gun to fire cartridges.To be fair: Because the frame also has an offset hammer strike. It can't shoot cartridges as it is even with a loading port.
I wanna see, pretty please, pretty please!!![/QUOTE]The ROA gated conversion is almost done, it's a good one . . .
Mike
I wanna see, pretty please, pretty please!!!
"I am wrong ! I'm over cautious, I'm ignorant, I'm a BS'er, and apparently a fool!"
Yes (don't feel like the lone ranger). Yes (but I don't have a problem with that at all), Yes (regarding fed definition), only if you spread it, and I didn't call you a fool (I said I wasn't foolish enough to pay FFL fees when I don't have to). I have walked away from deals where a seller wants to go through an FFL for a c&b gun.
It obviously won't be a 454 Casull but a 45C. I know Dick Dastardly has (on occasion ) fired his ROA with 454 type pressures in 45C.
Oh, it was the " mama Foster didn't raise such a fool" line.
Mike
If it did, wouldn’t everyone who’s converted one of the replicas need to register as a manufacturer in order to sell the thing with or without the conversion cylinder?Yes but the same holds true for the topic at hand. The whole argument here is that the loading port and only the loading port makes it a cartridge gun. It confirms the point that the loading port alone does not allow the gun to fire cartridges.
If it did, wouldn’t everyone who’s converted one of the replicas need to register as a manufacturer in order to sell the thing with or without the conversion cylinder?