• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

CW9 vs PF-9

Status
Not open for further replies.
From Justin Moon himself:

Moon: In all, five patents were received on the Kahr pistol design. The most important of the patents is the Staggered Barrel Locking Lug. By offsetting the barrel lug and staggering it with the trigger and trigger bar assembly, I was able to greatly reduce the vertical height of the pistol from the trigger to the top of the slide. This innovation made it possible to greatly lower the bore axis of the pistol and helped compress a breech lock design toward the dimension of a simple blow back design.

I'll concede the point about the offset feed ramp providing a difference in functionality from other designs. The debate would be whether or not it is better or merely different. Since it provides a lower bore axis I would agree its better. I don't think it makes a difference in durability but point taken anyhow. When you are right, you are right.
 
Well to the OP...I shot both when making a similar purchase decision. I would have been fine with the Kel-Tec but the Kahr was more pleasant for me to shoot and I was more accurate with it. I couldn't find a CW9 so I ended up getting a used PM9 w/Black Slide and Nightsights for 500ish. I have dumped several hundreds of rounds through it with no hiccups and I am pleased with my purchase.

Both are good guns but the Kahr stood out enough to me to warrant the extra money.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top