LJ-MosinFreak-Buck
Member
Okay, so honest (and probably stupid question) here. Why don't we see a modern "gas-sealed revolver?"
I know about the Russian 1895 Nagant revolver (I've had my hands on a couple, like the design), that's why I ask. I also know that the trigger pull is significantly higher than a revolver that doesn't push the cylinder forward and against the forcing cone (if that is the correct terminology).
What's the negative here? Cost prohibitive? Or are modern societys' trigger-fingers getting lazy?
I know about the Russian 1895 Nagant revolver (I've had my hands on a couple, like the design), that's why I ask. I also know that the trigger pull is significantly higher than a revolver that doesn't push the cylinder forward and against the forcing cone (if that is the correct terminology).
What's the negative here? Cost prohibitive? Or are modern societys' trigger-fingers getting lazy?