Cylinder throat reaming question

Status
Not open for further replies.
^^ Double nope

TTv2, not to be insulting but that statement is 100% incorrect. Like not a single assertion is supported by the tried and proven techniques of accurizing revolvers to shoot hard cast bullets.
 
I look forward to hearing your results!

Okay, went out today. All .357 magnum. Shot factory JSP Federal American Eagle. Shot three different XTP handloads with 2400. And then Shot 100 rounds of cast LSWC, These were all 158 gr Cast Performance "Heat Treated Solids." I had previously had trouble with these bullets and had hardness tested them at 22 BHN. For the reloads I had sets of between 8 and 10 cartridges at each particular charge for the different loads I shot. The targets below represent all of the shots from one of those particular sets.

My XTP loads were all okay, and the heaviest load was the best, but not great. About how I shoot the Federal American Eagle. The loads seemed to get more accurate as power increased. Perhaps the magic 2400 XTP load is just a little hotter than the 13.6 Grains of 2400 shown below. 11 rounds shot at 12 yards. With reg primer.
View attachment 797001

The real revelation was the lead bullets - the 158 Grain LSWC at 22 BHN from Cast Performance that has given me trouble before.. There was this, 9 shot group at 12 yards, also 13.6 grains but this time Accurate No.9 with mag primer. One weird flyer. I think somebody pranked me when I went to the office to buy more targets. :) (Target is turned 90 degrees in photo)

View attachment 797002

Today's winner was the same cast bullet over 15.6 grains of W296. Without the flyer, the Accurate No. 9 would have been tops. I'm going to retest that load again. Anyway, here is the W296 target. Loaded with mag primer. Also turned 90 degrees.

View attachment 797003

All in all, my accuracy appears not to have degraded with jacketed ammo be it reload or factory. But the lead looks much improved. I may not melt down my Cast Performance 158s after all. I'll do future testing concentrating on W296, Acc No.9, and heaver loads of 2400. But today, I'm happy

Also, I held the gun while seated, with the grip on bag and the barrel unsupported. So pretty braced up but no barrel support.
 
Last edited:
^^ Double nope

TTv2, not to be insulting but that statement is 100% incorrect. Like not a single assertion is supported by the tried and proven techniques of accurizing revolvers to shoot hard cast bullets.
I said leading, not accuracy. A soft lead driven too fast is going to lead. A harder lead is built to be shot at higher velocities because they do not lead as badly.

If OP's revolver is accurate and his goal is to reduce leading, he should try shooting harder cast bullets. They may give him the accuracy he's getting now and not lead his bore.
 
If OP's revolver is accurate and his goal is to reduce leading, he should try shooting harder cast bullets. They may give him the accuracy he's getting now and not lead his bore.
Not necessarily, too hard is as bad as too soft.
 
Undersized throats can cause bullets to be undersized for the bore. Bullets undersized for the bore can cause leading. That simple.

It’s all about relative size from bullet to throat to forcing cone to bore... this really isn’t so complicated, guys figured it out a long, long time ago.
 
Fit is King!
I shoot hot oversized 6-10 brn with no leading!
I shoot undersize hard 18-22 brn with lots of leading!
Oversized, undersize to MY Groove Diameter!
Very same lube, very same oal, very same charges.
Again Fit is King!
Jmtcw
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top