DC just unveiled its new restrictions...

Status
Not open for further replies.

CBS220

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
868
New D.C. Gun Restrictions Unveiled

POSTED: 10:00 am EDT July 14, 2008
UPDATED: 12:31 pm EDT July 14, 2008

WASHINGTON -- D.C. officials unveiled new legislation Monday imposing strict controls on handguns and rules for registering firearms in the District.

The new regulations come after the Supreme Court struck down the city's 32-year-old ban on handguns last month, ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller that Americans can keep guns at home for self-defense.

Handguns will still be banned, except for self-defense in the home, city officials said at a noon news conference. Sawed-off shotguns, machine guns and short-barreled rifles are still prohibited.

Police will register one handgun per person for the first 90 days after the legislation becomes law, city officials said. A six-month amnesty period will be set up during which residents can register guns already in their possession.

Police will require ballistic testing on handguns before they are registered to see if the weapon was stolen or used in a crime, officials said.

The new legislation also modifies existing law to clarify that firearms must be stored unloaded and either disassembled or secured with a trigger lock, gun safe or similar device, officials said.The legislation includes an exception if a person reasonably perceives a threat of immediate harm to a person within a registered gun owner's home.

The D.C. Council is expected act on the emergency legislation called "Firearms Control Emergency Act of 2008" during the July 15 legislative session.

Police Chief Cathy Lanier also announced new rules for registering firearms and licensing firearms dealers.

D.C. residents who want to register handguns must complete an application from MPD's firearms registration section, pass a written firearms test and provide photos, proof of residency and proof of good vision. They will also be fingerprinted.

Residents can take approved applications to licensed firearms dealers within the District to pick up their weapon. Weapons purchased from dealers outside the District must be taken to dealers in the city to complete the transaction. Ballistics tests will be performed before the weapons can be taken home, police said.

Police will allow residents to register handguns they already own for the next six months. The Office of the Attorney General will not prosecute residents for unregistered possession during this amnesty period, but people who have committed crimes with firearms will remain subject to prosecution, police said. People who bring a firearm from another jurisdiction into D.C. must take it to the Firearms Registration Section or notify the section they will do so within 48 hours.

Police also clarified rules for becoming a licensed firearms dealer. Dealers must be licensed by the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, among other provisions.

http://www.nbc4.com/news/16876021/detail.html

:rolleyes:

These folks never learn.
 
:banghead::banghead::banghead::fire::fire::fire::cuss::cuss::cuss:

And it probably won't be long before they try to re-issue another total gun ban.

The new legislation also modifies existing law to clarify that firearms must be stored unloaded and either disassembled or secured with a trigger lock, gun safe or similar device, officials said.The legislation includes an exception if a person reasonably perceives a threat of immediate harm to a person within a registered gun owner's home.

Look at how they worded it. Essentially means that handguns must be kept locked and unloaded at all times, unless there is a "perceived danger". Yeah, by the time danger is perceived, it is usually too late to get that gun out of it's locking devices, load it up, and bring it to bear on the assailant or prowler.

Heller is one huge leap for 2nd Amendment rights this year, but it is still a one small step for the overall future of freedom.
 
The new legislation also modifies existing law to clarify that firearms must be stored unloaded and either disassembled or secured with a trigger lock, gun safe or similar device, officials said. The legislation includes an exception if a person reasonably perceives a threat of immediate harm to a person within a registered gun owner's home.

WTH??!! Isn't that just about the same as giving the finger to the court?

Now I'm just mad. I don't even live in in the east! What the **** good is a court ruling if they're just going to blow it off??!!


-T.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Husker1911 said:
Your elected/appointed officials refuse to recognize your Second Amendment rights...

They refuse to recognize a court order!! They were told, and they are now blatantly ignoring the Supreme Court!

BAHHH!!! I can't believe I'm this mad! I'm going to break my keyboard I'm hitting the keys so hard!

:fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire::fire:
 
I actually find this somewhat funny. Let's see if the SC lays the smack down, or lets it ride.
 
That will definitely be challenged. Fenty is a buffoon.

RIGHT IT WILL BE CHALLENGED!!!

I have 300 dollars from my last paycheck, I am going to donate that to NRA right now. They are going to need every cent of it in the upcoming lawsuit against that freedom-hater.
 
The NRA didn't even want this suit going forward in the first place. Don't look for any ILA action any time soon. :mad:


-T.


EDIT: NNGGGGG!!! I'm so damn p'd off right now. If there was ANY elected official if front of me right now I'd smack them silly on principle!!
 
Clearly they are trying to push the envelope with their "reasonable" restrictions.

What really caught my attention was the amnesty. It's a good sign that they are allowing this. It makes me wonder when more laws are challenged in the future and we begin to win more battles, just how high the amnesties will go...
 
What really caught my attention was the amnesty. It's a good sign that they are allowing this. It makes me wonder when more laws are challenged in the future and we begin to win more battles, just how high the amnesties will go...

Well, look at the Canadian firearms registry. No one bothers with it with regards to pre-owned firearms, so they keep on shifting the deadline to register back further and further.
 
if a person reasonably perceives a threat of immediate harm to a person within a registered gun owner's home.

What a crock! Is this going to stand? I love that they call it an EMERGENCY ACT.... quite the crisis giving people back their rights. Insert Non-highroad expletive here.:banghead::banghead::cuss::cuss:
 
The NRA didn't even want this suit going forward in the first place. Don't look for any ILA action any time soon.


-T.

+1. The NRA actually tried to have this suit scuttled by having legislation introduced that would have nullified the suit, thus getting no decision from the SC.
 
D.C. residents who want to register handguns must complete an application from MPD's firearms registration section, pass a written firearms test and provide photos, proof of residency and proof of good vision. They will also be fingerprinted.

Sounds like discrimination to me. What do they consider "good vision?" Is that corrected, or un-corrected? Hell, without my glasses, I probably couldn't see a fifteen foot hot pink elephant if it was fixin' to step on me. Looks like a good way to further weed out applicants. If you can see good enough to drive, you can see good enough to shoot!!!

The rest of it makes me so mad I can't even make it up to the LOW road to post a comment.

Oakville Shooter
 
If the court does nothing about this I will have lost my final remaining shred of faith in our legal system.

Face red, blood pressure up, breathing labored... I'm going home before I have a stroke.


-T.
 
I thought that SC specified about "firearms must be stored unloaded and either disassembled or secured with a trigger lock" was not conductive or conducive to a firearm being readily accessible for home defense, and thus was no longer allowed as a restriction?
 
IMHO, this does NOT meet the standards laid out in the Heller decision. Another challenge will come... let's hope DC gets slapped with some serious sanctions when it does.
 
The NRA didn't even want this suit going forward in the first place. Don't look for any ILA action any time soon.
The NRA wasn't sure enough that there would be a solid majority on the Court for an individual rights ruling. As it was, we only squeaked by 5-4. One more Justice for the dark side, and we could be facing a total ban on firearms ownership by anyone not formally a militia member.

I think the NRA will be all over Fenty's new rules like a good case of stink on a skunk.
 
D.C. residents who want to register handguns must complete an application from MPD's firearms registration section, pass a written firearms test and provide photos, proof of residency and proof of good vision. They will also be fingerprinted.
Sounds like exercising a right recognized by SCOTUS is going to be difficult.

I suppose next, in order to vote in the next election, you'll have to pay a poll tax and pass a literacy test.

Expect additional court action . . . once they lose, the mayor & city council ought to be made to pay all court costs personally.
 
I think the NRA will be all over Fenty's new rules like a good case of stink on a skunk.

Yeah..................................... this is me holding my breath:neener:
 
THe NRA did not want this to go forward because they did not think we could win. They were almost right. It would appear that a lot of the things we do not like about the ruling were included to get Kennedys vote. I have a question. Can the SCOTUS just tell DC "you are in violation" or does there have to be another court battle? If another battle does it go strait to the SCOTUS or work its way there?


Len
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top