Decision on a rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd go for a Rossi 92 in 44 mag with a 16 inch barrel. Under three feet in length, right at about five pounds in weight, smooth-sided with nothing to really catch on, and 44 magnum in a rifle is plenty of gun.
 
Last edited:
Thompson Center Contender in .30-30 or .44 mag or .45 colt or .223 or anything Bullberry makes chambered for it. It's a break action single shot that is really easy to carry.
 
A Ruger 77/44 bolt-action rifle, chambered in .44 Magnum, weighing 5.25 pounds and having a 18.50" barrel might fit the bill. Great little "woods walking" rifle that I would install a proper receiver sight on to maintain its handling attributes.
 
I started out looking to get a lightweight woods rifle. More for hiking/backpacking rather than hunting and distance will always be less then 100 yds as I hike in areas of thick forest.
Hiking and backpacking really aren't compatible with hunting. When you're hiking and backpacking, you're concentrating on covering ground, keeping a schedule, and following a pre-determined route.

When you're hunting, you're moving slooowly, sitting for long periods, and going where the game is.

For hiking and backpacking, a light .22 rifle or handgun would be ideal -- you'll occasionally spot a squirrel or other small game that you can take with that gun.
 
Sounds like the OP is looking for a general purpose rifle, carried more than shot, ready for almost anything. Maybe a Scout type rifle.
 
.
100 yds or less?

Lever gun in .44 mag. Lightweight, powerful, accurate. Rossi presently produces a decent example for very little money. I have a 16" '92 in .357 that I like very much.

I say "lever gun" because I also have a Browning 92 (made by Miroku of Japan. They also make the 92 for Winchester these days) in .44 Magnum. Great fun to shoot. Accurate. Devastating. Sure, it's not a rifle cartridge but at these ranges it doesn't matter. Shoots flat as a table through 100 yds.
 
Ruger#1 in a 45-70, with iron (ghost-type) sights. Load it light or load it heavy and you can hunt anything from rabbit to elk. It is not my favorite hunting rifle but, it is absolutely one of the most fun rifles in my safe. It is a little light-weight for heavier loads, but, I can usually shoot about 10 to 12 rounds of heavier loads before tears come to my eyes and a bruises appears on my cheek and shoulder. You can load this caliber up close to a light 458 Win or sub-sonic for plinking. I like its versatility.
 
I've decided to go with a 454 carbine, IF, it can also shoot 45LC. I called Rossi and they only recommend shooting 454 out of a 454.
Has anyone shot 45LC from their Rossi 454?

I don't know of any other company that makes a 454 carbine. Is there one?

If the above is not possible, then i think I will go with a 45LC carbine. Who makes the "strongest" levergun ... Winchester, Marlin, Henry, Rossi, other? The equivalent to a levergun what a Super Redhawk is to a revolver.
 
Last edited:
I see you went for the 454 carbine. good choice. I tested the Rossi 92 in 44 magnum, trapper length and a 20 inch barreled Winnie 94 in 30-30. With 240 grain full house loads, the Rossi was quite unpleasant with the steel butt plate. a limbsaver would help. The Rossi 92 in 454 has the decelerator pad factory installed and can shoot the 45 colt, which is all the round you need for 100-minus yards in the woods. The Rossi 92 in trapper length is so handy, I wouldn't consider anything else for this application.
 
Last edited:
Just curious....why did Rossi tell me that they do not recommend shooting a 45LC from a 454 Casull? So they don;t lose sales of their 45LC models or are there any potential issues firing both from the same rifle?
 
Savage model 42 22mag over 410 running slugs I'd be fine to 75-100yds. My gun and my experience, good luck. Light and my packing when I'm hiking with hunting on the side.
 
I think you have described a Ruger 77/357 or 77/44. Light 100 yd gun with enough punch to take a hog or small deer. If you reload it's a breeze. I have a 77/357 because I was set up to load it. If I had been set up for 44 mag I would have a 77/44. You can buy a ghost ring sight that clamps right on the receiver and forget buying a scope. You don't need one for 100 yards. A better brush gun would be hard to find.
 
Just curious....why did Rossi tell me that they do not recommend shooting a 45LC from a 454 Casull? So they don;t lose sales of their 45LC models or are there any potential issues firing both from the same rifle?
Lever action carbines can be picky about what they will and will not feed. The .454 Casul has a longer overall length than the .45 Colt, and a carbine set up for the longer round will not always feed the shorter round reliably.
 
That's why I think I have to forget the 454 and go with a dedicated .45 Colt.

I looked online at the Chiappa Alaskan Takedown in 45LC which would work well. It breaks down into two pieces for backpacking and it is supposed to have a strong action. I watched videos by Hickik45 and Jeff Quinn both who had a positive review. I could find one anywhere around.
 
The Kimber will be about 1-3 lbs lighter with a scope on it than a lever action will weigh with no scope. Depending on which lever action you decide on. My Kimber is still under 6 lbs scoped, all of my Marlin 30-30's are the heaviest rifles I own. Even my lightest lever, a Winchester 94 is 6.75 lbs and is heavier than my 300 WSM bolt gun.

Despite the myth, all things being equal lever actions are the heaviest rifles made, bolt guns can be built the lightest of all actions.

If you are interested in nostalgia and aesthetics lever actions are the way to go. If you want performance, better prices, much better accuracy, less weight, and far better reliability one of the trim bolt guns is the answer. Kimber or NULA are the lightest at around 5 lbs and most expensive. There are lots of more moderately priced bolt guns right at 6 lbs that would weigh around 7 lbs scoped. There are darn few levers under 7 lbs naked and many are 8-9 lbs. None in center fire calibers under about 6.5.

A round such as 260, 6.5 Creedmore or 7-08 will recoil much less than 44 mag or 30-30 and be more effective at 50-100 yards than 44 or 30-30. Would also be effective at 500 yards on deer, at least 400 for elk. A 308 would have a bit more recoil, but very little more than 44mag or 30-30.

FWIW I own more lever guns than all other action types because I like them a lot. But when it comes time to hunt they stay home in favor of much better choices. Unless I'm just in a John Wayne kind of mood.
Don't know where you are getting your info from but a .260 Remington and 7mm-08 have more recoil than a 30-30 or .44 mag.
 
I ended up getting a dedicated .45 Colt levergun from Rossi. I've shot several times in the past few days and it is very accurate right out of the box. I'm tinkering with loads using HS-6.

Just ordered a leather stock cover from Gunstockcover.com. They do beautiful work. Here is how it will be wrapped:

http://gunstockcover.com/product.sc?productId=4&categoryId=1

If I decide that I want the nuclear firepower, I'll get another Rossi in the 454 Casull. Before I do that, I am going to ladder different loads in the .45 Colt levergun and see if that gets me where I want to go.

I am very pleased with the Rossi.
 

Attachments

  • rossi large loop.jpg
    rossi large loop.jpg
    17.4 KB · Views: 5
Great to hear that you like it, they really are fun rifles. I'd be curious to see how hot of loads that gun can take.
 
It supposedly can take Ruger-only loads. We'll see. I'll report back as I gradually work my way up the ladder.
 
Mosin Bubba - I would have gotten the exact rifle you suggested. It is light, shorter barrel, great woods gun and you can have power with the .44 Mag. The only reason I went with the .45 Colt is that I have a Ruger SRH 454 Casull revolver which also chambers .45 Colt. That way, when I reload I can do so for both my revolver or rifle.

You were spot on, thanks!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top